Using logit models to classify land cover and land-cover change from Landsat Thematic Mapper

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 563-577

  Seto, K C ^a   Kaufmann, R K ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; STATISTICAL METHODS; VECTORS;

DIAGNOSTIC STATISTICS; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER (TM); LOGIC MODELS;

REMOTE SENSING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 13844305894     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431160512331299270     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aldrich, J.H. and Nelson, F.D., 1984, Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. (Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications).
2. Berndt, E.K., Hall, B.H., Hall, R.E. and Hausman, J.A., 1974, Estimation and inference in nonlinear structural models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 3, pp. 653-665.
3. Collins, J.B. and Woodcock, C.E., 1996, An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 56, pp. 66-77.
4. Crist, E.P. and Cicone, R.C., 1984, A physically-based transformation of Thematic Mapper data - the TM tasseled cap. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 22, pp. 256-263.
5. Friedl, M.A. and Brodley, C.E., 1997, Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 61, pp. 399-409.
6. Friedl, M.A., Woodcock, C., Gopal, S., Muchoney, D., Strahler, A.H. and Barker Schaaf, C., 2000, A note on procedures used for accuracy assessment in land cover maps derived from AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, pp. 1073-1077.
7. Gopal, S. and Woodcock, C., 1996, Remote sensing of forest change using artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 34, pp. 398-404.
8. Hall, F.G., Strebel, D.E., Nickeson, J.E. and Goetz, S.J., 1991, Radiometric rectification: toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 35, pp. 11-27.
9. Lloyd, C.J., 1999, Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
10. Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L., 1991, Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. (New York: McGraw-Hill).
11. Richards, J.A. and Jia, X., 1999, Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: an Introduction. (New York: Springer Verlag).
12. Schott, J., Salvaggio, C. and Volchok, W., 1988, Radiometric scene normalization using pseudo invariant features. Remote Sensing of Environment, 26, pp. 1-16.
13. Seto, K.C. and Liu, W.G., 2003, Comparing ARTMAP neural network with Maximum Likelihood classifier for detecting urban change. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, pp. 981-990.
14. Seto, K.C., Woodcock, C.E., Song, C., Huang, X., Lu, J. and Kaufmann, R.K., 2002, Monitoring land-use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, pp. 1985-2004.
15. Song, C., Woodcock, C.E., Seto, K.C., Pax Lenney, M. and Macomber, S.A., 2001, Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: when and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment 75, pp. 230-244.
16. Strahler, A.H. and Maynard, P.F., 1980, A logit classifier for multi-image data, Proceedings of the Workshop on Picture Data Description and Management (IEEE).