Drive and sperm: The evolution and genetics of male meiotic drive

Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 471-506

  Presgraves, Daven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67149142494     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-372568-4.00012-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (185)

1. Ardlie K.G. Putting the brake on drive: meiotic drive of t haplotypes in natural populations of mice. Trends in Genetics 1998, 1114:189-193.
2. Ardlie K.G., Silver L.M. Low frequency of t haplotypes in natural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). Evolution 1998, 52:1185-1196.
3. Ashburner M., Golic K.G., Hawley R.S. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook 2005, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
4. Atlan A., Joly D., Capillon C., Montchamp-Moreau C. Sex-ratio distorter ofDrosophila simulans reduces male productivity and sperm competition ability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2004, 17:744-751.
5. Atlan A., Mercot H., Landre C., Montchamp-Moreau C. The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: geographic distribution of distortion and resistance. Evolution 1997, 51:1886-1895.
6. Babcock C.S., Anderson W.W. Molecular evolution of the sex-ratio inversion complex in Drosophila pseudoobscura: analysis of the esterase-5 gene region. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1996, 13:287-308.
7. Baudry E., Viginier B., Veuille M. Non-African populations of Drosophila melanogaster have a unique origin. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004, 21:1482-1491.
8. Bauer H., Willert J., Koschorz K., Hermann B.G. The t complex-encoded GTPase-activating protein Tagap1 acts as a transmission ratio distorter in mice. Nature Genetics 2005, 37:969-973.
9. Beckenbach A.T. The "sex-ratio" trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura: fertility relations of males and meiotic drive. American Naturalist 1978, 112:97-117.
10. Beckenbach A.T. Fitness analysis of the "sex-ratio" polymorphism in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. American Naturalist 1983, 121:630-648.
11. Beckenbach A.T. Selection and the "sex-ratio" polymorphism in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 1996, 50:787-794.
12. Beckenbach A.T., Curtsinger J.W., Policansky D. Fruitless experiments with fruit flies: the "sex-ratio" chromosomes of D. pseudoobscura. Drosophila Information Service 1982, 58:22.
13. Blanco-Rodriguez J. A matter of life and death: the significance of germ cell death during spermatogenesis. International Journal of Andrology 1998, 21:236-248.
14. Braden A.W.H., Erickson R.P., Gluecksohn-Waelsch S., Hartl D.L., Peacock W.J., Sandler L. A comparison of effects and properties of segregation distorting alleles in the mouse (t) and Drosophila (SD). Edinburgh Symposium on the Genetics of the Spermatozoon 1972, Bogtrykkeriet Forum, Copenhagen. R.A. Beatty, S. Gluecksohn-Waelsch (Eds.).
15. Brideau N.J., Flores H.A., Wang J., Maheshwari S., Wang X., Barbash D.A. Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 2006, 314:1292-1295.
16. Brittnacher J.G., Ganetzky B. On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Nature of enhancer of SD. Genetics 1984, 107:423-434.
17. Bruck D. Male segregation ratio advantage as a factor in maintaining lethal alleles in wild populations of house mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America of the United States of America 1957, 43:152-158.
18. Burt A., Trivers R.A. Genes in Conflict 2006, Harvard University Press.
19. Carroll L.S., Meagher S., Morrison L., Penn D.J., Potts W.K. Fitness effects of a selfish gene (the Mus t complex) are revealed in an ecological context. Evolution 2004, 58:1318-1328.
20. Carvalho A.B., Klaczko L.B. Autosomal suppressors of sex-ratio in Drosophila mediopunctata. Heredity 1993, 71:546-551.
21. Carvalho A.B., Klaczko L.B. Y-linked suppressors of the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila mediopunctata. Heredity 1994, 73:573-579.
22. Carvalho A.B., Vaz S.C. Are Drosophila SR drive chromosomes always balanced?. Heredity 1999, 83:221-228.
23. Casacuberta E., Pardue M.-L. Transposon telomeres are widely distributed inthe Drosophila genus: TART elements in the virilis group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America of the United States of America 2003, 100:3363-3368.
