Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 285-296

  Serbruyns, Inge ^a   Luyssaert, Sebastiaan ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Belgium; Financial instruments; Incentives; Informational instruments; Non industrial private forest owners; Owner characteristics; Regulative instruments; Subsidies

Indexed keywords

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS; INFORMATIONAL INSTRUMENTS; OWNER CHARACTERISTICS; REGULATIVE INSTRUMENTS;

EDUCATION; PUBLIC POLICY;

FORESTRY;

ARCHIVAL PAPERS; EDUCATION; FORESTRY; INCENTIVES;

DAUCUS CAROTA;

EID: 33749236971     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Badola R. Attitudes of local people towards conservation and alternatives to forest resources: a case study from the lower Himalayas. Biodiversity and Conservation 7 (1998) 1245-1259
2. Birch T.W., Hodge S.S., and Thompson M.T. Characterizing Virginia's private forest owners and their forest lands. USDA Forest Service Research 10 (1998)
3. Bliss J.C., and Martin A.J. Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods. Forest Science 35 (1989) 601-622
4. Bliss J.C., and Martin A.J. How tree farmers view management incentives. Journal of Forestry 88 (1990) 23-29
5. Bliss, J.C., Brooks, R.T., Larsen, M.D., 1994. Attitudes in the Tennessee Valley region toward forest practices and policies. Auburn University, TVA, Gallup Org. Inc., 7.
6. Boyd R.G. Government support of nonindustrial production: the case of private forests. Southern Economic Journal 51 (1984) 89-107
7. Boyd R.G., and Hyde W.F. Forest Sector Intervention: The Impacts of Regulation on Social Welfare (1989), Iowa Stat university Press, Ames, Iowa
8. Brunson M.W., Yarrow D.T., Roberts S.D., Guynn Jr. D.C., and Kuhns M.R. Non-industrial private forest owners and ecosystem management: can they work together?. Journal of Forestry 94 (1996) 14-21
9. Campbell S.M., and Kittredge D.B. Ecosystem management on multiple NIPF ownership. Journal of Forestry 94 (1996) 24-29
10. Carmines E.G., and Zeller R.A. Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA
11. Cocklin C., and Doorman P. Ecosystem protection and management in New Zealand: a private land perspective. Applied Geography 14 (1994) 264-281
12. Conkin M.E. A forest industry view on data needs for policy decisions. In: Royer P.J., and Convery F.J. (Eds). Nonindustrial Private Forests: Data and Information Needs (1981), Convery, Durham 130
13. Dedrick, J.P., 1999. Private forest landowners in Virginia and ecosystem management: an analysis of attitudes and opportunities. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blackburg, Virginia, USA.
14. Dumortier M., Van de Aa B., Leyman A., Van Gossum P., and Serbruyns I. Bosbeleid. In: Dumortier M., De Bruyn L., Peymen J., Schneiders A., Van Daele T., Weyemberh G., van Straaten D., and Kuijken E. (Eds). Natuurrapport 2003 Toestand van de Natuur in Vlaanderen: Cijfers Voor Het Beleid. Mededelingen van het Instituut voor Natuurbehoud vol. 21 (2003) 244-256 Brussel, (in Dutch)
15. Egan A., and Jones S. Do landowner practices reflect beliefs? Implications of an extension-research partnership. Journal of Forestry 91 (1993) 39-45
16. Hamilton R.A., and Jones E.J. Extension leadership in issue-based programming: a North Carolina example. In: Baughman M.J., and Goodman N. (Eds). Proceedings: Symposium on Non-Industrial Private Forests: Learning from the Past, Prospects for the Future. Washington, DC, Feb. 18-20, 1996. Minnesota Extension Service (1996), University of Minnesota, Sint-Paul, MN, USA 49-53
17. Hyberg B.T., and Holthausen D.M. The behaviour of nonindustrial forest landowners. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19 (1989) 1014-1023
18. Kangas J., and Niemeläinen P. Opinion of forest owners and the public on forests and their use in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 11 (1996) 269-280
19. Karppinen H. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica 32 (1998) 43-59
20. Kilgore M.A., and Blinn C.R. Policy tools to encourage the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices in the United States and Canada. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004) 111-127
21. Kline J.D., Alig R.J., and Johnson R.L. Forest owner incentives to protect riparian habitat. Ecological Economics 33 (2000) 29-43
22. Kline J.D., Alig R.J., and Johnson R.L. Fostering the production of nontimber services among forest owners with heterogeneous objectives. Forest Science 46 (2000) 302-311
23. Klosowski R., Stevens T., Kittredge D., and Dennis D. Economic incentives for coordinated management of forest land: a case study of southern New England. Forest Policy and Economics 2 (2001) 29-38
