Mapping the bilateral visual integration by EEG and fMRI

NeuroImage

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 989-997

  Liu, Zhongming ^a   Zhang, Nanyin ^b   Chen, Wei ^b   He, Bin ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual effect; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Global integration; MT+; Multimodal neuroimaging; Visual evoked potential; Visual hierarchy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 67349117778     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baillet S., Mosher J.C., and Leahy R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Sign. Proc. Mag. 18 (2001) 14-30
2. Ban H., Yamamoto H., Fukunaga M., Nakagoshi A., Umeda M., Tanaka C., and Ejima Y. Toward a common circle: interhemispheric contextual modulation in human early visual areas. J Neurosci. 26 (2006) 8804-8809
3. Bandettini P.A., Wong E.C., Hinks R.S., Tikofsky R.S., and Hyde J.S. Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation. Magn. Reson. Med. 25 (1992) 390-397
4. Barnikol U.B., Amunts K., Dammers J., Mohlberg H., Fieseler T., Malikovic A., Zilles K., Niedeggen M., and Tass P.A. Pattern reversal visual evoked responses of V1/V2 and V5/MT as revealed by MEG combined with probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 86-108
5. Brandeis D., Naylor H., Halliday R., Callaway E., and Yano L. Scopolamine effects on visual information processing, attention, and event-related potential map latencies. Psychophys. 29 (1992) 315-336
6. Buchner H., Gobbelé R., Wagner M., Fuchs M., Waberski T.D., and Beckmann R. Fast visual evoked potential input into human area V5. NeuroReport 8 (1997) 2419-2422
7. Dale A.M., and Halgren E. Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple imaging modalities. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11 (2001) 202-207
8. Dale A.M., Liu A.K., Fischl B.R., Buckner R.L., Belliveau J.W., Lewine J.D., and Halgren E. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26 (2000) 55-67
9. Di Russo F., Pitzalis S., Spitoni G., Aprile T., Patria F., Spinelli D., and Hillyard S.A. Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP. NeuroImage 24 (2005) 874-886
10. Dukelow S.P., Desouza J.F.X., Culham J.C., Van Den Berg A.V., Menon R.S., and Tutis V. Distinguishing subregions of the human MT+ complex using visual fields and pursuit eye movements. J. Neurophysiol. 86 (2001) 1991-2000
11. Eichele T., Specht K., Moosmann M., Jongsma M.L.A., Quiroga R.Q., Nordby H., and Hugdahl K. Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 17798-17803
12. Felleman D.J., and van Essen D.C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1 (1991) 1-47
13. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Poline J.B., Grasby P.J., William S.C.R., Frackowiak R.S.J., and Turner R. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. NeuroImage 2 (1995) 45-53
14. Gotman J., Kobayashi E., Bagshaw A.P., Bénar C.G., and Dubeau F. Combining EEG and fMRI: a multimodal tool for epilepsy research. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23 (2006) 906-920
15. Haase A. Snapshot FLASH MRI. Applications to T1, T2, and chemical-shift imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 13 (1990) 77-89
16. Hämäläinen, M.S., Ilmoniemi, J. 1984. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions. Helsinki University of Technology, Department of Technical Physics Technical Report TKK-F-A559.
17. Hämäläinen M.S., and Sarvas J. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 (1989) 165-171
18. He B., and Lian J. High-resolution spatio-temporal functional neuroimaging of brain activity. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 30 (2002) 283-306
19. Hupé J.M., James A.C., Payne B.R., Lomber S.G., Girard P., and Bullier J. Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons. Nature 394 (1998) 784-787
20. Hupé J.M., James A.C., Girard P., Lomber S., Payne B.R., and Bullier J. Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 85 (2001) 134-145
21. Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., Chesler D.A., Goldberg I.E., Weisskoff R.M., Poncelet B.P., Kennedy D.N., Hoppel B.E., Cohen M.S., and Turner R. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89 (1992) 5675-5679
