Reviving the milgram obedience paradigm in the era of informed consent

Psychological Record

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 155-170

  Navarick, Douglas J ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67149118028     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395656     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. AGRESTI, A., & COULL, B. A. (1998). Approximation is better than exact for interval estimation of binomial populations. The American Statistician, 52, 119-126.
2. ATRAN, S. (2003). Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science, 299, 1534-1539.
3. BLASS, T. (1991). Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 398-413.
4. FANTINO, E. (1969). Choice and rate of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 723-730.
5. FANTINO, E. (2000). Delay reduction theory-the case for temporal context: Comment on Grace and Sevastano (2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 444-446.
6. FANTINO, E., PRESTON, R. A., & DUNN, R. (1993). Delay reduction: Current status. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 159-169.
7. FISKE, S. T., HARRIS, L. T., & CUDDY, A. J. C. (2004). Why ordinary people torture enemy prisoners. Science, 306, 1482-1483.
8. GELLER, D. M. (1978). Involvement in role-playing simulations: A demonstration with studies on obedience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 219-235.
9. HARBER, K. D., ZIMBARDO, P. G., & BOYD, J. N. (2003). Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 255-264.
10. KAMIN, L. J. (1956). Effects of termination of the CS and avoidance of the US on avoidance learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 49, 420-424.
11. MICHAEL, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149-155.
12. MICHAEL, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401-410.
13. MILGRAM, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
14. MILGRAM, S. (1965a). Liberating effects of group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 127-134.
15. MILGRAM, S. (1965b). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57-76.
16. MILGRAM, S. (2004). Obedience to authority. New York: Perennial Classics. (Original work published 1974)
17. MOWRER, O. H. (1947). On the dual nature of learning: A re-interpretation of "conditioning" and "problem-solving." Harvard Educational Review, 17, 102-148.
18. NAVARICK, D. J. (1982). Negative reinforcement and choice in humans. Learning and Motivation, 13, 361-377.
19. NAVARICK, D. J. (1996). Choice in humans: Techniques for enhancing sensitivity to reinforcement immediacy. The Psychological Record, 46, 539-554.
20. NAVARICK, D. J. (2001). Control of impulsive choice through biasing instructions. The Psychological Record, 51, 549-560.
21. NAVARICK, D. J. (2004). Analysis of impulsive choice: Assessing effects of implicit instructions. The Psychological Record, 54, 505-522.
22. NAVARICK, D. J. (2007). Attenuation and enhancement of compliance with experimental demand characteristics. The Psychological Record, 57, 501-515.
23. NAVARICK, D. J., & FANTINO, E. (1976). Self-control and general models of choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 75-87.
24. ORNE, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
25. ORNE, M. T. (1970). Hypnosis, motivation, and the ecological validity of the psychological experiment. In W. J. Arnold & M. M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 187-265). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
26. SLATER, M., ANTLEY, A., DAVISON, A., SWAPP, D., GUGER, C, BARKER, C, PISTRANG, N., & SANCHEZ-VIVES, M. V. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram experiments. PIoS One, 1: e39. Retrieved August 18, 2008 from http://www.plosone.Org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal. pone.0000039
27. ZIMBARDO, P. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.