Teachers in transition: Moving towards CAS-supported classrooms;LehrerInnen im Übergang: Entwicklung in Richtung eines CAS-unterstützten Mathematikunterrichts

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 196-203

  Kendal, Margaret ^a   Stacey, Kaye ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349163452     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02655822     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dick, T. P. (1996): Much more than a toy. Graphing calculators in secondary school calculus. In: P. Gomez; B. Waits (Eds.), Roles of Calculators in the Classroom, p. 31-46. [On line]. Available: http://ued.uniandes.edu.co/servidor/em/recinf/tg18/Dick/Dick-1.html (Downloaded 18th October 1998).
2. Etlinger, L. (1974): The electronic calculator: A new trend in school mathematics. In: Educational Technology, XIV(12), p. 43-45.
3. Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (1995): Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject matter. In: Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, p. 1-20.
4. Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992): Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In: D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan, p. 147-164.
5. Fine, A. E.; Fleener, M. J. (1994): Calculators as instructional tools: Perceptions of three preservice teachers. In: Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 13(1), p. 83-100.
6. Guin, D.; Trouche, L. (1999): The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. In: International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3, p. 195-227.
7. Gutstein, E.; Mack, N. K. (1998): Learning about teaching for understanding through the study of tutoring. In: Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(4), p. 441-465.
8. Jablonka, E.; Keitel, G. (2000): The distinctive professional knowledge and professionalism of teachers of mathematics: the problem of integration of knowledge. In: J. Wakefield (Ed.), Mathematics shaping the future. Melbourne: MAV, p. 118-124.
9. Jost, K. L. E. (1992): The implementation of technology in the calculus classroom: An examination of teacher beliefs, practice and curriculum change. Syracuse University, Unpublished Ph.D. (Dissertation Abstracts International; 49/06 1397.)
10. Keller, B.; Russell, C.; Thompson, H. (1999a): A large scale study clarifying the roles of the TI-92 and instructional format on student success in calculus. In: The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 6(3), p. 191-207.
11. Keller, B.; Russell, C.; Thompson, H. (1999b): Effects of student-centred teaching on student evaluations in calculus. In: Educational Research Quarterly, 23(1), p. 59-73.
12. Kendal, M. (2002): Teaching and learning introductory differential calculus with a computer algebra system. The University of Melbourne, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
13. Kendal, M.; Stacey, K. (1999): Varieties of teacher privileging for teaching calculus with computer algebra systems. In: The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 6(4), p. 233-247.
14. Kendal, M.; Stacey, K. (2001a): The impact of teacher privileging on learning differentiation with technology. In: International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 6(2), p. 143-165.
15. Kendal, M.; Stacey, K. (2001b): Influences on and factors changing technology privileging. In: M. van den Heuval-Panzhuizen (Ed.), Proceeding so the 25th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Program Committee, Vol. 3, p. 217-224.
16. Kendal, M.; Stacey, K.; Pierce, R. (in press): L'influence des environnments de calcul formel sur les modes de travail des enseignants. In: D. Guin; L. Trouche (Eds.), Calculatrices symboliques. Transformer un outil en un instrument du travail mathématique: Un problème didactique. Grenoble, France: La Pensee Sauvage. An English translation is also in press.
17. Kuhn, T.; Ball, D. (1986): Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains of teacher knowledge, skills and dispositions. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Center on Teacher Education.
18. Noss, R.; Hoyles, C. (1996): Windows on mathematical meaning: learning cultures and computers. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Repo, S. (1994): Understanding and reflective abstraction: Learning the concept of derivative in a computer environment. In: International DERIVE Journal, 1(1), p. 97-113.
20. Shulman, L. S. (1986): Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. In: Educational Researcher (February), p. 4-14.
21. Simmt, E. (1997): Graphing calculators in high schools. In: Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2/3), p. 269-289.
22. Stacey, K.; Asp, G.; McCrae, B. (2000): Goals for a CAS-active senior mathematics curriculum. In: M. Thomas (Ed.), TIME 2000 (Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Education, 11-14th December, pp.244-252). Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland. Available: www.edfa.unimelb.edu.au/DSME/CASCAT/
23. Stacey, K.; Kendal, M.; Pierce, R. (2002): Teaching with CAS in a time of transition. In: International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 9(2).
24. Tall, D. (1996): Functions and calculus. In: A. Bishop; K. Clements; C. Keitel; J. Kilpatrick; C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 289-325.
25. Tharp, M. L.; Fitzsimmons, J. A.; Brown Ayres R. L. (1997): Negotiating a technological shift: Teacher perception of the implementation of graphing calculators. In: Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(4), p. 551-575.
26. Thompson, I. G. (1992): Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In: D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York, NY: Macmillan, p.127-146.
27. Wertsch, J. (1990): The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.