22. Lamme V.A.F., Supèr H., and Spekreijse H. Feedforward, horizontal and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8 (1998) 529-535
23. Ffytche D.H., Guy C.N., and Zeki S. The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex. Brain 118 (1995) 1375-1394
24. Lamme V.A.F., and Roelfsema P.R. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci. 23 (2000) 571-579
25. Lavidor M., and Walsh V. The nature of foveal representation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5 (2004) 729-735
26. Lehmann D., and Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 48 (1980) 609-621
27. Liu Z., and He B. FMRI-EEG integrated cortical source imaging by use of time-variant spatial constraints. NeuroImage 39 (2008) 1198-1214
28. Liu Z., Ding L., and He B. Integration of EEG/MEG with MRI and fMRI in functional neuroimaging. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 25 (2006) 46-53
29. Liu Z., Kecman F., and He B. Effects of fMRI-EEG mismatches in cortical current density estimation integrating fMRI and EEG: a simulation study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117 (2006) 1610-1622
30. Miniussi C., Girelli M., and Marzi C.A. Neural site of the redundant target effect: electrophysiological evidences. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10 (1998) 216-230
31. Morand S., Thut G., Grave de Peralta R., Clarke S., Asid K., Landis T., and Michel C.M. Electrophysiological evidence for fast visual processing through the human koniocellular pathway when stimuli move. Cereb. Cortex 10 (2000) 817-825
32. Murray M.M., Foxe J.J., Higgins B.A., Javitt D.C., and Schroeder C.E. Visuo-spatial neural response interactions in early cortical processing during a simple reaction time task: a high-density electrical mapping study. Neuropsychology 39 (2001) 828-844
33. Murray M.M., Brunet D., and Michel C.M. Topographic ERP analysis: a step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topo. 20 (2008) 249-264
34. Nelles G., Widman G., de Greiff A., Meistrowitz A., Dimitrova A., Weber J., Forsting M., Esser J., and Diener C. Brain representation of hemifield stimulation in poststroke visual field defects. Stroke 33 (2002) 1286-1293
35. Nowak L.G., and Bullier J. The timing of information transfer in the visual system. In: Rockland K.S., Kaas J.H., and Peters A. (Eds). Cerebral Cortex (2002), Plenum, London 205-241
36. Ogawa S., Tank D.W., Menon R., Ellermann J.M., Kim S.G., Merkle H., and Ugurbil K. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89 (1992) 5951-5955
37. Salin P.-A., and Bullier J. Corticocortical connections in the visual system: structure and function. Physiol. Rev. 75 (1995) 107-154
38. Skrandies W. The effect of stimulation frequency and retinal stimulus location on visual evoked potential topography. Brain Topo. 20 (2007) 15-20
39. Steger J., Imhof K., Denoth J., Pascual-Marqui R.D., Steinhausen H.C., and Brandeis D. Brain mapping of bilateral visual interactions in children. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 243-253
40. Supek S., Aine C.J., Ranken D., Best E., Flynn E.R., and Wood C.C. Single vs. paired visual stimulation: superposition of early neuromagnetic responses and retinotopy in extrastriate cortex in humans. Brain Res. 830 (1999) 43-55
41. Tobimatsu S., and Celesia G.C. Studies of human visual pathophysiology with visual evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117 (2006) 1414-1433
42. Tootell R.B.H., Mendola J.D., Hadjikhani N.K., Liu A.K., and Dale A.M. The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95 (1998) 818-824
43. Vanni S., Dojat M., Warnking J., Delon-Martin C., Segebarth C., and Bullier J. Timing of interactions across the visual field in the human cortex. NeuroImage 21 (2004) 818-828
44. Watson J.D., Myers R., Frackowiak R.S., Hajnal J.V., Woods R.P., Mazziotta J.C., Shipp S., and Zeki S. Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex 3 (1993) 79-94
45. Worsley K.J., and Friston K.J. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited again. NeuroImage 2 (1995) 173-181