Non-localization and localization roc analyses using clinically-based scoring

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 7263, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Paquerault, Sophie ^a   Samuelson, Frank W ^a   Myers, Kyle J ^a   Smith, Robert C ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; Location specific and non location specific receiver operating characteristic; Multiple reader multiple case (MRMC) analysis

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES; BACKGROUND IMAGE; CLINICAL PRACTICES; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; FIXED-SITE; GAUSSIAN SIGNALS; INTENSITY SIGNAL; LOCALIZATION ROCS; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MULTIPLE READER MULTIPLE CASE (MRMC) ANALYSIS; OBSERVER STUDIES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 67249122839     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.813761     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. S. Paquerault, F.W. Samuelson, N. Petrick, and K.J. Myers, "Comparing Signal-based and Case-based Methodologies for CAD Assessment in a Detection Task," Medical Imaging 2008: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. Edited by Sahiner, Berkman; Manning, David J. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 6917, pp. 691708- 691708-9 (2008).
2. D. Gur, "Objectively Measuring and Comparing Performance Levels of Diagnostic Imaging Systems and Practices," Acad Radiol 2007; 14:641-642. (Pubitemid 46898206)
3. R.F. Wagner, C.E. Metz, and G. Campbell, "Assessment of Medical Imaging Systems and Computer Aids: A Tutorial Review," Acad Radiol 2007; 14:723-748. (Pubitemid 46898203)
4. C. Beam, P.M. Layde, and D.C. Sullivan, "Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists," Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:209-213.
5. D.D. Dorfman, K.S. Berbaum, and C.E. Metz, "Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method," Invest Radiol 1992; 27(9):723-731.
6. D.P. Chakraborty, "A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm," Phys Med Biol 2006; 51(14):3449-3462. (Pubitemid 44026411)
7. R.G. Swensson, "Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images," Med Phys 1996; 23(10): 1709-1725.
8. S. Paquerault, D.I. Wade, N. Petrick, K.J. Myers, and F.W. Samuelson, "Observer evaluation of computer-aided detection: second reader versus concurrent reader scenario," Medical Imaging 2007: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. Edited by Jiang, Yulei; Sahiner, Berkman. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 6515, pp. 65151N (2007).
9. R.F. Wagner, S.V. Beiden, G. Campbell, C.E. Metz, and W.M. Sacks, "Assessment of Medical Imaging and Computer-assist Systems: Lessons from Recent Experience," Acad Radiol 2002; 9:1264-1277. (Pubitemid 35265398)