Analysing the development of small-scale forestry in Central and Eastern Europe

Small-scale Forestry

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 159-174

  Nijnik, Maria ^a   Nijnik, Albert ^b   Bizikova, Livia ^c  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b Environmental Network Limited   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Adaptive forestry; Public involvement; Sustainability; Transitional economy

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; REFORM PROCESS; RURAL AREA; SMALL SCALE INDUSTRY; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY;

EASTERN EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 67349123326     PISSN: 18737617     EISSN: 18737854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11842-009-9077-3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barry J, Proops J (1999) Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol Econ 28(3):337-345. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00053-6
2. Benhnam A, Bingham L, Merithew M (1995) Institutional reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Altering paths with incentives and information. Research Report, International Centre for Economic Growth, Washington University, St. Louis
3. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Bizikova L, Tubiello F (2007) Opportunities for land-based carbon sequestration in Slovakia. International Institute for Applied System Analyses, Vienna. Interim report, IR-07-028
5. Borlea GF (1996) Forestry extension in Romania. Country paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
6. Brown S (1996) Q methodology and qualitative research. J Qual Health Res 6(4):561-567. doi: 10.1177/104973239600600408
7. Czech Republic MoE (Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic) (2005) Fourth national communication on the UN framework convention on climate change and demonstrable progress. Report on implementation of the Kyoto protocol, Prague
8. Drgonal V, Turnock (2000) Policies for rural Eastern Europe in transition: The case of Slovakia. GeoJournal 50(2-3):235-247. doi: 10.1023/A:1007149431025
9. Estonia MoE (Ministry of the Environment of Estonia) (2005) Forth national communication under the UN framework convention on climate change, Tallinn
10. European Commission (1999) Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Brussels
11. Gaižutis A (2007) Gaining a position for Lithuanian small-scale forestry through creation of a marketing network for wood trade and services. Small-scale For 228(58):48-53
12. Hirsch F, Korotkov A, Wilnhammer M (2007) Private forest ownership in Europe. Small-scale For 228(58):23-26
13. Hungary MoE (Ministry of Environment and Water of Hungary) (2005) Fourth National communication of the Republic of Hungary on climate change, Budapest
14. IBN-DLO (1999) Resolving issues on terrestrial biospheric sinks in the Kyoto protocol, Dutch national research programme on global air pollution and climate change, Wageningen
15. IUCN (2004) Communicating biodiversity conservation for forest owners in CEE. IUCN programme office for Central Europe. Warsaw. http://www.iucn-ce.org/documents/forest/ as accessed on 15 August 2008
16. Kaljonen M, Primmer E, De Blust G, Nijnik M, Kulvik M (2007) Multifunctionality and biodiversity conservation - institutional challenges. In: Chmelievski T (ed) Nature conFervation management: from idea to practical issues. PWZN "Print 6", Lublin-Lodz-Helsinki-Aarhus, pp 53-69
17. Kouplevatskaya-Yunusova I, Buttoud G (2007) Assessment of an iterative process: The double spiral of re-designing participation. For Policy Econ 8(5):529-541. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.010
18. Lacko M, Vinca R (2002) Innovation and entrepreneurship in Slovakian forestry. Final report on results of forest holdings and institutional system surveys. Forest Research Institute, Zvolen, Slovakia
19. Lessard G (1998) An adaptive approach to planning and decision-making. Landsc Urban Plan 40(1-3):81-87. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00100-X
20. Marghescu T, Anderson J (1997) Issues and opportunities in the evolution of private forestry and forestry extension in several countries with economies in transition in Central and Eastern Europe. FAO, Rome
21. McKeown B, Thomas D (1988) Q-methodology: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
22. MCPFE (2007) State of Europe's forests, 2007. The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe, Warsaw
23. Nijnik M, Bizikova L (2007) The European Union sustainable forest management and climate change mitigation policies from a transition countries perspective. In: ReynoFds K (ed) Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CABI, Oxfordshire and Cambridge, pp 56-73
24. Nijnik M, Mather A (2008) Analysing public preferences for woodland development in rural landscapes in Scotland. Landsc Urban Plan 86(3-4):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.03.007
25. Nijnik M, Oskam A (2004) Governance in Ukrainian forestry: Trends, impacts and remedies. Int J Agric Res Govern Ecol 3(1):116-133
26. Nijnik M, Zahvoyska L, Nijnik A, Ode A (2008) Public evaluation of landscape content and change. Land Use Policy 26(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/ j.landusepol.2008.03.001
27. Niskanen A, Pettenella D, Slee B (2007) Barriers and opportunities for the development of small-scale forest enterprises in Europe. Small-scale For 6(4):331-345. doi: 10.1007/s11842-007-9035-x
28. Pal LA (2005) Beyond policy analysis: Public issue management in turbulent times, 3rd edn. Thomson Nelson, Toronto
29. Peritore N, Peritore A (1990) Brazilian attitudes toward agrarian reform: A Q-methodology opinion study of a conflictual issue. J Dev Areas 24(3):377-405
30. Salka J, Longauer R, Lacko M (2006) The effects of property transformation on forestry entrepreneurship and innovation in the context of Slovakia. For Policy Econ 8(7):716-724. doi: 10.1016/ j.forpol.2005.06.017
31. Scott W (1995) Institutions and organisations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
32. Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
33. Sisak L, Jarsky V (2002) Actual innovation and entrepreneurship behaviour in forestry in the Czech Republic. Report on results of forest holdings. Department of Forestry Economics and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Czech University of Agriculture, Prague
34. Slovak MoA (Ministry of Agriculture of Slovak Republic) (2004) Green report. Forestry, Bratislava
35. Slovak MoE (Ministry of Environment of Slovakia) (2005). Fourth national communication to the conference of the parties to the UN framework Convention on climate change, Bratislava
36. Steelman T, Maguire L (1999) Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management. J Policy Anal Manage 18(3):361-388. doi: 10.1002/ (SICI)1520-6688(199922)18:3<361::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-K
37. Van Asselt MBA, Mellors J, Rijkens-Klomp N, Greeuw SCH, Molendijk KGP, Beers PJ, van Notten P (2001) Building blocks for participation in integrated assessment: A review of participatory methods. International Centre for Integrated Studies (ICIS), Maastricht
38. Wolf S, Primmer E (2006) Between incentives and action: A pilot study of biodiversity conservation competencies for multifunctional forest management in Finland. Soc Nat Resour 19(4):1-17
39. World Bank (2003) Key Challenges of the Russian Forest policy Reform. World Bank Discussion Paper. In: Institutional Changes in Forest Management. Experience of Countries with Transition Economies: Problems and Solutions. World Bank/PROFOR, Washington, pp 20