Erratum: Keynes and Wagner on government expenditures and economic development: The case of a developing economy (Empirical Economics 10.1007/s00181-008-0214-1);Keynes and Wagner on government expenditures and economic development: The case of a developing economy

Empirical Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 697-712

  Samudram, Muthi ^a   Nair, Mahendhiran ^a   Vaithilingam, Santha ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

ARDL and 'Bounds test'; Keynesian view; Public expenditures; Wagner's Law

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT; KEYNESIAN THEORY; PUBLIC SPENDING;

ASIA; EURASIA; MALAYSIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 67349156721     PISSN: 03777332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-009-0264-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Abu-Bader S, Abu-Qarn A (2003) Government expenditures, military spending and economic growth: Causality evidence from Egypt, Israel and Syria. J Policy Model 25:567-583
2. Ahsan S, Kwan A, Sahni B (1989) Causality between government consumption expenditures and national income: OECD countries. Public Financ 44(2):204-224
3. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B, Csake F(eds) International symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest
4. Ansari M, Gordon D, Akuamoah C (1997) Keynes versus Wagner: Public expenditure and national income for three African countries. Appl Econ 29:543-550
5. Bank Negara Malaysia (1970-2004) BNM annual report. http://www.bnm.gov.my
6. Bardsen G (1989) Estimation of long-run coefficients in error correction models. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 51:345-350
7. Barth JR, Keleher RE, Russek FS (1990) The scale of government and economic activity. South Econ J 13:142-183
8. Bharat K, Panik M, Wahab M (2000) Government expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from G7 countries. Appl Econ 32(8):1059-1068
9. Chang T, Liu W, Caudill S (2004) A re-examination of Wagner's law for ten countries based on cointegration and error-correction modeling technique. Appl Financ Econ 14:577-589
10. Department of Statistics Malaysia (1970-2004) Yearbook of statistics Malaysia. http://www.statistics.gov.my
11. Dritsakis N, Adamopoulos A (2004) A causal relationship between government spending and economic development: An empirical examination of the Greek economy. Appl Econ 36:457-464
12. Engle R, Granger C (1987) Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251-276
13. Gandhi V (1971) Wagner's law of public expenditure: Do recent cross section studies confirm it?. Public Financ 26:44-55
14. Ghali K (1999) Government size and economic growth: Evidence from a multivariate cointegration analysis. Appl Econ 31:975-987
15. Granger C (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424-438
16. Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996a) Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J Econom 70:99-126
17. Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996b) Tests for cointegration in models with regime and trend shifts. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 58:555-559
18. Gupta S (1967) Public expenditure and economic growth: A time-series analysis. Public Financ 22:423-426
19. Holmes JM, Hutton PA (1990) On the causal relationship between government expenditures and national income. Rev Econ Stat 72(1):87-95
20. Hondroyiannis G, Papapetrou E (1995) An examination of Wagner's law for Greece: A cointegration analysis. Public Financ 50(1):67-79
21. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:176-181
22. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications for the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52:169-210
23. Khan A (1990) Wagner's law and the developing economy: A time series evidence from Pakistan. Indian Econ J 38(1): 115-123
24. Landau D (1983) Government expenditure and economic growth: A cross-country study. South Econ J 49:783-792
25. Mah J (2000) An empirical examination of the disaggregated import demand of Korea - the case of information technology products. J Asian Econ 11:237-244
26. Mann A (1980) Wagner's law: An econometric test for Mexico 1925-1976. Natl Tax J 33(2): 189-201
27. Ministry of Finance (1970-2004) Economic report. http://www.treasury.gov.my
28. Murthy N (1993) Further evidence of Wagner's law for Mexico: An application of cointegration analysis. Public Financ 48(1): 92-96
29. Musgrave RA (1969) Fiscal systems. Yale University Press, New Haven
30. Musgrave R, Musgrave P (1988) Public finance in theory and practice. 5th edn. MacGraw-Hill, New York
31. Pesaran H, Shin Y, Smith R (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econom 16: 289-326
32. Phillips P, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335-346
33. Quah D (1991) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 37:426-434
34. Ram R (1987) Wagner's hypothesis in time series and cross section perspectives: Evidence from real data for 115 countries. Rev Econ Stat 69(2):359-393
35. Rubinson R (1977) Dependency, government revenue and economic growth, 1955-70. Stud Comp Econ Dev 12:3-28