From Bangalore to the Bay Area: Comparing transportation and activity accessibility as drivers of urban growth

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 24-33

  Reilly, Michael K ^a   O'Mara, Margaret P ^a,b   Seto, Karen C ^a,c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Yale School of the Environment   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Environmental impact; India; United States; Urban modeling; Urbanization

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INVESTMENTS; LANDFORMS; LOCATION; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESSIBILITY; INDIA; UNITED STATES; URBAN MODEL; URBANIZATION;

URBAN GROWTH;

ACCESSIBILITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MODELING; STOCHASTICITY; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN ECONOMY; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN TRANSPORT; URBANIZATION;

ASIA; BANGALORE; CALIFORNIA; EURASIA; INDIA; KARNATAKA; NORTH AMERICA; SILICON VALLEY; SOUTH ASIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67349112691     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alberti M. The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. Int. Regional Sci. Rev. 28 2 (2005) 169-192
2. Angel S., Sheppard S.C., and Civco D. The Dynamics of Global Urban Expansion. Transport and Urban Development Department (2005), World Bank, Washington, DC
3. Bertaud, A., Brueckner, J.K., 2003. Analyzing Building height restrictions: predicted impacts, welfare costs, and a case study of Bangalore, India. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from http://alain-bertaud.com.
4. Breslow N.E., and Day N.E. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. I. The Analysis of Case-Control Studies (1980), International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
5. California Department of Finance, 1951, 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001. California Statistical Abstract. State of California, Sacramento.
6. California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, 1984, 1994, 2000, 2004. Santa Clara County Important Farmland. State of California, Sacramento.
7. Clarke K.C., Gazulis N., Dietzel C.K., and Goldstein N.C. A decade of SLEUTHing: lessons learned from applications of a cellular automaton land use change model. In: Fisher P. (Ed). Classics from IJGIS. Twenty Years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Systems and Science (2007), Taylor and Francis, CRC, Boca Raton 413-425
8. Elvidge C.D., Sutton P.C., Wagner T.W., Ryzner R., Vogelmann J.E., Goetz S.J., et al. Urbanization. In: Gutman G., Janetos A.C., Justice C.O., Moran E.F., Mustard J.F., Rindfuss R.R., et al. (Eds). Land Change Science (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 127-145
9. Fragkias M., and Seto K.C. Modeling urban growth in a data sparse environments: a new approach. Environ. Plann. B 34 (2007) 858-883
10. Government of Karnataka. Karnataka Gazetteer (1991), Government of Karnataka, Bangalore
11. In: Gutman G., Janetos A.C., Justice C.O., Moran E.F., Mustard J.F., Rindfuss R.R., et al. (Eds). Land Change Science (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
12. Hise G. Magnetic Los Angeles: Planning the Twentieth Century Metropolis (1997), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
13. Jackson K. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of America (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
14. Kaufmann R.K., Seto K.C., Schneider A., Zhou L., and Liu Z. Climate response to rapid urban growth: evidence of a human-induced precipitation deficit. J. Climate 20 10 (2007) 2299-2306
15. Landis J., and Reilly M. How we will grow: baseline predictions of California's urban footprint through the year 2100. In: Guhathakurta S. (Ed). Integrated Land Use and Environmental Models (2003), Springer, Berlin
16. Landis, J., M. Zhang, 1998, 1999. The second generation of the California Urban Futures model. Environ. Plann. B 30, 32.
17. Lucas S. Effectively maintained inequality: education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. Am. J. Sociol. 106 (2001) 1642-1690
18. Luce E. In Spite of the Gods: The Strange Rise of Modern India (2007), Doubleday, New York
19. Lyons T.J., Kenworthy J.R., Moy C., and dos Santos F. An International Urban Air Pollution Model for the transportation sector. Transport. Res. D-Tr E 8 3 (2003) 159-167
20. McFadden, D., 1973. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. Working Paper No. 199. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
21. Nelson G.C., and Geoghegan J. Modeling deforestation and land use change: sparse data environments. Agric. Econ. 27 3 (2002) 201-216
22. Newman P., and Kenworthy J. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence (1999), Island Press, Washington, DC
23. O'Mara M. Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton
24. Pfaff A. What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?: evidence from satellite and socioeconomic data. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 37 1 (1999) 26-43
25. Redman C.L., and Jones N.S. The environmental, social, and health dimensions of urban expansion. Popul. Environ. 5 (2005) 45-57
26. Rosenthal, E. 2003, February. North of Beijing, California Dreams Come True. NYT, p. A3.
27. Self R.O. American Babylon: Race and the Struggle for Postwar Oakland (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton
28. Sengupta, S., 2008, January. Indians Hit the Road, Amid Elephants. NYT, p. A1.
29. Seto K.C., Kaufmann R.K., and Woodcock C.E. Landsat reveals China's farmland reserves, but they're vanishing fast. Nature 406 (2000) 121
30. Seto K.C., and Kaufmann R.K. Using logit models to classify land cover and land-cover change from landsat thematic mapper. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26 3 (2005) 563-577
31. Seto K.C., and Kaufmann R.K. Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the Pearl River Delta, China: integrating remote sensing with socioeconomic data. Land Econ. 79 1 (2003) 106-121
32. Singer J.D., and Willett J.B. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Methods for Studying Change and Event Occurrence (2003), Oxford University Press, New York
33. Starr K. Embattled Dreams (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
34. Survey of India, 1980, 1990. Bangalore. Indian Government, New Delhi.
35. TKK Healthcare Limited, 2005. Bangalore Map. Bangalore.
36. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
37. Train K. Qualitative Choice Analysis (1986), MIT Press, Boston
38. United Nations, Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2004. World Population to 2300, New York.
39. United State Department of Commerce. Census of Manufacturing (1953), U.S. Government, Washington, DC
40. United States Department of Commerce. Census of Population and Housing (1980), U.S. Government, Washington, DC
41. United State Department of Commerce, 1964, 1980, 2004. County Business Patterns. U.S. Government, Washington, DC.
42. United States Geological Survey, 1940, 1947, 1948, 1961, 1972. 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Series. U.S. Government, Reston, VA.
43. Warner S.B. The Private City Philadelphia in Three Periods of Its Growth. Philadelphia (1968), University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
44. World Bank, Energy and Infrastructure Unit, South Asian Region. Towards a Discussion of Support to Urban Transport Development in India (2005), World Bank, Washington, DC