Single vs. paired visual stimulation: Superposition of early neuromagnetic responses and retinotopy in extrastriate cortex in humans

Brain Research

Volumn 830, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 43-55

  Supek, Selma ^a,b   Aine, Cheryl J ^c,d   Ranken, Douglas ^e   Best, Elaine ^e   Flynn, Edward R ^f   Wood, Charles C ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^c VA Medical Center   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^f Natl Found Funct Brain Imaging   (United States)

Author keywords

Extrastriate area; Human visual cortex; Neuromagnetic source localization; Paired stimuli; Retinotopy; Superposition of response; Transient evoked field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0033614611     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01316-5     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ahlfors S.P., Ilmoniemi R.J., Hämäläinen M.S. Estimates of visually evoked cortical currents. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 82:1992;225-236.
2. C.J. Aine, J.S. George, P.A. Medvick, S. Supek, E.R. Flynn, I. Bodis-Wollner, Identification of multiple sources in transient evoked neuromagnetic responses, in: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink, M. Kotani (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism, Plenum, New York, 1989, pp. 193-196.
3. C. Aine, I. Bodis-Wollner, J. George, Generators of visually evoked neuromagnetic responses: spatial frequency segregation and evidence for multiple sources, in: S. Sato (Ed.), Magnetoencephalography, Advances in Neurology, Vol. 54, Raven Press, New York, 1990, pp. 141-155.
4. C.J. Aine, S. Supek, D. Ranken, J.S George, E.R. Flynn, MEG studies of human vision: identification of areas V1 and V2, Recent Advances in Biomagnetism, Abstracts, 1993, pp. 10-11.
5. Aine C.J., Supek S., George J.S. Temporal dynamics of visual-evoked neuromagnetic sources: effects of stimulus parameters and selective attention. Int. J. Neurosci. 80:1995;79-104.
6. Aine C.J., George J.S., Supek S., Ranken D., Best E., Tiee W., Flynn E., Lewine J., Wood C. Differences in the temporal dynamics of visual-evoked neuromagnetic activity for central versus peripheral stimulation. Human Brain Mapping. Supplement 1:1995;25.
7. Aine C.J., Supek S., George J.S., Ranken D., Lewine J., Sanders J., Best E., Tiee W., Flynn E.R., Wood C.C. Retinotopic organization of human visual cortex: departures from the classical model. Cerebral Cortex. 6:1996;354-361.
8. Belliveau J.W., Kennedy D.N., McKinstry D.N., Buchbinder R.C., Weisskoff R.M., Cohen M.S., Vevea J.M., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 216:1991;716-719.
9. P.R. Bevington, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
10. H.B.G. Casimir, On supergain antennae, in: G. Puppi (Ed.), Old and New Problems in Elementary Particles, Academic Press, New York, 1968, pp. 73-79.
11. Cuffin N.B. Effects of measurement errors and noise on MEG moving dipole inverse solutions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME 33:1986;854-861.
12. De Yoe E.A., van Essen D.C. Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience. 11:1988;219-226.
13. De Yoe E.A., Carman G.J., Bandettini P., Glickman S., Wieser J., Cox R., Miller D., Neitz J. Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;2382-2386.
14. Flynn E.R. Factors which affect spatial resolving power in large array biomagnetic sensors. Rev. Sci. Instr. 65:1994;922-935.
15. Fox P.T., Mintun M.A., Raichle M.E., Miezin F.M., Allman J.M., van Essen D.C. Mapping human visual cortex with positron emission tomography. Nature. 323:1986;806-809.
16. Hadamard J. Sur les problemes aux derivees partielles et leur signification physique. Bull. Univ. Princeton. 13:1902;49-52.
17. Hämäläinen M.S., Sarvas J. Feasibility of the homogeneous head model in the interpretation of neuromagnetic fields. Phys. Med. Biol. 32:1987;91-97.
18. Hari R., Joutsinienmi L., Sarvas J. Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71:1988;64-72.
19. M.R. Harter, C.J. Aine, Brain mechanisms of visual selective attention, in: R. Parasuraman, D.R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention, Academic Press, New York, 1984, pp. 293-321.
20. Haxby J.V., Horwitz B., Ungerleider L.G., Maisog J.M., Pietrini P., Grady C.L. The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations. J. Neurosci. 14:1994;6336-6353.
21. Holmes G. Disturbances of vision by cerebral lesions. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2:1918;353-384.
22. Holmes G. The organization of the visual cortex in man. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B (Biol.). 132:1945;348-361.
23. Horton J.C., Hoyt W.F. Quadratic visual field defects. Brain. 114:1991;1703-1718.
