Nutrient digestibility and performance of broiler chickens fed regular or green canola biodiesel press cakes produced using a micro-scale process

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 89, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1307-1313

  Thacker, Philip A ^a   Petri, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biodiesel; Canola; Digestibility; Performance; Poultry; Press Cake

Indexed keywords

AVES; BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 67249136088     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3587     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Johnston MandHolloway T,Aglobal comparison of national biodiesel production potentials. Environ Sci Technol 41:7967-7973 (2007).
2. Hancock N, Biodiesel overview on global production and policy. [Online]. Government of Western Australia, Department of Agriculture and Food (2005). Available: www.agric.wa.gov.au/ content/sust/biofuel/200511 bdworldoverview.pdf [17 March 2009].
3. LichtFO, World Biodiesel Markets: The Outlook to 2010. Agra Informa, Tunbridge Wells, UK (2007).
4. Natural Resources Canada (2008). [Online]. Biodiesel: What is biodiesel? Available: http://www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca/transportation/ fuels/biodiesel/biodiesel. cfm [17 March 2009].
5. Koh LP, Potential habitat and biodiversity losses from intensified biodiesel feedstock production. Conserv Biol 21:1373-1375 (2007).
6. Anderson C, Count on canola for your biodiesel. Biofuels Canada 1:32-36 (2007).
7. Daun JK and Symons S, How green is green? Sampling and perception in assessing green seeds and chlorophyll in Canola. JAOCS 77:1209-1214 (2000).
8. Government of Saskatchewan (2008). [Online]. Frost and green seed in canola. Available: www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx? DN=bb79745e-e78a- 45af-80e7-79e9b7903a2e - 28k [17 March 2009].
9. Beshada E, Small D and Hodgkinson D, Challenges facing small and medium scale biodiesel production facilities in Western Canada, in Growing theMargin: Energy, Bioproducts from Farm and Food Sectors Conference, London, Ontario, 2 April (2008).
10. Kemp WH, Biodiesel Basics and Beyond: A Comprehensive Guide to Production and Use for the Home and Farm. Aztext Press, Tamworth, Ontario (2006).
11. Biofuels Canada, Abiola A, McDonald T, Vandenberg C, Gil S and Zenert B. Biodiesel production and demonstration. [Online]. Olds College School of Innovation, Olds, Alberta (2007). Available: http://www.oldscollege.ab.ca/ schools/ocsi/bioenergy/pdf/biodieselPoster- March2007.pdf [25 March 2009].
12. Canadian Grain Commission, Official Grain Grading Guide: Canola and Rapeseed. Canada Grain Commission Industry Services, Winnipeg, Manitoba (2007).
13. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, Vol. 1 (2nd edn). Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, Ontario (1993).
14. Schneider BHand Flatt WP, TheEvaluationof Feeds throughDigestibility Experiments. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA (1975).
15. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, OfficialMethods of Analysis (18th edn). AOAC, Washington, DC (2007).
16. Fenton TW and FentonM, An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and faeces. Can J Anim Sci 59:631-634 (1979).
17. ThiesW, Analysis of glucosinolates via 'on column' desulfation, in Analytical Chemistry of Rapeseed and its Products, ed. by Daun J, McGregor DI and McGregor EE. Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, pp. 66-71 (1980).
18. SAS Institute, SAS/STAT User's Guide: Release 9.1. SAS Institute,Cary,NC (2004).
19. National Research Council, Nutrient Requirements of Poultry (9th edn). National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1994).
20. Dale N and Batal A, Ingredient analysis table: 2007 edition. Feedstuffs Reference Issue and Buying Guide. Feedstuffs 78:16-23 (2007).
21. Novus, Raw Material Compendium: A Compilation of Worldwide Data Sources. Novus International, St Louis, MO (1994).
22. Keith MO and Bell JM, Composition and digestibility of canola press cake as a feedstuff for use in swine diets. Can J AnimSci 71:879-885 (1991).
23. Schone F, Kirchheim U, SchumannW and Ludke H, Apparent digestibility of high-fat rapeseed press cake in growing pigs and effects on feed intake, growth and weight of thyroid and liver. Anim Feed Sci Technol 62:97-110 (1996).
24. Hickling D, Canola Meal Feed Industry Guide (3rd edn). Canola Council of Canada,Winnipeg, Manitoba (2001).
25. Fowler DB and Downey RK, Lipid and morphological changes in developing rapeseed, Brassica napus. Can J Plant Sci 50:233-247 (1970).
26. Bell JM, Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal: a review. Can J AnimSci 73:679-697 (1993).
27. Tripathi MKandMishra AS,Glucosinolates inanimalnutrition:areview. Anim Feed Sci Technol 132:1-27 (2007).
28. Latshaw JD, Daily energy intake of broiler chickens is altered by proximate nutrient content and form of the diet. Poult Sci 87:89-95 (2008).
29. Schone F, Rudolph B, Kirchheim U and Knapp G, Counteracting the negative effects of rapeseed and rapeseed press cake in pig diets. Br J Nutr 78:947-962 (1997).
30. Thacker PA, Effect of micronization of full-fat canola seed on performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 71:89-97 (1998).
31. Leeson S, Slinger SJ and Summers JD, Utilization of whole tower rapeseed by laying hens and broiler chickens. Can J Anim Sci 58:55-61 (1978).
32. Summers JD, Shen H and Leeson S, The value of canola seed in poultry diets. Can J AnimSci 62:861-868 (1982).