Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: Sensory changes, muscle function, and body image

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 113, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 701-707

  Banbury, Jillian ^a,b   Yetman, Randall ^a,b   Lucas, Armand ^a,b   Papay, Francis ^a,b   Graves, Karen ^a,b   Zins, James E ^a,b  

^a Cleveland Clinic Foundation ^*

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; LIFE SATISFACTION; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NERVE FUNCTION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIBRATION; BREAST; INNERVATION; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; BREAST; BREAST IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PECTORALIS MUSCLES; PRESSURE; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VIBRATION;

EID: 4444335213     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000101503.94322.C6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2001 Plastic surgery statistics. Available at: www.plasticsurgery.org/mediactr/costrends2001.cfm. Accessed July 20, 2002.
2. Silverman, B. G., Brown, S. L., Bright, R. A., Kaczmarek, R. G., Arrowsmith-Lowe, J. B., and Kessler, D. A. Reported complications of silicone gel breast implants: An epidemiologic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 124: 744, 1996.
3. Allen, M., and Oberle, K. Augmentation mammaplasty: A complex choice. Health Care Women Int. 17: 81, 1996.
4. Noone, R. B. A review of the possible health implications of silicone breast implants. Cancer 79: 1747, 1997.
5. Embrey, M., Adams, A. E., Cunningham, B., Peters, W., Young, V. L., and Carlo, G. L. A review of the literature on the etiology of capsular contracture and a pilot study to determine the outcome of capsular contracture interventions. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 23: 197, 1999.
6. Schlenz, I., Kuzbari, R., Gruber, H., and Holle, J. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: An anatomic study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105: 905, 2000.
7. Levin, S., Pearsall, G., and Ruderman, R. Von Frey's method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: An engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J. Hand Surg. (Am.) 3: 211, 1978.
8. Dellon, A. L. The vibrometer. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 71: 421, 1983.
9. Dellon, A. L. A numerical grading scale for peripheral nerve function. J. Hand Ther. 6: 152, 1993.
10. Slezak, S., McGibbon, B., and Dellon, A. L. The sensational transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap: Return of sensibility after TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 28: 210, 1992.
11. Graham, B., and Dellon, A. L. Sensory recovery in innervated free-tissue transfers. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 11: 157, 1995.
12. Hislop, H. J., and Montgomery, J. Daniels and Worthinghams Muscle Testing, 7th Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2002. Pp. 399-400.
13. Milner-Brown, H. S., Mellenthin, M., and Miller, R. G. Quantifying human muscle strength, endurance, and fatigue. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 67: 530, 1986.
14. Rankin, M., Borah, G., Perry, A., and Wey, P. Quality-of-life outcomes after cosmetic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102: 2139, 1998.
15. Cole, R. P., Shakespeare, V., Shakespeare, P., and Hobby, J. Measuring outcome in low-priority plastic surgery patients using quality of life indices. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 47: 117, 1994.
16. Klassen, A., Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R., and Goodacre, T. Patients' health related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 49: 433, 1996.
17. Brown, T., Cash, T., and Mikulka, P. Attitudinal body-image assessment factor analysis of the Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. J. Pers. Assess. 55: 135, 1990.
18. Sarwer, D., Wadden, T., and Whitaker, L. An investigation of changes in body image following cosmetic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 109: 363, 2002.
19. Sarwer, D., Bartlett, S., Bucky, L., et al. Bigger is not always better: Body image dissatisfaction in breast reduction and breast augmentation patients. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 101: 1956, 1998.
20. Glatt, B., Sarwer, D., O'Hara, D., Hamori, C., Bucky, L., and LaRossa, D. A retrospective study of changes in physical symptoms and body image after reduction mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 103: 76, 1999.
21. Sarwer, D., Wadden, T., Pertschuk, M., and Whitaker, L. Body image dissatisfaction and body dysmorphic disorder in 100 cosmetic surgery patients. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 101: 1644, 1998.
22. Gudex, C., and Kind, P. The QALY Toolkit. Discussion Paper 38. York, United Kingdom: Center for Health Economics, University of York, 1988.
23. Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., and Wright, L. Short Form 36 (SF 36) health survey questionnaire: Normative data for adults of working age. B.M.J. 306: 1437, 1993.
24. Cash, T., Winstead, B., and Janda, L. The Great American shape-up: Body image survey report. Psychol. Today 20: 30, 1986.
25. Cash, T. F., Winstead, B. A., and Janda, L. H. Your body, yourself: A Psychology Today reader survey. Psychol. Today 19: 22, 1985.
26. Collins, E. D., Kerrigan, C. L., Kim, M., et al. The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 109: 1556, 2002.
27. Kerrigan, C. L., Collins, E. D., Striplin, D., et al. The health burden of breast hypertrophy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 108: 1591, 2001.
28. Miller, K. J., Gleaves, D. H., Hirsch, T. G., Green, B. A., Snow, A. C., and Corbett, C. C. Comparisons of body image dimensions by race/ethnicity and gender in a university population. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 27: 310, 2000.
29. Cash, T. F. The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire and Manual, 3rd Revision. Available at: www.body-images.com.
30. Elliot, L. F. Breast augmentation with round, smooth saline or gel implants. Clin. Plast. Surg. 28: 523, 2001.
31. Tebbetts, J. B. Patient evaluation, operative planning and surgical techniques to increase control and reduce morbidity and reoperations in breast augmentation. Clin. Plast. Surg. 28: 501, 2001.
32. Tebbetts, J. B. A surgical perspective from two decades of breast augmentation. Clin. Plast. Surg. 28: 425, 2001.
33. Mathes, S. J. Breast implantation: The quest for safety and quality. N. Engl. J. Med. 336: 718, 1997.
34. Worseg, A., Kuzbari, R., Tairych, G., Korak, K., and Holle, J. Long term results of inflatable mammary implants. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 48: 183, 1995.
35. Biggs, T. M., Cukier, J., and Worthing, L. F. Augmentation mammaplasty: A review of 18 years. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 69: 445, 1982.
36. McGrath, M. H., and Burkhardt, B. R. The safety and efficacy of breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 74: 550, 1984.
37. Handel, N., Jensen, J. A., Black, Q., Waisman, J. R., and Silverstein, M.J. The fate of breast implants: A critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 96: 1521, 1995.
38. McKinney, P., and Tresley, G. Long-term comparison of patients with gel and saline mammary implants Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 73: 27, 1983.
39. Gabriel, S. E., Woods, J. E., O'Fallon, M., Beard, C. M., Kurland, L. T., and Melton, L.J. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 336: 677, 1997.
40. Gutowski, K. A., Mesna, G. T., and Cunningham, B. L. Saline-filled breast implants: A Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation multicenter outcomes study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 100: 1019, 1997.
41. Park, A. J., Chetty, U., and Watson, A. C. H. Patient satisfaction following insertion of silicone breast implants. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 49: 515, 1996.
42. Sarwer, D. B., Nordmann, J. E., and Herbert, J. D. Cosmetic breast augmentation surgery: A critical overview. J. Womens Health Gend. Based Med. 9: 843, 2000.
43. Courtiss, E., and Goldwyn, R. Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 58: 1, 1976.
44. Hetter, G. Satisfaction and dissatisfactions of patients with augmentation mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 64: 151, 1979.