N1b and Na subcomponents of the N100 long latency auditory evoked-potential: Neurophysiological correlates of voicing in French-speaking subjects

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 120, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 897-903

  Hoonhorst, I ^a,b   Serniclaes, W ^c   Collet, G ^a,b   Colin, C ^a   Markessis, E ^a   Radeau, M ^a   Deltenre, P ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b FNRS   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^d BRUGMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Categorical perception; N100; Perceptual boundaries; Speech perception; VOT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE; VOICE ONSET TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349133488     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.174     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aslin R.N., Pisoni D.B., Hennessy B.L., and Perey A.J. Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effects of early experience. Child Dev 52 (1981) 1135-1145
2. Budd T.W., Barry R.J., Gordon E., Rennie C., and Michie P.T. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. Int J Psychophysiol 31 (1998) 51-68
3. Burnham D.K., Earnshaw L.J., and Clark J.E. Development of categorical identification of native and non-native bilabial stops: infants children and adults. J Child Lang 18 (1991) 231-260
4. Chatrian G.E., Lettich E., and Nelson P.L. Ten percent electrode system for topographic studies of spontaneous and evoked EEG activity. Am J EEG Technol 25 (1985) 83-92
5. Eggermont J.J. Representation of a voice onset time continuum in primary auditory cortex of the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 98 (1995) 911-920
6. Eggermont J.J. Sound-induced synchronization of neural activity between and within three auditory cortical areas. J Neurophysiol 83 (2000) 2708-2722
7. Eggermont J.J. Between sound and perception: reviewing the search for a neural code. Hear Res 157 (2001) 1-42
8. Eggermont J.J., and Ponton C.W. The neurophysiology of auditory perception: from single units to evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 7 (2002) 71-99
9. Eimas P.D., Siqueland E.R., Jusczyk P., and Vigorito J. Speech perception in infants. Science 171 (1971) 303-306
10. Flege J., and Eefting W. Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica 43 (1986) 155-171
11. Godey B., Schwartz D., de Graaf J.B., Chauvel P., and Liégeois-Chauvel C. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 1850-1859
12. Hirsh I.J. Auditory perception of temporal order. J Acoust Soc Am 31 (1959) 759-767
13. Holt L.L., Lotto A.J., and Diehl R.L. Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: implications for speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 116 (2004) 1763-1773
14. Hoonhorst I., Colin C., Markessis E., Radeau M., Deltenre P., and Serniclaes W. N100 component: an electrophysiological cue of voicing perception. In: Fuchs S., Loevenbruck H., Pape D., and Perrier P. (Eds). Some aspects of speech and the brain (2009), Perter Lang Verlagsgruppe, Bern 5-34
15. Horev N., Most T., and Pratt H. Categorical perception of speech (VOT) and analogous non-speech (FOT) signals: behavioural and electrophysiological correlates. Ear Hear 28 (2007) 111-128
16. Klatt D.H. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J Acoust Soc Am 67 (1980) 971-995
17. Kuhl P.K., and Miller J.D. Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science 190 (1975) 69-72
18. Kuhl P.K., and Miller J.D. Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 63 (1978) 905-917
19. Liberman A.M., Harris K.S., Hoffman K.S., and Griffith B.C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J Exp Psychol 54 (1957) 358-368
20. Liégeois-Chauvel C., Musolino A., and Chauvel P. Localization of the primary auditory area in man. Brain 114 (1991) 139-151
21. Liégeois-Chauvel C., de Graaf J.B., Laguitton V., and Chauvel P. Specialization of left auditory cortex for speech perception in man depends on temporal coding. Cereb Cortex 9 (1999) 484-496
22. Lisker L., and Abramson A.S. Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Lang Speech 10 (1967) 1-28
23. Lisker L., Liberman A.M., Erickson D.M., and Dechovitz D. On pushing the voice onset time boundary about. Lang Speech 20 (1978) 209-216
24. Lück S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)
25. Maassen B., Groenen P., Crul T., Assman-Hulsmans C., and Gabreëls F. Identification and discrimination of voicing and place of articulation in developmental dyslexia. Clin Linguist Phonet 15 (2001) 319-339
26. Martin B.A., and Boothroyd A. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 107 (2000) 2155-2161
27. Medina V., and Serniclaes W. Late development of the categorical perception of speech sounds in pre-adolescent children. ZAS Paper Linguist 42 (2006) 13-32
28. Miller J.D., Wier C.C., Pastore R.E., Kelly W.J., and Dooling R.J. Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: an example of categorical perception. J Acoust Soc Am 60 (1976) 410-417
29. Näätänen R., and Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24 (1987) 375-425
30. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
31. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., Johnson R.J.R., et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 127-152
32. Pisoni D.B. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two components tones: implications for voicing perception in stops. J Acoust Soc Am 61 (1977) 1352-1361
33. Pratt H., Starr A., Michalewski H.J., Bleich N., and Mittelman N. The N1 complex to gaps in noise: effects of preceding noise duration and intensity. Clin Neurophysiol 118 (2007) 1078-1087
34. Scherg M., and Von Cramon D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62 (1985) 32-44
35. Serniclaes W. Etude expérimentale de la perception du trait de voisement des occlusives du français. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium; 1987.
36. Serniclaes W. On the invariance of speech percepts. ZAS Paper Linguist 40 (2005) 177-194
37. Sharma A., and Dorman M.F. Cortical auditory evoked-potential correlates of categorical perception of voice onset time. J Acoust Soc Am 106 (1999) 1078-1083
38. Sharma A., and Dorman M.F. Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. J Acoust Soc Am 107 (2000) 2697-2703
39. Sharma A., Marsh C., and Dorman M.F. Relationship between N1 evoked-potential morphology and the perception of voicing. J Acoust Soc Am 108 (2000) 3030-3035
40. Simos P.G., Breier J.I., Zouridakis G., and Papanicolaou A.C. Magnetic fields elicited by a tone onset time continuum in humans. Cogn Brain Res 6 (1998) 285-294
41. Simos P.G., Breier J.I., Zouridakis G., and Papanicolaou A.C. MEG correlates of categorical-like temporal cue perception in humans. NeuroReport 9 (1998) 2475-2479
42. Steinschneider M., Volkov I.O., Noh M.D., Garell P.C., and Howard M.A. Temporal encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 82 (1999) 2346-2357
43. Steinschneider M., Volkov I.O., Fishman Y.I., Oya H., Arezzo J.C., and Howard M.A. Intracortical responses in human and monkey primary auditory cortex support a temporal processing mechanism for encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter. Cereb Cortex 15 (2005) 170-186
44. Stevens K.N., and Klatt D.H. Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. J Acoust Soc Am 55 (1974) 653-659
45. Tonnquist-Uhlen I., Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B., and Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: the T-complex. Clin Neurophysiol 114 (2003) 685-701
46. Vaughan Jr. H.G. The analysis of scalp-recorded potentials. In: Thompson R.F., and Patterson M.M. (Eds). Bioelectric recording techniques. Part B (1975), Academic Press, New York 158-207
47. Williams L. The voicing contrast in Spanish. J Phonet 5 (1977) 169-184
48. Wolpaw J.R., and Penry J.K. Hemispheric differences in the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 43 (1975) 99-102
49. Yeni-Komshian G.H., Caramazza A., and Preston M.S. A study of voicing in Lebanese Arabic. J Phonet 5 (1977) 35-48