Differences in gene expression of granulosa cells from women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with either recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1820-1830

  Grøndahl, Marie Louise ^a   Borup, Rehannah ^b   Lee, Young Bae ^a   Myrhøj, Vibeke ^a   Meinertz, Helle ^a   Sørensen, Steen ^a  

^a HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Granulosa; hMG; human; LH receptor; recombinant FSH

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN; CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; INOSITOL TRISPHOSPHATE 3 KINASE; NAFARELIN ACETATE; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN; S100 CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN P; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLESTEROL SYNTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORPUS LUTEUM; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE PROBE; GRANULOSA CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OVARY FOLLICLE FLUID; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEROIDOGENESIS;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GRANULOSA CELLS; HUMANS; MENOTROPINS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OVULATION INDUCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECEPTORS, LH; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A;

EID: 67349177529     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.137     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Balasch J., Penarrubia J., Fabregues F., Vidal E., Casamitjana R., Manau D., et al. Ovarian responses to recombinant FSH or HMG in normogonadotrophic women following pituitary desensitization by a depot GnRH agonist for assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 7 (2003) 35-42
2. Daya S. Updated meta-analysis of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 77 (2002) 711-714
3. Kilani Z., Dakkak A., Ghunaim S., Cognigni G.E., Tabarelli C., Parmegiani L., et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing highly purified hMG with recombinant FSH in women undergoing ICSI: ovarian response and clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod 18 (2003) 1194-1199
4. Schats R., Sutter P.D., Bassil S., Kremer J.A., Tournaye H., and Donnez J. Ovarian stimulation during assisted reproduction treatment: a comparison of recombinant and highly purified urinary human FSH. Feronia and Apis Study Group. Hum Reprod 15 (2000) 1691-1697
5. Westergaard L.G., Erb K., Laursen S., Rasmussen P.E., and Rex S. The effect of human menopausal gonadotrophin and highly purified, urine-derived follicle stimulating hormone on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in down-regulated normogonadotrophic women. Hum Reprod 11 (1996) 1209-1213
6. Coomarasamy A., Afnan M., Cheema D., van der Veen F., Bossuyt P., and van Wely M. Uninary hMG versus recombinant FSH for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation following an long agonist down-regulation protocol in IVF or ICSI treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 23 (2008) 310-315
7. Platteau P., Andersen A.N., Balen A., Devroey P., Sorensen P., Helmgaard L., and Arce J.C. Similar ovulation rates, but different follicular development with highly purified menotrophin compared with recombinant FSH in WHO Group II anovulatory infertility: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 21 (2006) 1798-1804
8. Matzuk M.M., Burns K.H., Viveiros M.M., and Eppig J.J. Intercellular communication in the mammalian ovary: oocytes carry the conversation. Science 296 (2002) 2178-2180
9. Macklon N.S., and Fauser B.C. Follicle-stimulating hormone and advanced follicle development in the human. Arch Med Res 32 (2001) 595-600
10. McKenzie L.J., Pangas S.A., Carson S.A., Kovanci E., Cisneros P., Buster J.E., et al. Human cumulus granulosa cell gene expression: a predictor of fertilization and embryo selection in women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod 19 (2004) 2869-2874
11. Chin K.V., Seifer D.B., Feng B., Lin Y., and Shih W.C. DNA microarray analysis of the expression profiles of luteinized granulosa cells as a function of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 77 (2002) 1214-1218
12. Popovic-Todorovic B., Loft A., Ziebe S., and Andersen A.N. Impact of recombinant FSH dose adjustments on ovarian response in the second treatment cycle with IVF or ICSI in "standard" patients treated with 150 IU/day during the first cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83 (2004) 842-849
13. Gentleman R.C., Carey V.J., Bates D.M., Bolstad B., Dettling M., Dudoit S., et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5 (2004) R80
14. Wu Z., and Irizarry R.A. Stochastic models inspired by hybridization theory for short oligonucleotide arrays. J Comput Biol 12 (2005) 882-893
15. Li C., and Wong W.H. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 (2001) 31-36