24. Jeffreys D.A., Axford J.G. Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials: I. Component of striate cortical origin. Exp. Brain Res. 16:1972;22-40.
25. Levanen S., Hari R., McEvoy L., Sams M. Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Exp. Brain Res. 97:1993;177-183.
26. Maclin E., Okada Y.C., Kaufman L., Williamson S.J. Retinotopic map of the visual cortex for eccentrically placed patterns: first non-invasive measurement. Il Nuovo Cimento. 2:1983;410-419.
27. Maunsell J.H.R., Newsome W.T. Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 10:1987;363-401.
28. P.A. Medvick, P.S. Lewis, C.J. Aine, E.R. Flynn, Monte Carlo analysis of localization errors in magnetoencephalography, in: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink, M. Kotani (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism, Plenum, New York, 1989, pp. 543-546.
29. Meijs J.W.H., Peters M.J., Boom H.B.K., Lopes da Silva F.A. The relative influence of model assumptions and measurement procedures in the analysis of the MEG. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp. 26:1988;136-142.
30. Mosher J.C., Lewis P.S., Leahy R. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME 39:1992;541-557.
31. Nelder J.A., Mead R. A simplex method for functional minimization. Comput. J. 7:1965;308-313.
32. Petersen S.E., Fox P.T., Posner M.I., Mintun M., Raichle M.E. Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of single words. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1:1989;153-170.
33. S.L. Polyak, The Vertebrate Visual System, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1957.
34. W.H. Press, B.P. Flannery, S.A. Teucolsky, W.T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes. The Art of Scientific Computing, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986.
35. D. Ranken, J. George, MRIVIEW: an interactive computational tool for investigation of brain structure and function, Visualization '93, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 1993, pp. 324-331.
36. Regan D., Heron J.R. Clinical investigation of lesions of the visual pathway: a new objective technique. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 32:1969;479-483.
37. D. Regan, J.R. Heron, Simultaneous recording of visual-evoked potentials from the left and right hemispheres in migraine, in: A.L. Cochrane (Ed.), Background to Migrane, Heinemann, London, 1970, pp. 66-77.
38. Rovamo J., Virsu V. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Exp. Brain Res. 37:1979;495-510.
39. Sereno M.I., Dale A.M., Reppas J.B., Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R., Tootell R.B.H. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 268:1995;889-893.
40. Stensaas S.S., Eddington D.K., Dobelle W.H. The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. J. Neurosurg. 40:1974;747-755.
41. Stok C.J. The influence of model parameters on EEG/MEG single dipole source estimation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME 34:1987;289-296.
42. Supek S., Aine C.J. Spatial discrimination of multiple neuromagnetic sources evoked by separate and simultaneous presentation of visual stimuli. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 17:1991;1568.
43. Supek S., Aine C.J. Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source location: model order and limits of source resolution. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME 40:1993;529-540.
44. S., Supek, C.J. Aine, Evaluation of MUSIC-based initial source modeling assumptions for spatio-temporal fitting of simulated multi-source neuromagnetic data, in: L. Deecke, C. Baumgartner, G. Stroink, S.J. Williamson (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Fundamental Research and Clinical Applications, Elsevier, IOS Press, New York, 1995, pp. 463-466.
45. Supek S., Aine C.J. Spatio-temporal modeling of neuromagnetic data: I. Multi-source location vs. timecourse estimation accuracy. Human Brain Mapping. 5:1997;139-153.
46. Supek S., Aine C.J. Spatio-temporal modeling of neuromagnetic data: II. Multi-source resolvability of a MUSIC-based location estimator. Human Brain Mapping. 5:1997;154-167.
47. van Essen D.C., Maunsell J.H.R. Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience. 6:1983;370-375.
48. D.C. van Essen, Functional organization of primate visual cortex, in: A. Peters, E.G. Jones (Eds.), Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 3, Plenum, New York, 1985, pp. 259-329.
49. Zeki S. Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature. 274:1978;432-438.
50. Watson J.D.G., Myers R., Frackowiak R.S.J., Hajnal J.V., Woods R.P., Mazziotta J.C., Shipp S., Zeki S. Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex. 3:1993;79-94.