A mixed spectrum management framework for the future wireless service based on techno-economic analysis: The Korean spectrum policy study

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 407-421

  Hwang, Junseok ^a   Yoon, Hyenyoung ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Innovative technology; Mixed spectrum management; Secondary use; Unlicensed use; Welfare analysis

Indexed keywords

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY; MIXED SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT; SECONDARY USE; UNLICENSED USE; WELFARE ANALYSIS;

DIELECTRIC WAVEGUIDES; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EID: 67349152822     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Attar A., Ghorash S.A., Sooriyabandara M., and Aghvami A.H. Challenges of real-time secondary usage of spectrum. Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking 52 4 (2008) 816-830
2. Baumol W.J., and Robyn D. Toward an evolutionary regime for spectrum governance: Licensing or unrestricted entry? (2006), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
3. Benjamin S.M. Spectrum abundance and the choice between private and public control. New York University Law Review 78 (2007) 2007-2102
4. Burns, J., Hansen, P., Marcus, J. S., Marcus, M., Marks, P., Pujol, F., & Redman, M. (2006). Study on legal, economic, & technical aspects of 'collective use' of spectrum in the European community. Mott MacDonald Consulting Report.
5. Cave M. New spectrum-using technologies and the future of spectrum management: A European policy perspective. In: Richards E., Foster R., and Kiedrowski T. (Eds). Communications the next decade (2006), Ofcom, London, UK
6. Chapin, J. M., & Lehr, W. H. (2007). Time-limited leases for innovative radios. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) (pp. 606-619). Dublin, Ireland.
7. Choi, Y. J. (2008). The introduction of spectrum auction: Issues and overseas cases. In Proceedings of the open policy forum for the introducing a spectrum auction (pp. 28-62). Korea Radio Promotion Association, Seoul, Korea.
8. Chung W.C., Lim E., Yook J.G., and Park H.K. Calculation of spectral efficiency for estimating spectrum requirements of IMT-Advanced in Korean mobile communication environments. ETRI Journal 29 2 (2007) 153-161
9. Coase R.H. The Federal Communications Commission. The Journal of Law and Economics 2 (1959) 1-40
10. Cooper, M. (2005). The economics of collaborative production in the spectrum commons. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE symposium on new frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) (pp. 379-400). Baltimore, MD.
11. Diao Z., and Li V.O.K. Fading-aware packet scheduling algorithm in OFDM-MIMO systems. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2007) 1-10
12. Famolari D., Mandayam N.B., Goodman D.J., and Shah V. A new framework for power control in wireless data networks: Games, utility and pricing. In: Ganesh R., Pahlavan K., and Zvonar Z. (Eds). Wireless multimedia network technologies (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 289-310
13. Farquhar M.C., and Fitzgerald A.Q. Legal and regulatory issues regarding spectrum rights trading. Telecommunications Policy 27 (2003) 527-532
14. Faulhaber G.R. The future of wireless telecommunications: Spectrum as a critical resource. Information Economics and Policy 18 (2006) 256-271
15. Hazlett T.W. Liberalizing US spectrum allocation. Telecommunications Policy 27 (2003) 485-499
16. Hazlett, T. W. & Bazelon, C. (2007). Market allocation of radio spectrum. In ITU workshop on market mechanisms for spectrum management, Geneva, Switzerland.
17. ITU Document: MMSM/03 (2007). European spectrum management: successes, failures & lessons.
18. ITU Document: RSM/08 (2004). Advanced wireless technologies and spectra management.
19. ITU Document: SMIS/07 (2007). Beyond licensed vs. unlicensed: spectrum access rights continua.
20. ITU Report (2006). Estimated spectrum bandwidth requirements for the future development of IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced. Rec. ITU-R M.2078.
21. Kim Y., and Lee M. Recent changes of spectra management policy and their implications. Korea Association for Telecommunications Policies 13 1 (2006) 101-123
22. Lehr, W. & Crowcroft, J. (2005). Managing shared access to a spectrum commons. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE symposium on new frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) (pp. 420-444). Baltimore, MD.
23. Mitola J. Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications 6 4 (1999) 13-18
24. OECD. (2005). Secondary markets for spectrum: Policy issues, OECD digital economy papers, 95. OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/232354100386.
25. Ofcom Consultation document (2005). Spectrum Framework Review.
26. Ofcom Consultation document (2007). License-exemption framework review.
27. Park, M. S. (2008). Investigation of main issues of introducing a spectrum auction in Korea. In Proceedings of the open policy forum for the introducing a spectrum auction, Korea Radio Promotion Association, Seoul, Korea (pp. 4-26).
28. Peha J.M. Approaches to spectrum sharing. IEEE Communications Magazine 43 2 (2005) 10-12
29. Peha J.M., and Panichpapiboon S. Real-time secondary markets for spectrum. Telecommunications Policy 28 (2004) 603-618
30. Rosston G.L. The long and winding road: The FCC paves the path with good intentions. Telecommunications Policy 27 (2003) 501-515
31. Ting C., Wildman S.S., and Bauer J.M. Comparing welfare for spectrum property and spectrum commons governance regimes. Telecommunications Policy 29 (2005) 711-730
32. Tonmukayakul, A. & Weiss, M. B. H. (2006). A transaction cost analysis of secondary vs. unlicensed spectrum use. In: Proceedings of the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (TPRC), Arlington, USA.
33. Tuttlebee W. Software-defined radio: Facets of a developing technology. IEEE Personal Communications 6 2 (1999) 38-44
34. Werbach K. Supercommons: Towards a unified theory of wireless communication. Texas Law Review 82 (2004) 863-973