24. Caudron M., Bunt G., Bastiaens P., Karsenti E. Spatial coordination of spindle assembly by chromosome-mediated signaling gradients. Science 2005, 309:1373-1376.
25. Cazemajor M., Joly D., Montchamp-Moreau C. Sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans is related to equational nondisjunction of the Y chromosome. Genetics 2000, 154:229-236.
26. Chang H.-Y., Ayala F.J. On the origin of incipient reproductive isolation: the case of Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta. Evolution 1989, 43:1610-1624.
27. Charlesworth B. The evolution of lethals in the T-haplotype system of the mouse. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1994, 258:101-107.
28. Charlesworth B., Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Meiotic drive and unisexual hybrid sterility - a comment. Genetics 1993, 133:421-424.
29. Charlesworth B., Hartl D.L. Population dynamics of the segregation distorter polymorphism of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1978, 89:171-192.
30. Cosmides L.M., Tooby J. Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1981, 89:83-129.
31. Coyne J.A. Meiotic segregation and male recombination in interspecific hybrids of Drosophila. Genetics 1986, 114:485-494.
32. Coyne J.A., Charlesworth B., Orr H.A. Haldane's rule revisited. Evolution 1991, 45:1710-1714.
33. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Two rules of speciation. Speciation and Its Consequences 1989, 180-207. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. D. Otte, J. Endler (Eds.).
34. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Further evidence against meiotic-drive models of hybrid sterility. Evolution 1993, 47:685-687.
35. Crow J.F. Why is Mendelian segregation so exact?. BioEssays 1991, 13:305-312.
36. Curtsinger J.W., Feldman M.W. Experimental and theoretical analysis of the "sex-ratio" polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 1980, 94:445-466.
37. de Villena F.P.M., Sapienza C. Female meiosis drive karyotypic evolution in mammals. Genetics 2001, 159:1179-1189.
38. de Villena F.P.M., Sapienza C. Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mammalian Genome 2001, 12:331-339.
39. Dean M.D., Ballard J.W.O. Linking phylogenetics with population genetics toreconstruct the geographic origin of a species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2004, 32:998-1009.
40. Dermitzakis E.T., Masly J.P., Waldrip H.M., Clark A.G. Non-Mendelian segregation of sex chromosomes in heterospecific Drosophila males. Genetics 2000, 154:687-694.
41. Derome N., Metayer K., Montchamp-Moreau C., Veuille M. Signature ofselective sweep associated with the evolution of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 2004, 1166:1357-1366.
42. Dobzhansky T. Facts and problems of the "sex-ratio" condition in Drosophila. Scientia Genetica 1939, 11:67-75.
43. Dunn L.C., Bennett D. Lethal alleles near locus T in house mouse populations on the Jutland peninsula, Denmark. Evolution 1971, 25:451-453.
44. Dunn L.C., Bennett D., Cookingham J. Polymorphisms for lethal alleles in European populations of Mus musculus. Journal of Mammology 1973, 54:822-830.
45. Dyer K., Charlesworth B., Jaenike J. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:1587-1592.
46. Eshel I. Evolutionary genetic stability of Mendelian segregation and the role of free recombination in the chromosomal system. American Naturalist 1985, 125:412-420.
47. Faulhaber S.H. An abnormal sex ratio in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 1967, 56:189-213.
48. Fisher R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 1930, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. Fowler G.L. Some aspects of the reproductive biology of Drosophila: sperm transfer, sperm storage, and sperm utilization. Advances in Genetics 1973, 17:293-360.
50. Frank S.A. Haldane's rule: a defense of the meiotic drive theory. Evolution 1991, 45:1714-1716.
51. Frank S.H. Divergence of meiotic drive-suppressors as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 1991, 45:262-267.
52. Fry C.L., Wilkinson G.S. Sperm survival in female stalk-eyed flies depends on seminal fluid and meiotic drive. Evolution 2004, 58:1622-1626.
53. Fuller M.T. Spermatogenesis. The Development of Drosophila melanogaster 1993, 71-147. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. M. Bate, A. Martinez Arias (Eds.).
