Liberalizing US spectrum allocation

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 7 SPEC., 2003, Pages 485-499

  Hazlett, Thomas W ^a  

^a Manhattan Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Liberalization; Spectrum allocation; Telecommunications policy; Wireless

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; PUBLIC POLICY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

SPECTRUM ALLOCATION;

TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY;

EID: 0037672375     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-5961(03)00049-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AccelerNet (2001). Press release, legislation in closing days of 106th congress opening digital doors for Houston-based AccelerNet, 29 January 2001, http://www.accelernet.net/corp/PressRelease012901.html.
2. Blackwell, E. (2001). Changing channels in Texas. Broadband Week, 2 April 2001 (p. 36).
3. Brinkley J. Defining vision. 1997;Harcourt Brace, New York.
4. Calabrese M. Principles for spectrum policy reform. 2001;New America Foundation, Washington, DC.
5. Coase R.H. The federal communications commission. Journal of Law & Economics. 2:1959;1-40.
6. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (2000a). Policy statement. In the matter of principles for promoting the efficient use of spectrum by encouraging the development of secondary markets, 1 December 2000.
7. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (2000b). First report and order and further notice of proposed rule making. In the matter of amendment of parts 2 and 25 of the commission's rules to permit operation of NGSO FSS systems co-frequency with GSO and terrestrial systems in the Ku-Band frequency range, amendment of the commission's rules to authorize subsidiary terrestrial use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz band by direct broadcast satellite licensees and their affiliates; and applications of broadwave USA, PDC broadband corporation, and satellite receivers, ltd. to provide a fixed service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band, ET Docket No. 98-206, RM-9147, RM-9245, 8 December 2000.
8. Friedman J. Fostering development of advanced telecommunications technologies. The FCC, pioneer's preference & personal communications services Cordozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. 12(2):1994;545.
9. Geller, H., & Lampert, D. (1989). Petition for rule making submitted 14 July 1989, in Federal Communications Commission, Establishment of procedures to provide a preference to applicants proposing an allocation for new services, notice of proposed rule making, GEN Docket No. 90-217, released 27 April, 1990.
10. Hazlett T.W. The rationality of US regulation of the broadcast spectrum. Journal of Law & Economics. 33:1990;133-175.
11. Hazlett, T. W. (2001a). The wireless craze, the unlimited bandwidth myth, the spectrum auction Faux Pas, and the Punchline to Ronald Coase's big joke: An essay on airwave allocation policy. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 14(2), 337-469; http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/14HarvJLTech335.pdf.
12. Hazlett, T. W. (2001b). Expert declaration submitted by Northpoint technology to the Federal Communications Commission. In The matter of applications of Northpoint, USA, PDC Broadband Corporation, and Satellite Receivers, Ltd. to Provide a Fixed Service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band, ET Docket No. 98-206, RM-9147, RM-9245, 12 March 2001.
13. Hazlett, T. W. (2001c). The US transition to digital television: Time to toss the Negroponte switch. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies Working Paper No. 01-15, November 2001; http://www.aei.brookings.org/publications/working/working_01_15.pdf.
14. Hazlett, T. W., & Bittlingmayer, G. (2001). Financial effects of broadband regulation. Conference Paper, Columbia University, 26 October 2001.
15. Hazlett, T. W., & Michaels, R. J. (1993). The cost of rent seeking: Evidence from the cellular telephone license lotteries. Southern Economic Journal, 425-435.
16. Hazlett T.W., Spitzer M.L. Public policy toward cable television. 1997;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Hazlett, T. W., & Viani, B. E. (2002). Legislators v. Regulators: The Case of Low Power FM Radio, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies Working Paper 02-1, February 2002; http://www.aei.brookings.org/publications/working/working_02_01.pdf.
18. Hundt R. You say you want a revolution. 2000;Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
19. Labaton, S. (2001). An earthly idea for doubling the airwaves. New York Times, 8 April 2001 (p. 1).
20. Low Power TV Petition (2001). Petition for reconsiderations and request for expedited consideration. In the Matter of Implementation of LPTV Digital Data Service Pilot Project, Federal Communications Commission, 22 May 2001.
21. Robinson G.O. The federal communications commission. An essay on regulatory watchdogs Virginia Law Review. 64:1978;169.
22. Smith, V., Rassenti, S., & Wilson, B. (2001). California: Energy crisis or market design crisis? Paper presented to the Hoover Institution Conference on the California Electricity Crisis, 18-19 October 2001.
23. Thirty-seven Economists (2001). Comment by thirty seven concerned economists. Submitted to the Federal Communications Commission 7 February 2001; http://www.aei.brookings.org/publications/related/fcc.pdf.