16. Richards J.S., Ireland J.J., Rao M.C., Bernath G.A., Midgley Jr. A.R., and Reichert Jr. L.E. Ovarian follicular development in the rat: hormone receptor regulation by estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 99 (1976) 1562-1570
17. Lindeberg M., Carlstrom K., Ritvos O., and Hovatta O. Gonadotrophin stimulation of non-luteinized granulosa cells increases steroid production and the expression of enzymes involved in estrogen and progesterone synthesis. Hum Reprod 22 (2007) 401-406
18. Peegel H., Randolph Jr. J., Midgley A.R., and Menon K.M. In situ hybridization of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid during hormone-induced down-regulation and the subsequent recovery in rat corpus luteum. Endocrinology 135 (1994) 1044-1051
19. Menon K.M., Nair A.K., and Wang L. A novel post-transcriptional mechanism of regulation of luteinizing hormone receptor expression by an RNA binding protein from the ovary. Mol Cell Endocrinol 246 (2006) 135-141
20. Kash J.C., and Menon K.M. Identification of a hormonally regulated luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor mRNA binding protein. Increased mRNA binding during receptor down-regulation. J Biol Chem 273 (1998) 10658-10664
21. Smitz J., Andersen A.N., Devroey P., and Arce J.C. Endocrine profile in serum and follicular fluid differs after ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH in IVF patients. Hum Reprod 22 (2007) 676-687
22. Platteau P., Smitz J., Albano C., Sorensen P., Arce J.C., and Devroey P. Exogenous luteinizing hormone activity may influence the treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization but not in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril 81 (2004) 1401-1404
23. Westergaard L.G., Erb K., Laursen S.B., Rasmussen P.E., Rex S., Westergaard C.G., and Andersen C.Y. Concentrations of gonadotrophins and steroids in pre-ovulatory follicular fluid and serum in relation to stimulation protocol and outcome of assisted reproduction treatment. Reprod Biomed Online 8 (2004) 516-523
24. Perlman S., Bouquin T., van den H.B., Jensen T.H., Schambye H.T., Knudsen S., and Okkels J.S. Transcriptome analysis of FSH and FSH variant stimulation in granulosa cells from IVM patients reveals novel regulated genes. Mol Hum Reprod 12 (2006) 135-144
25. Andersen C.Y. Effect of FSH and its different isoforms on maturation of oocytes from pre-ovulatory follicles. Reprod Biomed Online 5 (2002) 232-239
26. Barrios-De-Tomasi J., Timossi C., Merchant H., Quintanar A., Avalos J.M., Andersen C.Y., and Ulloa-Aguirre A. Assessment of the in vitro and in vivo biological activities of the human follicle-stimulating isohormones. Mol Cell Endocrinol 186 (2002) 189-198
27. Havelock J.C., Rainey W.E., and Carr B.R. Ovarian granulosa cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol 228 (2004) 67-78
28. Davis J.S., Weakland L.L., Farese R.V., and West L.A. Luteinizing hormone increases inositol trisphosphate and cytosolic free Ca2+ in isolated bovine luteal cells. J Biol Chem 262 (1987) 8515-8521
29. Chun S.Y., Bae H.W., Kim W.J., Park J.H., Hsu S.Y., and Hsueh A.J. Expression of messenger ribonucleic acid for the antiapoptosis gene P11 in the rat ovary: gonadotropin stimulation in granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles. Endocrinology 142 (2001) 2311-2317
30. Kamat B.R., Brown L.F., Manseau E.J., Senger D.R., and Dvorak H.F. Expression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor by human granulosa and theca lutein cells. Role in corpus luteum development. Am J Pathol 146 (1995) 157-165
31. Andersen A.N., Devroey P., and Arce J.C. Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor-blind controlled trial. Hum Reprod 21 (2006) 3217-3227
32. Nakahara K., Saito H., Saito T., Ito M., Ohta N., Takahashi T., and Hiroi M. The incidence of apoptotic bodies in membrana granulosa can predict prognosis of ova from patients participating in in vitro fertilization programs. Fertil Steril 68 (1997) 312-317
33. Ruvolo G., Bosco L., Pane A., Morici G., Cittadini E., and Roccheri M.C. Lower apoptosis rate in human cumulus cells after administration of recombinant luteinizing hormone to women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization procedures. Fertil Steril 87 (2007) 542-546
34. Crinelli R., Antonelli A., Bianchi M., Gentilini L., Scaramucci S., and Magnani M. Selective inhibition of NF-κB activation and TNF-α production in macrophages by red blood cell-mediated delivery of dexamethasone. Blood Cells Mol Dis 26 (2000) 211-222
35. Neubourg D.D., Robins A., Fishel S., and Gibbon L. Flow cytometric analysis of granulosa cells from follicular fluid after follicular stimulation. Hum Reprod 11 (1996) 2211-2214
36. Quinn M.C., McGregor S.B., Stanton J.L., Hessian P.A., Gillett W.R., and Green D.P. Purification of granulosa cells from human ovarian follicular fluid using granulosa cell aggregates. Reprod Fertil Dev 18 (2006) 501-508