54. Gershenson S. A new sex ratio abnormality in Drosophila obscura. Genetics 1928, 13:488-507.
55. Haig D., Bergstrom C.T. Multiple mating, sperm competition, and meiotic drive. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1995, 8:265-282.
56. Haig D., Grafen A. Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1991, 153:531-558.
57. Haldane J.B.S. The Causes of Evolution 1932, Longmans, Green & Co., Ltd, New York.
58. Hall D.W. Meiotic drive and sex chromosome cycling. Evolution 2004, 58:925-931.
59. Hamblin M.T., Veuille M. Population structure among African and derived populations of D. simulans: evidence for ancient subdivision and recent admixture. Genetics 1999, 153:305-317.
60. Hamilton W.D. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 1967, 156:477-488.
61. Hammer M.F., Schimenti J., Silver L.M. Evolution of mouse chromosome 17 and the origin of inversions associated with t haplotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1989, 86:3261-3265.
62. Hammer M.F., Silver L.M. Phylogenetic analysis of the alpha-globin pseudogene-4 (Hba-ps4) locus in the house mouse species complex reveals a stepwise evolution of t haplotypes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1993, 10:971-1001.
63. Hartl D.L. Dysfunctional sperm production in Drosophila melanogaster males homozygous for the segregation distorter elements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1969, 63:782-789.
64. Hartl D.L. Genetic dissection of segregation distortion. I. Suicide combinations of SD genes. Genetics 1974, 76:477-486.
65. Hartl D.L., Hiraizumi Y. Segregation distortion. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila melanogaster 1976, Academic Press, New York. E. Novitski, M. Ashburner (Eds.).
66. Hartl D.L., Hiraizumi Y., Crow J.F. Evidence for sperm dysfunction as the mechanism of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1967, 58:2240-2245.
67. Hasson E., Eanes W.F. Contrasting histories of three gene regions associated with In(3L)Payne of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1996, 144:1565-1575.
68. Hauschteck-Jungen E., Hartl D.L. Defective histone transition during spermiogenesis in heterozygous segregation distorter males of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1982, 101:57-69.
69. Hauschteck-Jungen E., Mauer B. Sperm dysfunction in sex-ratio males of Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 1976, 46:459-477.
70. Henikoff S., Ahmad K., Malik H.S. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 2001, 293:1098-1102.
71. Henikoff S., Malik H.S. Centromeres: selfish drivers. Nature 2002, 417:227.
72. Hense W., Baines J.F., Parsch J. X chromosome inactivation during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Public Library of Science Biology 2007, 5:2288-2295.
73. Hermann B.G., Koschorz K., Wertz K., McLaughlin K.J., Kispert A. A protein kinase encoded by the t complex responder gene causes non-Mendelian inheritance. Nature 1999, 402:141-146.
74. Hiraizumi Y., Martin D.W., Eckstrand I.A. A modified model of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1980, 95:693-706.
75. Huang S.-W., Ardlie K.G., Yu H.-T. Frequency and distribution of t-haplotypes in the Southeast Asian house mouse in Taiwan. Molecular Ecology 2001, 10:2349-2354.
76. Hurst G.D.D., Werren J.H. The role of selfish genetic elements in eukaryotic evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 2001, 2:597-606.
77. Hurst L.D., Pomiankowski A. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics 1991, 128:841-858.
78. Jaenike J. Sex-ratio meiotic drive in the Drosophila quinaria group. American Naturalist 1996, 148:237-254.
79. Jaenike J. Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2001, 32:25-49.
80. James, A. C. 1992. Sex ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila neotestacea. Biology Department. Rochester, NY, University of Rochester. Ph.D.
81. Johnson N.A., Wu C.-I. An empirical test of the meiotic drive models of hybrid sterility: sex ratio data from hybrids between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia. Genetics 1992, 130:507-511.
82. Jutier D., Derome N., Montchamp-Moreau C. The sex-ratio trait and its evolution in Drosophila simulans: a comparative approach. Genetica 2004, 120:87-89.
83. Katz D.F., Erickson R.P., Nathanson M. Beat frequency is bimodally distributed in spermatozoa from T/t12 mice. Journal of Experimental Zoology 1979, 210:529-535.
