Training on N.O.T.E.S.: From history we learn

Surgical Oncology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 111-119

  Al Akash, M ^a   Boyle, E ^a   Tanner, W A ^a  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Anatomical modelling; Image registration; NOTES; Patient specific data; Training curriculum; Virtual reality simulators

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; SURGICAL TRAINING; ULTRASOUND; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 67349190614     PISSN: 09607404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.11.004     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Senate of Surgery. Response to the General Medical Council determination on the Bristol Case (1998), The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland, London [Senate Paper 5]
2. Kohn L.T., Corrigan J.M., and Donaldson M. To err is human: building a safer health system (1999), Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC
3. Moore M.J., and Bennett C.L. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg 170 (1995) 55-59
4. Gallagher A.G., and Satava R.M. Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16 (2002) 1746-1752
5. Ellsmere J., Stoll J., Wells III W., Kikinis R., Vosburgh K., Kane R., et al. A new visualization technique for laparoscopic ultrasonography. Surgery 136 (2004) 84-92
6. Vosburgh KG, Nicholas S, Christopher CT, Randy E, Samset E, San Jose Estepar R. Novel real time tracking interface improves the use of laparoscopic and endoscopic ultrasound in the abdomen. In: CARS, Osaka, Japan; 2006.
7. Vosburgh K.G., Stylopoulus N., Estepar R.S., Ellis R.E., Samset E., and Thompson C.C. EUS with CT improves efficiency and structure identification over conventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 866-870
8. MicroBIRD. Burlington, VT, USA: Ascention Technologies.
9. San Jose Estepar R., Stylopoulos N., Ellis R.E., Samset E., Westin C.F., Thompson C., et al. Towards scarless surgery: an endoscopic-ultrasound navigation system for transgastric access procedures. Comput Aided Surg Interv 9 Pt 1 (2006) 445-453
10. Aylward S.R., Jomier J., Weeks S., and Bullitt E. Registration and analysis of vascular images. Int J Comput Vision 55 (2003) 123-138
11. Morales M.P., Mancini G.J., Miedema B.W., Rangnekar N.J., Koivunen D.G., Ramshaw B.J., et al. Integrated flexible endoscopy training during surgical residency. Surg Endosc 22 9 (2008) 2013-2017
12. Granting of privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy privileging guidelines (09/2007), Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) [Revision of SAGES Publication #004 originally printed 10/89 and of SAGES Publication #0011 printed 09/01]
13. Lee S.H., Chung I.K., Kim S.J., Kim J.O., Ko B.M., Hwangbo Y., et al. An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 67 (2008) 683-689
14. Thuler F.P., Di Sena V.O., Hervoso C.M., Della Libera E., and Ferrari A.P. How many procedures are necessary to achieve competency in colonoscopy?. Arq Gastroenterol 41 (2004) 211-214
15. Marshall J.B. Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 42 (1995) 287-291
16. Verma D., Gostout C.J., Petersen B.T., Levy M.J., Baron T.H., and Adler D.G. Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 394-400
17. Guidance on the Operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (1986).
18. The guidelines 'Responsibility in the use of animals in bioscience research: expectations of the major research council and charitable funding bodies' apply to the use of vertebrate animals in bioscience research with the potential to cause animals harm; May 2008.
19. Berry M., Hellstrom M., Gothlin J., Reznick R., and Lonn L. Endovascular training with animals versus virtual reality systems: an economic analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19 2 Pt 1 (2008) 233-238
20. Wherry D.C., Rob C.G., Marohn M.R., and Rich N.M. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 220 (1994) 626-634
21. Colman J., Nduka C.C., and Darzi A. Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 8 (1994) 1709-1711
22. Satava R.M. Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc 7 (1993) 203-205
23. Datta V., Mackay S., Mandalia M., and Darzi A. The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 193 (2001) 479-485
24. Gallagher A.G., and Smith C.D. From the operating room of the present to the operating room of the future. Human-factors lessons learned from the minimally invasive surgery revolution. Semin Laparosc Surg 10 (2003) 127-139
25. McClusky D.A., Gallagher A.G., Ritter E.M., Lederman A.B., Van Sickle K.R., Baghai M., et al. Virtual reality training improves junior residents' operating room performance: results of prospective randomised double-blinded study of the complete laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199 Suppl. (2004) 3
26. Seymour N.E., Gallagher A.G., Roman S.A., O'Brien M.K., Bansal V.K., Andersen D.K., et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomised, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236 (2002) 458-463
27. Gallagher A.G., Ritter E.M., Champion H., Higgins G., Fried M.P., Moses G., et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241 (2005) 364-372
28. Ahlberg G., Enochsson L., Gallagher A.G., Hedman L., Hogman C., McClusky D.A., et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193 (2007) 797-804
29. Soler L., and Marescaux J. Patient-specific surgical simulation. World J Surg 32 (2008) 208-212
30. Audette MA, Fuchs A, Astley O, Koseki Y, Chinzei K. Towards patient-specific anatomical model generation for finite element-based surgical simulation. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 2673; 2003. p. 1000.