Rice polish for the removal of arsenic from aqueous solution: Optimization of process variables

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 4194-4201

  Hasan, S H ^a   Ranjan, D ^a   Talat, M ^b  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; BIOSORBENT; BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN; CUMULATIVE EFFECTS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; MAIN EFFECT; METAL CONCENTRATIONS; METAL ION CONCENTRATION; POSITIVE EFFECTS; PROCESS VARIABLES; REGRESSION COEFFICIENT; RICE POLISH; SECOND-ORDER POLYNOMIAL; SEM; SORPTION PROCESS;

ARSENIC; BIOMASS; CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); METAL IONS; METAL RECOVERY; OPTIMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SORPTION; THERMAL EFFECTS;

PH EFFECTS;

EID: 67049160675     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie801822d     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mandal, B. K.; Suzuki, K. T. Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 2002, 58, 201-235.
2. Ng, J. C.; Wang, J.; Shraim, A. A global health problem caused by arsenic from natural sources. Chemosphere 2003, 52, 1353-1359.
3. Kundu, S.; Gupta, A. K. Analysis and modeling of fixed bed column operations on As (V) removal by adsorption onto iron oxide-coated cement (IOCC). Colloid Surf. A 2005, 290, 52-60.
4. Kundu, S.; Gupta, A. K. Investigations on the adsorption efficiency of iron oxide coated cement (IOCC) towards As (V) -kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Colloid Surf. A 2006, 273, 121-128.
5. Niu, C. H.; Volesky, B.; Cleiman, D. Biosorption of arsenic (V) with acid-washed crab shells. Water Res. 2007, 41 (11), 2473-2478.
6. Choonga, T. S. Y.; Chuaha, T. G.; Robiaha, Y.; Gregory Koaya, F. L.; Azni, I. Arsenic toxicity, health hazards and removal techniques from water: an overview. Desalination 2007, 217, 139-166.
7. Mohan, D.; Pittman, C. U., Jr.; Bricka, M.; Smith, F.; Yancey, B.; Mohammad, J.; Steele, P. H.; Alexandre-Franco, M. F.; Gómez-Serrano, V.; Gong, H. Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 310 (1), 57-73.
8. Kumari, P.; Sharma, P.; Srivastava, S.; Srivastava, M. M. Biosorption studies on shelled Moringa oleifera Lamarck seed powder: Removal and recovery of arsenic from aqueous system. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2006, 78, 131-139.
9. Mohan, D.; Pittman, C. U., Jr. Arsenic removal from water /wastewater using adsorbents-A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 142, 1-53.
10. Volesky, B. Detoxification of met al.-bearing effluents: biosorption for the next century. Hydromet al.lurgy 2001, 59, 203-216.
11. Ishikawa, S.-I.; Sekine, S.; Miura, N.; Suyama, K.; Arihara, K.; Itoh, M. Removal of selenium and arsenic by animal biopolymer. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2004, 102, 113-127.
12. Kamala, C. T.; Chu, K. H.; Chary, N. S.; Pandey, P. K.; Ramesh, S. L.; Sastry, A. R. K.; Chandra Sekhar, K. Removal of arsenic (III) from aqueous solutions using fresh and immobilized plant biomass. Water Res. 2005, 39, 2815-2826.
13. Pokhrel, D.; Viraraghavan, T. Arsenic removal from an aqueous solution by modified A. niger biomass: Batch kinetic and isotherm studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 150, 818-825.
14. Dupont, L.; Jolly, G.; Aplincourt, M. Arsenic adsorption on lignocellulosic substrate loaded with ferric ion. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2007, 5, 125-129.
15. Rahaman, M. S.; Basu, A.; Islam, M. R. The removal of As (III) and As (V) from aqueous solutions by waste materials. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99 (8), 2815-2823.
16. erÁanský, S.; Urík, M.; Ševc, J.; Khun, M. Biosorption and biovolatilization of arsenic by heat resistant fungi. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2007, 14 (1), 31-35.
17. Oke, I. A.; Olarinoye, N. O.; Adewusi, S. R. A. Adsorption kinetics for arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by untreated powdered eggshell. Adsorption 2008, 14, 73-83.
18. Pandey, P. K.; Choubey, S.; Verma, Y.; Pandey, M.; Chandrashekhar, K. Biosorptive removal of arsenic from drinking water. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 634-637.
19. Box, G. E. P.; Hunter, J. S. Multifactor experimental design for exploring response surfaces. Ann. Math. Stat. 1957, 28, 195-241.
20. Preetha, B.; Viruthagiri, T. Application of response surface methodology for the biosorption of copper using Rhizopus arrhizus. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 143, 506-510.
21. Ravikumar, K.; Ramalingam, S.; Krishnan, S.; Balu, K. Application of response surface methodology to optimize the process variables for Reactive Red and Acid Brown dye removal using a novel adsorbent. Dyes Pigments 2006, 70, 18-26.
22. Jeffery, G. H.; Bassett, J.; Mendham, J.; Denney, R. C. Vogel's Textbook of Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 5th ed.; Bath Press Ltd.: U. K., 1989.
23. Annadurai, G.; Sheeja, R. Y. Use of Box-Behnken design of experiments for the adsorption of verofix red using biopolymer. Bioprocess Eng. 1998, 18, 463-466.
24. Tan, I. A. W.; Ahmad, A. L.; Hameed, B. H. Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbons from coconut husk using response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 137, 462-470.
25. Azargohar, R.; Dalai, A. K. Production of activated carbon from Luscar char: Experimental and modeling studies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2005, 85, 219-225.
26. Nazzal, S.; Khan, M. A. Response Surface Methodology for the Optimization of Ubiquinone Self-Nanoemulsified Drug Delivery System. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2002, 3 (1), 1-9.
27. Aslan, N.; Cebeci, Y. Application of Box-Behnken design and response surface methodology for modeling of some Turkish coals. Fuel 2007, 86, 90-97.
28. Ferreira, S. L. C.; Bruns, R. E.; Ferreira, H. S.; Matos, G D.; David, J. M.; Brandão, G. C.; da Silva, E. G. P.; Portugal, L. A.; dos Reis, P. S.; Souza, A. S.; dos Santos, W. N. L. Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Angl. Chim. Acta 2007, 597, 179-186.
29. Kiran, B.; Kaushik, A.; Kaushik, C. P. Response surface methodological approach for optimizing removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution using immobilized cyanobacterium. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 126, 147-153.
30. Kumar, A.; Prasad, B.; Mshra, I. M. Optimization of process parameters for acrylonitrile removal by a low-cost adsorbent using Box- Behnken design. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 150 (1), 174-182.
31. Minitab, release 15; statistical software for windows; Minitab Inc., State College, PA, 2006.
32. Garg, U. K.; Kaur, M. P.; Garg, V. K.; Sud, D. Removal of Nickel (II) from aqueous solution by adsorption on agricultural waste biomass using a response surface methodological approach. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99 (5), 1325-1331.
33. Ravikumar, K.; Krishnan, S.; Ramalingam, S.; Balu, K. Optimization of process variables by the application of response surface methodology for dye removal using a novel adsorbent. Dyes Pigments 2007, 72, 66-74.
34. Pokhrel, D.; Viraraghvan, T. Arsenic removal from aqueous solution by iron oxide-coated fungal biomass: a factorial design analysis. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2006, 173, 195-208.
35. Ponnusami, V.; Krithika, V.; Madhuram, R.; Srivastava, S. N. Biosorption of reactive dye using acid-treated rice husk: Factorial design analysis. J. Hazard. Mater 2007, 142, 397-403.