84. Kaufmann B.P., Demerec M. Utilization of sperm by the female Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturalist 1942, 76:445-460.
85. Keith T.P. Frequency distribution of esterase-5 alleles in two populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 1983, 105:135-155.
86. Kelly W.G., Schaner C.E., Dernburg A.F., Lee M.-H., Kim S.K., Villeneuve A.M., Reinke V. X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development 2002, 129:479-492.
87. Klein J., Sipos P., Figueroa F. Polymorphism of t-complex genes in European wild mice. Genetical Research 1984, 44:39-46.
88. Kliman R.M., Andolfatto P., Coyne J.A., Depaulis F., Kreitman M., Berry A.J., McCarter J., Wakeley J., Hey J. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics 2000, 156:1913-1931.
89. Kovacevic M., Schaeffer S.W. Molecular population genetics of X-linked genes in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 2000, 156:155-172.
90. Kusano A., Staber C., Chan H.Y.E., Ganetzky B. Closing the (Ran)GAP on segregation distortion in Drosophila. BioEssays 2003, 25:108-115.
91. Kusano A., Staber C., Ganetzky B. Nuclear mislocalization of enzymatically active RanGAP causes segregation distortion in Drosophila. Developmental Cell 2001, 1:351-361.
92. Lachaise D., Silvain J.-F. How two Afrotropical endemics made two cosmopolitan human commensals: the Drosophila melanogaster-D. simulans palaeogeographic riddle. Genetica 2004, 120:17-39.
93. Lande R., Wilkinson G.S. Models of sex-ratio meiotic drive and sexual selection in stalk-eyed flies. Genetical Research 1999, 74:245-253.
94. Lefevre G., Jonsson U.B. Sperm transfer, storage, displacement and utilization in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1962, 47:1719-1736.
95. Lenington S., Egid K. Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T locus: a response to T-locus or H-2-locus variability?. Behavior Genetics 1985, 15:53-67.
96. Lenington S., Franks P., Williams J. Distribution of t-haplotypes in natural populations of wild house mice. Journal of Mammology 1988, 69:489-499.
97. Lewontin R.C. Interdeme selection controlling a polymorphism in the house mouse. American Naturalist 1962, 96:65-78.
98. Liberman U. Modifier theory of meiotic drive: is Mendelian segregation stable?. Theoretical Population Biology 1976, 10:127-132.
99. Lifschytz E., Lindsley D.L. The role of the X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1972, 69:182-186.
100. Lindsley D.L., Grell E.H. Spermiogenesis without chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1969, 61:69-78.
101. Lyon M.F. Transmission ratio distortion in mouse t-haplotypes is due to multiple distorter genes acting on a responder locus. Cell 1984, 44:357-363.
102. Lyon M.F. Transmission ratio distortion in mice. Annual Review of Genetics 2003, 37:393-408.
103. Lyon M.F., Phillips R.J.S. Crossing over in mice heterozygous for t-alleles. Heredity 1959, 13:23-32.
104. Lyttle T.W. Experimental population genetics of meiotic drive systems. II. Accumulation of genetic modifiers of segregation distorter (SD) in laboratory populations. Genetics 1979, 91:339-357.
105. Lyttle T.W. Segregation distorters. Annual Review of Genetics 1991, 25:511-557.
106. Lyttle T.W. Cheaters sometimes prosper: distortion of Mendelian segregation by meiotic drive. Trends in Genetics 1993, 9:205-210.
107. Mange E.J. Temperature sensitivity of segregation-distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1968, 58:399-413.
108. Martin-DeLeon P.A., Zhang H., Morales C.R., Zhao Y., Rulon M., Barnoski B.L., Chen H., Galileo D.S. Spam1-associated transmission ratio distortion in mice: elucidating the mechanism. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2005, 3:32.
109. Masly J.P., Presgraves D.C. High-resolution genome-wide dissection of thetworules of speciation in Drosophila. Public Library of Science Biology 2007, 5:1890-1898.
110. Mercot H., Atlan A., Jacques M., Montchamp-Moreau C. Sex-ratio distortion in Drosophila simulans: co-occurrence of a meiotic drive and a suppressor of drive. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1995, 8:283-300.
