Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 489-493

  Kulas, John T ^a   Stachowski, Alicia A ^b  

^a ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Construction; Editing; Response scale; Revision

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349250875     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. DuBois B., and Burns J.A. An analysis of the meaning of the question mark response category in attitude scales. Educational Psychological & Measurement 35 (1975) 869-884
2. Goldberg L.R. Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: A psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (1981) 517-552
3. Grant M.J., Button C.M., and Noseworthy J. Predicting attitude stability. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 26 (1994) 68-84
4. Hanley C. Personality item difficulty and acquiescence. Journal of Applied Psychology 49 (1965) 205-208
5. Hofacker C.F. Categorical judgment scaling with ordinal assumptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 19 (1984) 91-106
6. Klopfer F.J., and Madden T.M. The middlemost choice on attitude items: Ambivalence, neutrality, or uncertainty?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6 (1980) 97-101
7. Kulas J.T., Stachowski A.A., and Haynes B.A. Middle response functioning in Likert-responses to personality items. Journal of Business and Psychology 22 (2008) 251-260
8. Markus H. Self-schemata and information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (1977) 63-78
9. McDonald, J. L. (2004). The optimal number of categories for numerical rating scales. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver.
10. Nowlis S.M., Kahn B.E., and Dhar R. Coping with ambivalence: The effect of removing a neutral option on consumer attitude and preference judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2002) 319-334
11. Rogers T.B. An analysis of two central stages underlying responding to personality items: The self-referent decision and response selection. Journal of Research in Personality 8 (1974) 128-138
12. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide (2002), Psychology Software Tools, Inc., Pittsburgh
13. Shaw M.E., and Wright J.M. Scales for the measurement of attitudes (1967), McGraw-Hill, New York
14. Temple D.E., and Geisinger K.F. Response latency to computer-administered inventory items as an indicatory of emotional arousal. Journal of Personality Assessment 54 (1990) 289-297
15. Tourangeau R., and Rasinski K.A. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988) 299-314
16. Tourangeau R., Smith T.W., and Rasinski K.A. Motivation to report sensitive behaviors on surveys: Evidence from a bogus pipeline experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27 3 (1997) 209-222
17. Weems G.H., and Onwuegbuzie A.J. The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development 34 (2001) 166-176
18. Yang C., O'Neill T.R., and Kramer G.A. Examining item difficulty and response time on perceptual ability test items. Journal of Applied Measurement 3 (2002) 282-299