Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1246-1251

  Lenaerts, G ^a   Bartels, W ^a   Gelaude, F ^a   Mulier, M ^b   Spaepen, A ^a   Van der Perre, G ^a   Jonkers, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Gait; Hip geometry; Hip joint centre; Hip joint contact force; Musculoskeletal model

Indexed keywords

GAIT; HIP GEOMETRY; HIP JOINT CENTRE; HIP JOINT CONTACT FORCE; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; MINING; MUSCLE; RAILROAD ROLLING STOCK;

HIP PROSTHESES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR SHAFT; FORCE; GAIT; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT PLANNING; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSTEOARTHRITIS;

EID: 67349191489     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.037     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bell A.L., Brand R.A., and Pedersen D.R. Prediction of hip joint centre location from external landmarks. Hum. Mov. Sci. 8 (1989) 3-16
2. Bell A.L., Pedersen D.R., and Brand R.A. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J. Biomech. 23 (1990) 617-621
3. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., and Duda G.N. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 859-871
4. Cappozzo A., Catani F., Croce U.D., and Leardini A. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon.) 10 (1995) 171-178
5. Davis R.B., Ounpuu S., Tyburski D., and Gage J.R. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum. Mov. Sci. 10 (1991) 575-587
6. Delp S.L., Komattu A.V., and Wixson R.L. Superior displacement of the hip in total joint replacement: effects of prosthetic neck length, neck-stem angle, and anteversion angle on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. J. Orthop. Res. 12 (1994) 860-870
7. Delp S.L., Loan J.P., Hoy M.G., Zajac F.E., Topp E.L., and Rosen J.M. An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37 (1990) 757-767
8. Delp S.L., and Maloney W. Effects of hip center location on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 485-499
9. Delp S.L., Wixson R.L., Komattu A.V., and Kocmond J.H. How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1996) 137-146
10. Harrington M.E., Zavatsky A.B., Lawson S.E., Yuan Z., and Theologis T.N. Prediction of the hip joint centre in adults, children, and patients with cerebral palsy based on magnetic resonance imaging. J. Biomech. 40 (2007) 595-602
11. Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Claes L., Haas N.P., and Duda G.N. Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon.) 16 (2001) 644-649
12. Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Kassi J.P., Claes L., Haas N.P., and Duda G.N. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J. Biomech. 38 (2005) 1155-1163
13. Huiskes R. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1990) 27-38
14. Hurwitz D.E., Sumner D.R., and Block J.A. Bone density, dynamic joint loading and joint degeneration. A review. Cells Tissues Organs 169 (2001) 201-209
15. Jonkers I., Sauwen N., Lenaerts G., Mulier M., Van der P.G., and Jaecques S. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement. J. Biomech. 41 (2008) 3405-3413
16. Kadaba M.P., Ramakrishnan H.K., and Wootten M.E. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J. Orthop. Res. 8 (1990) 383-392
17. Kirkwood R.N., Culham E.G., and Costigan P. Radiographic and non-invasive determination of the hip joint center location: effect on hip joint moments. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon.) 14 (1999) 227-235
18. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174
19. Leardini A., Cappozzo A., Catani F., Toksvig-Larsen S., Petitto A., Sforza V., Cassanelli G., and Giannini S. Validation of a functional method for the estimation of hip joint centre location. J. Biomech. 32 (1999) 99-103
20. Lenaerts G., De Groote F., Demeulenaere B., Mulier M., Van der Perre G., Spaepen A., and Jonkers I. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait. J. Biomech. 41 (2008) 1243-1252
21. Lenaerts, G., Mulier, M., Spaepen, A., Van der Perre, G., Jonkers, I., 2009. Aberrant pelvis and hip kinematics impair hip loading before and after total hip replacement. Gait. Posture. [in press.]
22. Lu T.W., and O'Connor J.J. Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. J. Biomech. 32 (1999) 129-134
23. Murphy S.B., Simon S.R., Kijewski P.K., Wilkinson R.H., and Griscom N.T. Femoral anteversion. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 69 (1987) 1169-1176
24. Piazza S.J., Erdemir A., Okita N., and Cavanagh P.R. Assessment of the functional method of hip joint center location subject to reduced range of hip motion. J. Biomech. 37 (2004) 349-356
25. Piazza S.J., Okita N., and Cavanagh P.R. Accuracy of the functional method of hip joint center location: effects of limited motion and varied implementation. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 967-973
26. Prendergast P.J., and Taylor D. Stress analysis of the proximo-medial femur after total hip replacement. J. Biomed. Eng. 12 (1990) 379-382
27. Scheys L., Van C.A., Spaepen A., Suetens P., and Jonkers I. Personalized MR-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: effect on hip moment arm lengths. Gait Posture 28 (2008) 358-365
28. Solomon L. Patterns of osteoarthritis of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 58 (1976) 176-183
29. Stagni R., Leardini A., Cappozzo A., Grazia B.M., and Cappello A. Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results. J. Biomech. 33 (2000) 1479-1487
30. Sugano N., Noble P.C., and Kamaric E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 22 (1998) 610-614
31. Viceconti M., Lattanzi R., Antonietti B., Paderni S., Olmi R., Sudanese A., and Toni A. CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Med. Eng. Phys. 25 (2003) 371-377
32. Zajac F.E. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17 (1989) 359-411