Comparing signal-based and case-based methodologies for CAD assessment in a detection task

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6917, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Paquerault, Sophie ^a   Samuelson, Frank W ^a   Petrick, Nicholas ^a   Myers, Kyle J ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; Free response receiver operating characteristics; Multiple reader multiple case (MRMC) analysis; Receiver operating characteristics

Indexed keywords

BACKGROUND IMAGES; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION (CAD); FALSE POSITIVE (FP); GAUSSIAN SIGNALS; IMAGE PERCEPTION; LOW INTENSITY; MAMMOGRAPHIC; OBSERVER PERFORMANCES; PERFORMANCE ANALYSES; READERS (USER EXPERIENCE); RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC); RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS (ROC) ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (TA);

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; CURVES (ROAD); IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MEDICAL IMAGING; MICROFLUIDICS; MULTITASKING; SIGNAL RECEIVERS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; TECHNOLOGY;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 44949205580     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.771498     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Smart, "A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility," International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access, 2006; pp1-6.
2. D.G. Fryback, and J.R. Thornbury, "The efficacy of diagnostic imaging," Med. Decis. Making 1991; 11: 88.
3. L. J. Warren Burhenne, S. A. Wood, C. J. D'Orsi, S. A. Feig, D. B. Kopans, K. F. O'Shaughnessy, E. A. Sickles, L. Tabar, C. J. Vyborny, R. A. Castellino, "Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography," Radiology 2000; 215:554-562.
4. R. F. Brem, J. Baum, M. Lechner, S. Kaplan, S. Souders, L. Gill Naul, and J. Hoffmeister, "Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: A multiinstitutional trial," AJR 2003; 181:687-693.
5. J. M. Ko, M. J. Nicholas, J. B. Mendel, and P. J. Slanetz, "Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography," AJR 2006; 187:1483-1491.
6. A. Malich, D. R. Fischer, and J. Bottcher, "CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments," Eur. Radiol. 2006; 16: 1449-1490.
7. T. W. Freer, and M. J. Ulissey, "Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center," Radiology 2001; 220:781-786.
8. D. Gur, J. H. Sumkin, H. E. Rockette, M. Ganott, C. Hakim, L. Hardesty, W. R. Poller, R. Shah, and L. Wallace, "Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system," Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004; 96:185-190.
9. J. J. Fenton, S. H. Taplin, P. A. Carney, L. Abraham, E. A. Sickles, C. J. D'Orsi, E. A. Berns, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, W. E. Barlow, and J. G. Elmore, "Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography," N Engl. J. Med. 2007; 356:1399-409.
10. R.F. Wagner, C.E. Metz, and G. Campbell, "Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: A tutorial review," Acad. Radiol. 2007; 14:723-748.
11. C. Beam, P.M. Layde and D.C. Sullivan, "Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists," Arch. Intern. Med. 1996; 156: 209-213.
12. E.J. Potchen, "Variation in diagnostic accuracy: Potential role of computer-aided diagnosis," in: K. Doi, H. MacMahon, M.L. Giger, and K.R. Hoffmann, Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Medical Imaging (Proc. of the First International Workshop on Computer-Aided Diagnosis), Elsevier (The Netherlands) 1999, pp 527-532.
13. D.P. Chakraborty, "The FROC, AFROC and DROC variants of the ROC analysis," in: J. Beutel, H.L. Kundel, R.L. Van Metter, eds. Handbook of medical imaging, Vol 1. Physics and psychophysics, Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, 2000; 771-796.
14. nd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, RSNA, Chicago, IL, December 2006.
15. S. Paquerault, D.I. Wade, N. Petrick, K.J. Myers, and F.W. Samuelson, "Observer Evaluation of Computer-Aided Detection: Second Reader versus Concurrent Reader Scenario," Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2007.
16. rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North, RSNA, Chicago, IL, December 2007.
17. B. Efron, and R. Tibshirani," Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy," Statistical Science 1986; 1(1):54-75.
18. F.W. Samuelson, and N. Petrick, "Comparing image detection algorithms using resampling," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2006; pp. 1312-1315.
19. D.P. Chakraborty, and K.S. Berbaum, "Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation," Med. Phys. 2004; 31:2313-2330.