111. Merrill C., Bayraktaroglu L., Kusano A., Ganetzky B. Truncated RanGAP encoded by the segregation distorter locus of Drosophila. Science 1999, 283:1742-1745.
112. Mery F., Joly D. Multiple mating, sperm transfer and oviposition pattern in the giant sperm species, Drosophila bifurca. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2002, 15:49-56.
113. Minakhina S., Myers R., Druzhinina M., Steward R. Crosstalk between the actin cytoskeleton and Ran-mediated nuclear transport. BMC Cell Biology 2005, 6:32.
114. Montchamp-Moreau C., Ginhoux V., Atlan A. The Y chromosomes of Drosophila simulans are highly polymorphic for their ability to suppress sex-ratio drive. Evolution 2001, 55:728-737.
115. Montchamp-Moreau C., Joly D. Abnormal spermiogenesis is associated with the X-linked sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans. Heredity 1997, 79:24-30.
116. Montchamp-Moreau C., Ogereau D., Chaminade N., Colard A., Aulard S. Organization of the sex-ratio meiotic drive region in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 2006, 166:1357-1366.
117. Morita T., Kubota H., Murata K., Nozaki M., Delarbre C., Willison K., Satta Y., Sakaizumi M., Takahata N., Gachelin G. Evolution of the mouse t haplotype: recent and worldwide introgression to Mus musculus. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1992, 89:6851-6855.
118. Muller H.J., Settles F. The nonfunctioning of genes in spermatozoa. Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- Vererbungslehre 1927, 43:285-312.
119. Nielsen R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annual Review of Genetics 2005, 39:197-218.
120. Nielsen R., Bustamante C.D., Clark A.G., Glanowski S., Sackton T.B., Hubisz M.J., Fledel-Alon A., Tanenbaum D.M., Civello D., White T.J., Sninsky J., Adams M.D., Cargill M. A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees. Public Library of Science Biology 2005, 3:976-985.
121. Novitski E. Genetic analysis of an anomalous sex ratio condition in Drosophila affinis. Genetics 1947, 32:526-534.
122. Novitski E., Peacock W.J., Engel J. Cytological basis of "sex-ratio" in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Science 1965, 148:516-517.
123. Olds-Clarke P. Models for male infertility: the t haplotypes. Reproduction 1997, 2:157-164.
124. Olds-Clarke P., Peitz B. Fertility of sperm from +/t mice: evidence that +-bearing sperm are dysfunctional. Genetical Research 1985, 47:49-52.
125. Ometto L., Glinka S., DeLorenzo D., Stephan W. Inferring the effects of demography and selection on Drosophila melanogaster populations from a chromosome-wide scan of DNA variation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005, 22:2119-2130.
126. Orr H.A., Irving S. Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility inthe Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization. Genetics 2001, 158(3):1089-1100.
127. Orr H.A., Irving S. Segregation distortion in hybrids between the Bogota and USA subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 2005, 169:671-682.
128. Orr H.A., Presgraves D.C. Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules. Bioessays 2000, 22:1085-1094.
129. Palopoli M.F. Genetic partners in crime: evolution of ultraselfish supergene that specializes in sperm sabotage. Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process 2000, 113-128. Oxford University Press, New York. J.B. Wolf, E.D. Brodie, M.J. Wade (Eds.).
130. Palopoli M.F., Wu C.-I. Rapid evolution of a coadapted gene complex: evidence from the segregation distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1996, 143:1675-1688.
131. Peacock W.J., Tokuyasu K., Hardy R.W. Spermiogenesis and meiotic drive in Drosophila. Edinburgh Symposium on the Genetics of the Spermatozoon 1972, 247-268. Bogtrykkeriet Forum, Copenhagen. R.A. Beatty, S. Gluecksohn-Waelsch (Eds.).
132. Pitnick S., Markow T.A., Spicer G.S. Delayed male maturity is a cost of producing large sperm in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1995, 92:10614-10618.
