The dilemma of decontamination: A Gramscian analysis of the Mexican transgenic maize dispute

Geoforum

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 345-354

  Wainwright, Joel ^a   Mercer, Kristin ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gramsci; Maize; Mexico; Political ecology; Science

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTALISM; INTROGRESSION; MAIZE; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 67349237441     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC Group), 2003a. Contamination of Bt Genetically Modified Maize in Mexico Much Worse than Feared. ETC Group, Mexico City, Mexico. .
2. Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC Group), 2003b. Open Letter from International Civil Society Organizations on Transgenic Contamination in the Centers of Origin and Diversity. ETC Group, Mexico City, Mexico. .
3. Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC Group), 2003c. Maize Rage in Mexico: GM Maize Contamination in Mexico - 2 years later. ETC Group, Mexico City, Mexico. .
4. Alvarez N., Garine E., Khasah C., Dounias E., Hossaert-Mckey M., and McKey D. Farmers' practices, metapopulation dynamics, and conservation of agricultural biodiversity on-farm: a case study of sorghum among the Duupa in sub-sahelian Cameroon. Biological Conservation 121 (2005) 533-543
5. Andow D.A., and Zwahlen C. Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecology Letters 9 (2006) 196-214
6. Andrews, D., 2005. Questioning the moral imperative of biotechnology for feeding the world. Unpublished April 19, 2005 lecture at Vincentian Center for Church and Society, Saint John's University (New York). (accessed April 21, 2006).
7. Anon., 2002. Joint Statement by Civil Society Organisations attending the Ninth Regular Session of the FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Rome, October 14-18, 2002.
8. Aquino P., Carrión F., Calvo R., and Flores D. Selected maize statistics. In: Pingali P. (Ed). CIMMYT 1999-2000 World Maize Facts and Trends: Meeting World Maize Needs: Technological Opportunities and Priorities for the Public Sector (2001), CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F. 45-57
9. Arriaga L., Huerta E., Lira-Saade R., Moreno E., and Alarcón J. Assessing the risk of releasing transgenic Cucurbita spp. in Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 112 (2006) 291-299
10. Belchera K., Nolana J., and Phillips P. Genetically modified crops and agricultural landscapes: spatial patterns of contamination. Ecological Economics 53 (2005) 387-401
11. Bellon M., and Berthaud J. Transgenic maize and the evolution of landrace diversity in Mexico: the importance of farmers' behavior. Plant Physiology 134 (2004) 883-888
12. Bellon M., and Berthaud J. Traditional Mexican agricultural systems and the potential impacts of transgenic varieties on maize diversity. Agriculture and Human Values 23 (2006) 3-14
13. Bingham N. Bees, butterflies, and bacteria: biotechnology and the politics of nonhuman friendship. Environment and Planning A 38 (2006) 483-498
14. Bingham N. Slowing things down: lessons from the GM controversy. Geoforum 39 (2008) 111-122
15. Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), 2006. 2006 Global Biotech Crop Acreage Increases by 13 Percent Over 2005. (accessed March 3, 2007).
16. Boothman D., and Gramsci A. Introduction. In: Boothman D. (Ed). Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks (1995), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN
17. Brand U., and Görg C. The state and the regulation of biodiversity: international biopolitics and the case of Mexico. Geoforum 34 (2003) 221-233
18. Bridge G., McManus P., and Marsden T. The next new thing? Biotechnology and its discontents. Geoforum 34 (2003) 165-174
19. Brush S. Farmers' Bounty: Locating Crop Diversity in the Contemporary World (2004), Yale University Press, New Haven
20. Buttel F. Social science research on biotechnology and agriculture: a critique. Rural Sociologist 9 (1989) 5-15
21. Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), 2004. Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. CEC, Montréal, Canada.
22. Cevallos, D., 2006. Mexico Shuts the Door on GM Maize. Inter Press Service, October 28, 2006. (accessed October 9, 2007).
