Estimating a sensitive proportion through randomized response procedures based on auxiliary information

Statistical Papers

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 661-672

  Diana, Giancarlo ^a   Perri, Pier Francesco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Class of estimators; Minimum variance bound; Regression estimator; Sensitive questions

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349188999     PISSN: 09325026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00362-007-0107-y     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allen J, Singh S (2001) Response techniques to analyse various transformation and selection probabilities. Interstat. Available at http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2001/abstracts/0111002.php
2. M Bhargava R Singh 2000 A modified randomization device for Warner's model Statistica LX: 315 -321 315 321
3. A Chaudhuri 2004 Christofides'randomized response technique in complex sample survey Metrika 60 223 228 (Pubitemid 39604488)
4. Chaudhuri A and Mukerjee R (1988). Randomized response: theory and techniques. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
5. Cochran WG (1977). Sampling techniques. Wiley, New York
6. Diana G, Perri PF (2007a) Regression type strategy for randomized response. In: Proceedings of the 2007 intermediate conference of the italian statistical society-risk and prediction-venice. 6-8 June, pp 459-460, Cleup, Padova
7. G Diana PF Perri 2007 Estimation of finite population mean using multi-auxiliary information Metron LXV 99 112
8. Fox JA and Tracy PE (1986). Randomized response: a method for sensitive survey. Sage Publication, Inc., Newbury Park
9. BG Greenberg ALA Abul-Ela WR Simmons DG Horvitz 1969 The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework J Am Stat Assoc 64 520 539
10. IS Grewal ML Bansal SS Sidhu 2006 Population mean corresponding to Horvitz-Thompson's estimator for multi-characteristics using randomized response technique Model Assist Stat Appl 1 215 220
11. Hedayat AS and Sinha BK (1991). Design and inference in finite population sampling. Wiley, New York
12. Horvitz DG, Shah BV, Simmons WR (1967) The unrelated question randomized response model. In: Social statistics section proceedings of the American statistical association, pp 65-72
13. K-C. Huang 2005 Estimation of sensitive data from a dichotomous population Stat Pap 47 149 156
14. NS Mangat 1994 An improved randomized response strategy J R Stat Assoc B 56 93 95
15. NS Mangat R Singh 1990 An alternative randomized response procedure Biometrika 77 439 442
16. NS Mangat S Singh R Singh 1995 On use of a modified randomization device in Warner's model J Indian Soc Stat Oper Res 16 65 69
17. A Saha 2006 A generalized two-stage randomized response procedure in complex sample survey Aust NZ J Stat 48 429 443
18. J Shabbir S Gupta 2005 On modified randomized device of Warner's model Pak J Stat 21 123 129
19. Singh S (2003). Advanced sampling theory with applications, vol 2. Kluwer, Dordrecht
20. HP Singh N Mathur 2002 On Mangat's improved randomized response strategy Statistica LXII 397 403
21. S Singh S Horn R Singh NS Mangat 2003 On the use of modified randomization device for estimating the prevalence of a sensitive attribute Stat Transit 6 515 522
22. SK Srivastava 1971 A generalized estimator for the mean of a finite population using multi-auxiliary information J Am Stat Assoc 66 404 407
23. Sukhatme PV, Sukhatme BV, Sukhatme S and Asok C (1984). Sampling theory of surveys with applications. Iowa State University Press, Ames
24. DS Tracy NS Mangat 1996 On respondet's jeopardy in two alternative questions randomized response model J Stat Plan Inference 55 107 114 (Pubitemid 126161141)
25. SL Warner 1965 Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias J Am Stat Assoc 60 63 69
26. Y Zaizai 2006 Ratio method of estimation of population proportion using randomized response technique Model Assist Stat Appl 1 125 130