24. Kluender R.A., Walkingsticks T.L., and Pickett J.C. The use of forestry incentives by nonindustrial forest landowner groups: is it time for a reassessment of where we spend our tax dollars?. Natural Resources 39 (1999) 799-818
25. Kuuluvainen J., Karppinen H., and Ovaskainen V. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. Forest Science 42 (1996) 300-309
26. Langholz J., Lassoie J., and Schelhas J. Incentives for biological conservation: Costa Rica's private wildlife refuge program. Conservation Biology 14 (2000) 1735-1743
27. Legendre P., and Legendre L. Numerical Ecology (1998), Elsevier, Amsterdam
28. Marty T.D., Kurtz W.B., and Gramann J.H. PNIF owner attitudes in the Midwest: a case study in Missouri and Wisconsin. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 5 (1988) 194-197
29. McColly R. Consulting forester's perspective. In: Baughman M.J., and Goodman N. (Eds). Proceedings: Symposium on Non-Industrial Private Forests: Learning from the Past, Prospects for the Future. Washington, DC, Feb. 18-20, 1996. Minnesota Extension Service (1996), University of Minnesota, Sint-Paul, MN, USA 34-36
30. Mehmood S.R., and Zhang D. Causes for continuation of state cost-share programs for nonindustrial private forest landowners. Forest Science 48 (2002) 471-478
31. Mutz R., Borchers J., and Becker G. Analysis of current and potential commitment of private forest owners in North Rhine-Westphalia based on the mixed Rasch model. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 121 (2002) 35-48
32. Pelkonen P., Pitkänen A., Schmidt P., Oesten G., Piussi P., and Rojas E. Forestry in Changing Societies in Europe (1999), University of Joensuu, Joensuu, Finland
33. Peterson T.R., and Horton C.C. Rooted in the soil: how understanding the perspectives of landowners can enhance the management of environmental disputes. Quarterly Journal of Speech 81 (1995) 139-166
34. Pietarinen J. Ihminen ja metsä: neljä perusasennetta. (in Finnish, with English summary). Silva Fennica 21 (1987) 323-331
35. Pinso C., and Vun R.Y. Incentives for forestry plantation projects in Sabah, Malaysia. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff 58 (2000) 202-210
36. Pregernig M. Values of forestry professionals and their implications for the applicability of policy instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 16 (2001) 278-288
37. Raedeke A.H., Nilon C.H., and Rikoon J.S. Factors affecting landowner participation in ecosystem management: a case study in south-central Missouri. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28 (2001) 195-206
38. Rickenbach M.G., Kittredge D.B., Dennis D., and Stevens T. Ecosystem management: capturing the concept for woodland owners. Journal of Forestry 26 (1998) 18-24
39. Rojas-Briales E. A Spanish experience: the forest plan of Catalonia and its consequences for private forest management. In: Gislerud O., and Neven I. (Eds). National Forest Programmes in a European Context. European Forest Institute Proceedings vol. 44 (2002) 93-98
40. Rosner, B., 2000. Fundamentals of biostatistics. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, USA.
41. Sample V.A. Building partnerships for ecosystem management on forest and range lands in mixed ownership. National Workshop Synthesis, New Haven, Connecticut, October 22-24, Forest Policy Center (1994) 17
42. Van Gossum P., Luyssaert S., Serbruyns I., and Mortier F. Forest groups as support to private owners in developing close-to-nature management. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 589-601
43. Washburn M.P. Cross boundary management on non-industrial private forests in Pennsylvania: a vision for the future. In: Baughman M.J., and Goodman N. (Eds). Proceedings: Symposium on Non-Industrial Private Forests: Learning from the Past, Prospects for the Future. Washington, DC, Feb. 18-20, 1996. Minnesota Extension Service (1996), University of Minnesota, Sint-Paul, MN, USA 63-68
44. Weber N. NEWFOR - New Forests for Europe: afforestation at the turn of the century. European Forest Institute Proceedings 35 (2000) 7-10
45. Wicker G. Motivation for private forest landowners. In: Wear D.N., and Greis J.G. (Eds). Southern Forest Resource Assessment. General Technical Report SRS-53 (2002), US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC 635
46. Windhoff-Héritier A. Wirksamkeitsbedingungen politischer Instrumente. In: Ellwein T., Hesse J., Mayntz R., and Scharpf F.W. (Eds). Jarbuch zur Staats-und Verwaltungswissenschaft (1989), Nomos, Baden-Baden 89-118
47. Zhang D., and Flick W.A. Sticks, carrots, and reforestation investment. Land Economics 77 (2001) 443-456