23. Cleveland D.A., Soleri D., Aragon Cuevas F., Crossa J., and Gepts P. Detecting (trans)gene flow to landraces in centers of crop origin: lessons from the case of maize in Mexico. Environmental Biosafety Research 4 (2005) 197-208
24. Cohen S. Planting Nature: Trees and the Manipulation of Environmental Stewardship in America (2004), University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA
25. Collinge C. Flat ontology and the deconstruction of scale: a response to Marsden, Jones, and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 (2006) 244-251
26. CWNews, 2004. Pope Urges Preserving Diversity in Food Production. Rome, October 15, 2004. (accessed April 21, 2006).
27. Dawkins K. Gene Wars: The Politics of Biotechnology (1997), Seven Stories/Open Media, New York
28. Douglas M. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (1966), Routledge, London
29. Dowswell C.R., Paliwal R.L., and Cantrell R.P. Maize in the Third World (1996), Westview Press, Boulder, CO
30. Ellstrand N.C. Dangerous Liaisons?: When Cultivated Plants Mate with their Wild Relatives (2003), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
31. Ellstrand N.C., and Hoffman C.A. Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. BioScience 40 (1990) 438-442
32. Ellstrand N.C., and Schierenbeck K.A. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 (2000) 7043-7050
33. Engels F. Dialectics of Nature of Marx-Engels Collected Works Vol. 25 (1987), International Press, New York
34. In: Evenson R., and Raney T. (Eds). The Political Economy of Genetically Modified Foods (2007), Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA
35. FAOSTAT, 2006. (accessed June 16, 2006).
36. Farr J. Science: realism criticism history. In: Carver T. (Ed). The Cambridge Companion to Marx (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 106-123
37. Gardiner S. A core precautionary principle. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14 1 (2006) 33-60
38. Gaskell G., Bauer M., Durant J., and Allum N. Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the US. Science 285 (1999) 384-387 [This paper was published July 1999 and retracted June 2000]
39. Gealy D.R. Gene movement between rice (Oryza sativa) and weedy rice (Oryza sativa) - a U.S. temperate rice perspective. In: Gressel J. (Ed). Crop Ferality and Volunteerism (2005), CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL
40. Geber M.A., and Eckhart V.M. Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. II. Fitness variation across a subspecies border. Evolution 59 (2005) 521-531
41. Gepts P. Introduction of transgenic crops in centers of origin and domestication. In: Kleinman D.L., Kinchy A.J., and Handelsman J. (Eds). Controversies in Science and Technology: From Maize to Menopause (2005), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
42. Gepts P., and Papa R. Possible effects of (trans)gene flow from crops on the genetic diversity of landraces and wild relatives. Environmental Biosafety Research 2 (2003) 89-103
43. Gieryn T. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line (1999), University of Chicago, Chicago
44. González Aguirre, R.L., Aguilar Muñoz, E.J., 2006. Bioseguridad y actores sociales. In: Presentation at the 2006 Latin American Studies Association Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
45. Gramsci A. Quaderni Del Carcere: Volume Secondo Quaderni 6-11 Edizione Critica dell'Istituto Gramsci (1977), Giulio Einaudi, Torino, Italia
46. Gramsci, A., 1995. In: Boothman, D. (Ed.), Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
47. Gramsci A. In: Buttigieg J. (Ed). Prison Notebooks, vol. III (2007), Columbia University, New York
48. Greenpeace, 2003. Maize Under Threat: GE Maize Contamination in Mexico. (accessed October 9, 2007).
49. Hails R.S., and Morley K. Genes invading new populations: a risk assessment perspective. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20 (2005) 245-252
50. Haraway D. Crystals Fabrics and Fields: Metaphors of Organicism in Twentieth-century Developmental Biology (1976), Yale, New Haven, CT
51. Haraway D. Reinterpretation or rehabilitation: an exercise in contemporary Marxist history of science. Studies in the History of Biology 2 (1978) 193-209
52. Haraway D. A manifesto for cyborgs. Socialist Review 80 (1985) 65-108
53. Haraway D. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. Feminism and Technoscience (1997), Routledge, New York
54. Haraway D. When Species Meet (2008), Minnesota, Minneapolis
55. Haslberger A.G. Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects. Nature Biotechnology 21 (2003) 739-741
56. Herrick C. Cultures of GM: discourses of risk and labeling of GMOs in the UK and EU. Area 37 3 (2005) 286-294
57. Hindo B. Monsanto: winning the ground war. Business Week (2007) 34-41
58. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), 2008. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development Global Summary for Decision Makers. (accessed May 23, 2008).
59. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), 2005. US vs. EC Biotech Products Case: WTO Dispute Backgrounder. (accessed June 16, 2006).
60. Jefferson R. Transcending transgenics: are there babies in the bathwater' or is that a dorsal fin?. In: Pardey P. (Ed). The Future of Food: Biotechnology Markets in an International Setting (2001), International Food Policy Research Institute and Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, D.C. 75-92
61. Jones J.P., Woodward K., and Marston S. Situating flatness. Transactions of the Institute for British Geography 32 (2007) 264-276
62. Kanoussi D. Gramsci en América (2000), Plaza y Valdes, Mexico City
63. Khun T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970 [1962]), University of Chicago, Chicago
64. Kimbrell, A., 2002. Fatal Harvest: The Tragedy of Industrial Agriculture. Foundation for Deep Ecology, Sausalito, CA.
65. Kloppenburg J. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology. second ed. (2004), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI
66. Krimsky S. The cultural and symbolic dimensions of agricultural biotechnology. Private Science: Biotechnology and the Rise of the Molecular Sciences (1998), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA pp. 144-161
67. Krimsky S. Ethical issues involving the production planting and distribution of genetically modified crops. In: Bailey B., and Lappe M. (Eds). Engineering the Farm (2002), Island Press, Boulder, CO 11-26
68. Latour B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (1987), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
69. Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern (1991), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
70. Latour B. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (1999), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
71. Lenormand T. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17 (2002) 183-189
72. Louette D., and Smale M. Farmers' seed selection practices and traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico. Euphytica 113 (2000) 25-41
73. Louette D., Charrier A., and Berthaud J. In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Economic Botany 51 (1997) 20-38
74. Mann, C., 2004. Diversity on the Farm: How Traditional Crops Around the World Help to Feed Us All, and Why We Should Reward the People Who Grow Them. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. (accessed March 3, 2007).
75. Mannion A.M. Biotechnology: its place in geography. GeoJournal 31 (1993) 347-354
76. Marra M. Agricultural biotechnology: a critical review of the impact evidence to date. In: Pardey P. (Ed). The Future of Food: Biotechnology Markets in an International Setting (2001), International Food Policy Research Institute and Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, D.C. 155-184
77. Marston S., Jones J.P., and Woodward K. Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute for British Geography 30 (2005) 416-432
78. McAfee K. Neoliberalism on the molecular scale: economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles. Geoforum 34 2 (2003) 203-219
79. McAfee K. Beyond techno-science: transgenic maize in the fight over Mexico's future. Geoforum 39 (2008) 148-260
80. McDonagh, S., 2006. Where Does the Vatican Stand on GMOs? (accessed April 21, 2006).
81. Mercer K.L., and Wainwright J. Gene flow from transgenic maize to landraces in Mexico: an analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 123 (2008) 109-115
82. Mercer, K.L., Martínez-Vásquez, A., Perales Rivera, H., forthcoming. Asymmetrical local adaptation of maize landraces along an altitudinal gradient. Evolutionary Applications.
83. Miller J. Stark raving mad: French farmers, activists battle over rise in genetically altered corn. The Wall Street Journal (2006) B1
84. Moore D. Marxism culture and political ecology: environmental struggles in Zimbabwe's Eastern highlands. In: Peet R., and Watts M. (Eds). Liberation Ecologies: Environment Development Social Movements (1996), Routledge, London 125-147
85. National Research Council (NRC), 2004. Biological Confinement of Genetically Engineered Organisms. The National Academies Press, D.C.
86. Ortiz-García S., Ezcurra E., Schoel B., Acevedo F., Soberón J., and Snow A.A. Absence of detectable transgenes in local landraces of maize in Oaxaca, Mexico (2003-2004). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 102 (2005) 12338-12343
87. Ortiz-García S., Ezcurra E., Schoel B., Acevedo F., Soberón J., and Snow A.A. Correction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 102 (2005) 18242
88. Ortiz-García S., Ezcurra E., Schoel B., Acevedo F., Soberón J., and Snow A.A. Reply to Cleveland et al.'s critique of 'Absence of detectable transgenes in local landraces of maize in Oaxaca, Mexico (2003-2004)'. Environmental Biosafety Research 4 (2005) 209-215
89. Pilcher J. Taco bell, maseca, and slow food: a postmodern apocalypse for Mexico's peasant cuisine?. In: Wilk R., and Lanham M.D. (Eds). Fast Food/Slow Food: The Cultural Economy of the Global Food System (2006), AltaMira Press 69-81
90. Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, 2004. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. (accessed June 15, 2006).
91. Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1972 [1934]), Hutchinson, London
92. Pressoir G., and Berthaud J. Patterns of population structure in maize landraces from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca in Mexico. Heredity 92 (2004) 88-94
93. Prudham S. The fictions of autonomous invention: accumulation by dispossession, commodification and life patents in Canada. Antipode 39 3 (2007) 406-429
94. Quist D., and Chapela I. Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 414 (2001) 541-543
95. Quist D., and Chapela I. Quist and Chapela reply. Nature 416 (2002) 602
96. Red en defensa del maíz nativo (RDMN), 2008. Announcement of 10 July 2008. (accessed July 22, 2008).
97. Reuters, 2007. Tortilla-hungry Mexico Setting Rules on GMO Corn. Reuters, July 17, 2007. (accessed October 9, 2007).
98. Rieseberg L.H., Sinervo B., Linder C.R., Ungerer M.C., and Arias D.M. Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science (Washington) 272 (1996) 741-745
99. Robbins P. Political Ecology (2004), Blackwell, Malden, MA
100. Rosset P. Personal Communication, July 2008 (2008), Chiapas, Mexico
101. Sanchez G., Goodman M., and Stuber C.W. Isozymatic and morphological diversity in the races of maize of Mexico. Economic Botany 54 (2000) 43-59
102. Séralini G., Cellier D., and Spiroux de Vendomois J. New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 52 (2007) 596-602
103. Slatkin M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236 (1987) 787-792
104. Snow A.A., and Moran-Palma P. Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. Bioscience 47 (1997) 86-96
105. Snow A.A., Andow D.A., Gepts P., Hallerman E.M., Power A., Tiedje J.M., and Wolfenbarger L.L. Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: current status and recommendations. Ecological Applications 15 (2005) 377-404
106. Soleri D., Cleveland D., and Aragón Cuevas F. Transgenic crops and crop varietal diversity: the case of maize in Mexico. BioScience 56 (2006) 503-513
107. Soule E. Assessing the precautionary principle. Public Affairs Quarterly 14 (2000) 309-328
108. Storfer A. Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biological Conservation 87 (1999) 173-180
109. Thomas P. Marx and science. Political Studies 24 1 (1976) 1-23
110. Tiedje J.M., Colwell R.K., Grossman Y.L., Hodson R.E., Lenski R.E., Mack R.N., and Regal P.J. The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms - ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology 70 (1989) 298-315
111. Toke D. The Politics of GM Food: A Comparative Study of the UK, USA and EU (2004), Routledge, New York
112. United Nations (UN), 1992. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992: Annex I. (downloaded May 30, 2008).
113. Vera Herrera, R., 2004. In Defense of Maize (and the Future). Citizen Action in the Americas 13. http://americas.irc-online.org/pdf/series/13.maiz.pdf (accessed August 2007).
114. Wainwright J. The geographies of political ecology: after Edward Said. Environment and Planning A 37 6 (2005) 1033-1043
115. Wellhausen E., Roberts J., Roberts L.M., and Hernández E. Races of Maize in Mexico: Their Origin Characteristics and Distribution (1952), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
116. Worthy K., Strohman R.C., and Billings P.R. Conflicts around a study of Mexican Crops. Nature 417 (2002) 897
117. Worthy K.A., Strohman R.C., Billings P.R., and Berkeley Biotechnology Working Group. Agricultural biotechnology science compromised: the case of Quist and Chapela. In: Kleinman D.L., Kinchy A.J., and Handelsman J. (Eds). Controversies in Science and Technology: From Maize to Menopause (2005), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
118. World Trade Organization (WTO), 2006a. Reports Out on Biotech Disputes. (accessed March 3, 2007).
119. World Trade Organization (WTO), 2006b. European Communities - Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products: Reports of the Panel, 29 September 2006. (accessed March 3, 2007).
120. Yearley S. Cultures of environmentalism: empirical studies in environmental sociology (2004), Palgrave, Basingstoke