133. Policansky D., Dempsey B. Modifiers and 'sex ratio' in Drosophilia pseudoobscura. Evolution 1978, 32:922-924.
134. Policansky D., Ellison J. "Sex ratio" in Drosophila pseudoobscura: spermiogenic failure. Science 1970, 169:888-889.
135. Prakash S. Origin of reproductive isolation in the absence of apparent genic differentiation in a geographic isolate of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 1972, 72:143-155.
136. Prakash S. Gene differences between the sex-ratio and standard gene arrangements of the X chromosome and linkage disequilibrium between loci in the standard genearrangement of the X chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 1974, 77:795-804.
137. Prakash S., Merritt R.B. Direct evidence of genic differentiation between sex ratio and standard gene arrangements of X chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 1972, 72:169-175.
138. Presgraves D.C. Does genetic conflict drive molecular evolution of nuclear transport genes in Drosophila?. BioEssays 2007, 29:386-391.
139. Presgraves D.C. Speciation genetics: epistasis, conflict and the origin of species. Current Biology 2007, 17:R125-R127.
140. Presgraves D.C., Severence E., Wilkinson G.S. Sex chromosome meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies. Genetics 1997, 147:1169-1180.
141. Presgraves D.C., Stephan W. Pervasive adaptive evolution among interactors of the Drosophila hybrid inviability gene, Nup96. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007, 24:306-314.
142. Ramamurthy G., Alfert M., Stern C. Ultrastructural studies on spermatogenesis in a sex-ratio-mutant strain of Drosophila simulans. American Journal of Anatomy 1980, 157:205-219.
143. Ruvinsky A., Polyakov A., Agulnik A., Tichy H., Figueroa F., Klein J. Low diversity of t haplotypes in the eastern form of the house mouse, Mus musculus L. Genetics 1991, 127:161-168.
144. Sandler L., Hiraizumi Y. Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Instability at the segregation-distorter locus. Genetics 1960, 45:1269-1287.
145. Sandler L., Hiraizumi Y., Sandler I. Meiotic drive in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. I. The cytogenetic basis of segregation distortion. Genetics 1959, 44:232-250.
146. Sandler L., Novitski E. Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. American Naturalist 1957, 91:105-110.
147. Schaeffer S.W., Miller Nucleotide sequence analysis of Adh genes estimates the time of geographic isolation of the Bogota population of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1991, 88:6097-6101.
148. Sharp C.B., Hilliker A.J., Holm D.G. Further characterization of genetic elements associated with the segregation distorter phenomenon in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1985, 110:671-688.
149. Silver L.M. Mouse t haplotypes. Annual Review of Genetics 1985, 19:179-208.
150. Silver L.M. The peculiar journey of a selfish chromosome: mouse t haplotypes and meiotic drive. Trends in Genetics 1993, 9:250-254.
151. Silver L.M., Hammer M.F., Fox H., Garrels J., Bucan M., Hermann B., Frischauf A.-M., Lehrach H., Winking H., Figueroa F., Klein J. Molecular evidence forthe rapid propagation of mouse t haplotypes from a single, recent, ancestral chromosome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1987, 4:473-482.
152. Silver L.M., Olds-Clarke P. Transmission ratio distortion of mouse t-haplotypes is not a consequence of wild-type sperm degeneration. Developmental Biology 1984, 105:250-252.
153. Stalker H.D. The genetic systems modifying meiotic drive in Drosophila paramelanica. Genetics 1961, 46:177-202.
154. Sturtevant A.H., Dobzhansky T. Geographical distribution and cytology of "sex ratio" in Drosophila pseudoobscura and related species. Genetics 1936, 21:473-490.
155. Tamura K., Subramanian S., Kumar S. Temporal patterns of fruitfly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004, 21:36-44.
156. Tao Y., Araripe L., Kingan S.B., Ke Y., Xiao H., Hartl D.L. A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. II. An X-linked distorter. Public Library of Science Biology 2007, 5:e293.
157. Tao Y., Hartl D.L. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybridincompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution 2003, 57:2580-2589.
158. Tao Y., Hartl D.L., Laurie C.C. Sex-ratio segregation distortion associated with reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98:13183-13188.
