Social learning as a basis for cooperative small-scale forest management

Small-scale Forestry

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 193-209

  Dedeurwaerdere, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Coupled socio ecological systems; Forest groups; Governance; Institutional analysis

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; SMALL SCALE INDUSTRY; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

EID: 67349084050     PISSN: 18737617     EISSN: 18737854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11842-009-9075-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alchian A, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs and economic organization. Am Econ Rev 62(5):777-795
2. Aoki M (2001) Toward a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge
3. Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading
4. Brousseau E (1999) Néo-institutionalisme et évolutionnisme: Quelles convergences? Econ Soc 35(1):189-215
5. Brunson MW, Yarrow DT, Roberts SD, Guynn DC Jr, Kuhns MR (1996) Non-industrial private forest owners and ecosystem management: Can they work together? J For 94(6):14-21
6. Dedeurwaerdere T (2006) The institutional economics of sharing biological information. Int Soc Sci J 188:351-368. doi: 10.1111/ j.1468-2451.2006.00623.x
7. Demaeyer W (2007) Coordinator Bosgroepen, interview with the policy official in charge of the forest groups. Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos, Brussels
8. Dorf M, Sabel C (1998) A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Rev 89(2):267-473. doi: 10.2307/1123411
9. Eggertsson T (2005) Imperfect institutions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
10. Gunningham N (2008) Regulatory reform and reflexive regulation: Beyond command and control. In: REFGOV working paper series, GPS-9, Louvain-la-Neuve
11. Haas E (1990) When knowledge is power: Three models of change in international organizations. University of California Press, Berkeley
12. Hajer MA, Wagenaar H (2003) Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13. Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J Econ 13(2):324-340. doi: 10.2307/3003457
14. Kittredge DB (2005) The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: International examples and potential application in the United States. For Policy Econ 7(4):671-688. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.12.004
15. North D (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, Princeton
16. Reinicke WH, Deng F (2000) Critical choices: The United Nations, networks and the future of global governance. International Development Research Council, Ottawa
17. Rydin Y, Matar T (2006) The new forest, England: Cooperative planning for a commons. In: Rydin Y, Falleth E (eds) Networks and institutions in natural resource management. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 34-56
18. Sabel C (1994) Learning by monitoring. In: Smelser N, Swedberg R (eds) The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton UP and Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton, pp 137-165
19. Serbruyns I, Luyssaert S (2006) Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management. For Policy Econ 9(3):285-296. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.012
20. Seynaeve J (2007) Coordinator Bosgroep Zuiderkempen, interview with the coordinator. Westerlo
21. Siebenhüner B (2002) How do scientific assessments learn? Part 1. Conceptual framework and case study of the IPCC. Environ Sci Policy 5:411-420. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00050-3
22. Tyler TR (1998) Trust and democratic governance. In: Braithwaite V, Levi M (eds) Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 269-294
23. Van Gossum P, De Maeyer W (2006) Performance of forest groups in achieving multifunctional forestry in Flanders. Small-Scale For Econ Manage Policy 5(1):19-36
24. Van Gossum P, Ledene L, Arts B, De Vreese R, Verheyen K (2008) Implementation failure of the forest expansion policy in Flanders and the policy learning potential. For Policy Econ 10(7-8):515-522. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.001
25. Verheyen K, Lust N, Carnol M, Hens L, Bouma JJ (2006) Feasibility of forests conversion: Ecological, social and economic aspects (Fefocon). Final report of SPSD II MA/04, Belgian Science Policy, Brussels