On respondent's jeopardy in two alternate questions randomized response model

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 107-114

  Tracy, Derrick S ^a   Mangat, Naurang S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^b PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Randomized response technique; Relative efficiency; Sensitive characteristics; Two alternate questions model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030587970     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(95)00183-2     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Folsom, R.E., B.G. Greenberg, D.G. Horvitz and J.R. Abernathy (1973). The two alternate questions randomized response model for human surveys. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 68, 525-530.
2. Greenberg, B.G., A.L.A. Abul-Ela, W.R. Simmons and D.G. Horvitz (1969). The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64, 520-539.
3. Horvitz, D.G., B.V. Shah and W.R. Simmons (1967). The unrelated question randomized response model. Proc. Social Statistics Section, Amer. Statist. Assoc. 65-72.
4. Moors, J.J.A. (1971). Optimization of the unrelated question randomized response model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66, 627-629.
5. Tracy, D.S. and N.S. Mangat (1995). Respondent's privacy hazards in Moors' randomized response model - a remedial strategy. (Mathai Festschrift). Int. J. Math. Statist. Sci. 4, 1-10.
6. Warner, S.L. (1965). Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 60, 63-69.