159. Tao Y., Masly J.P., Araripe L., Ke Y., Hartl D.L. A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. I. An autosomal suppressor. Public Library of Science Biology 2007, 5:e292.
160. Taylor D.R. Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals. Genetica 2003, 117:27-35.
161. Taylor J.E., Jaenike J. Sperm competition and the dynamics of X chromosome drive stability and extinction. Genetics 2002, 160:1721-1731.
162. Temin R.G. The independent distorting ability of enhancer of segregation distorter, E(SD), in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1991, 1128:339-356.
163. Temin R.G., Ganetzky B., Powers P.A., Lyttle T.W., Pimpinelli S., Wu C.-I., Hiraizumi Y. Segregation distorter (SD) in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic and molecular analysis. American Naturalist 1990, 137:287-331.
164. Temin R.G., Marthas M. Factors influencing the effect of segregation distortion in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1984, 107:375-393.
165. Thomson G.J., Feldman M.W. Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. II. Linkage modification in the segregation distorter system. Theoretical Population Biology 1974, 5:155-162.
166. Thomson G.J., Feldman M.W. Population genetics and modifiers of meiotic drive. III. Equilibrium analysis of a general model for the genetic control of segregation distortion. Theoretical Population Biology 1976, 10:10-25.
167. Thornton K., Andolfatto P. Approximate Bayesian inference reveals evidence for a recent, severe, bottleneck in non-African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2006, 172:1607-1619.
168. Turelli M., Orr H.A. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 2000, 154:1663-1679.
169. Vaz S.C., Carvalho A.B. Evolution of autosomal suppression of the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila. Genetics 2004, 166:265-277.
170. Wallace B. Studies on 'sex-ratio' in Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Selection and 'sex-ratio'. Evolution 1948, 2:189-217.
171. Wang R.-L., Wakeley J., Hey J. Gene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Genetics 1997, 147:1091-1106.
172. Weis K. Regulating access to the genome: nucleocytoplasmic transport throughout the cell cycle. Cell 2003, 112:441-451.
173. Wilkinson G.S., Fry C.L. Meiotic drive alters sperm competitive ability in stalk-eyed flies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2001, 268:2559-2564.
174. Wilkinson G.S., Presgraves D.C., Crymes L. Male eyespan in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 1998, 391:276-279.
175. Wilkinson G.S., Sanchez M. Sperm development, age and sex chromosome meiotic drive in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis whitei. Heredity 2001, 87:17-24.
176. Wilkinson G.S., Swallow J.G., Christensen S.J., Madden K. Phylogeography of sex ratio and multiple mating in stalk-eyed flies from southeast Asia. Genetica 2003, 117:37-46.
177. Wilkinson G.S., Johns P.M., Kelleher E.S., Muscedere M.L., Lorsong A. Fitness effects of X chromosome drive in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2006, 19:1851-1860.
178. Willison K.R., Dudley K., Potter J. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a haploid expressed gene encoding t complex polypeptide 1. Cell 1986, 44:727-738.
179. Wood R.J., Newton M.E. Sex-ratio distortion caused by meiotic drive in mosquitoes. American Naturalist 1991, 137:379-391.
180. Wu C.-I. Virility deficiency and the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Sperm displacement and sexual selection. Genetics 1983, 105:651-662.
181. Wu C.-I. Virility deficiency and the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura. II. Multiple mating and overall virility selection. Genetics 1983, 105:663-679.
182. Wu C.-I., Hammer M.F. Molecular evolution of ultraselfish genes of meiotic drive systems. Evolution at the Molecular Level 1991, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. R.K. Selander, A.G. Clark, T.S. Whittam (Eds.).
183. Wu C.-I., Lyttle T.W., Wu M.-L., Lin G.F. Association between DNA satellite sequences and the responder of segregation distortion in D. melanogaster. Cell 1988, 54:179-189.
184. Yang Y.-Y., Lin F.-J., Chang H.-Y. Sex ratio distortion in hybrids of Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta. Zoological Studies 2004, 43:622-628.
185. Zimmering S., Sandler L., Nicoletti B. Mechanisms of meiotic drive. Annual Review of Genetics 1970, 4:409-436.