Body tumor CT perfusion protocols: Optimization of acquisition scan parameters in a rat tumor model

Radiology

Volumn 251, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 712-720

  Tognolini, Alessia ^a   Schor Bardach, Rachel ^a,b   Pianykh, Oleg S ^a   Wilcox, Carol J ^a   Raptopoulos, Vassilios ^a   Goldberg, S Nahum ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOVERSOL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; AORTA; ARTICLE; BREAST ADENOCARCINOMA; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION ATTENUATION; RADIATION DOSE; RAT; TUMOR BLOOD FLOW;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; MAMMARY NEOPLASMS, ANIMAL; RATS; RATS, INBRED F344; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 67049137095     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2511080410     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Goh V, Padhani AR. Imaging tumor angiogenesis: functional assessment using MDCT or MRI? Abdom Imaging 2006;31:194-199.
2. Lee TY. Functional CT: physiological models. Trends Biotechnol 2002;20(suppl 8):S3-S10.
3. GE Medical Systems. User guide. Milwaukee, Wis: GE Medical Systems, 2002; 240-255.
4. Fiorella D, Heiserman J, Prenger E, Partovi S. Assessment of the reproducibility of post-processing dynamic CT perfusion data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:97-107. (Pubitemid 38129487)
5. Wintermark M, Smith WS, Ko NU, Quist M, Schnyder P, Dillon WP. Dynamic perfusion CT: optimizing the temporal resolution and contrast volume for calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:720-729. (Pubitemid 38657652)
6. Yeung WT, Lee TY, Del Maestro RF, Kozak R, Bennett JD, Brown T. An absorptiometry method for the determination of arterial blood concentration of injected iodinated contrast agent. Phys Med Biol 1992;37:1741-1758.
7. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954;6:731-744.
8. Koh TS, Wu XY, Cheong LH, Lim CC. Assessment of perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using a deconvolution approach based on regression and singular value decomposition. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23:1532-1542.
9. Miles KA. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated PET and CT. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1188-1190.
10. Tateishi U, Nishihara H, Tsukamoto E, Morikawa T, Tamaki N, Miyasaka K. Lung tumors evaluated with FDG-PET and dynamic CT: the relationship between vascular density and glucose metabolism. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:185-190. (Pubitemid 34233362)
11. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Chien D. Perfusion imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Q 1989;5:263-281.
12. Therasse P, Eisenhauer EA, Verweij J. RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:1031-1039.
13. Miles KA, Griffiths MR. Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br J Radiol 2003; 76:220-231.
14. Hakime A, Peddi H, Hines-Peralta AU, et al. CT perfusion for determination of pharmacologically mediated blood flow changes in an animal tumor model. Radiology 2007;243:712-719. (Pubitemid 46799424)
15. Mullani NA, Gould KL. First-pass measurements of regional blood flow with external detectors. J Nucl Med 1983;24:577-581.
16. Harpen MD, Lecklitner ML. Derivation of gamma variate indicator dilution function from simple convective dispersion model of blood flow. Med Phys 1984;11:690-692. (Pubitemid 15203661)
17. Koh TS, Cheong LH, Hou Z, Soh YC. A physiologic model of capillary-tissue exchange for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of tumor microcirculation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50:159-167. (Pubitemid 36330914)
18. Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Hamberg LM, et al. Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations. Radiology 2005;234:785-792. (Pubitemid 40250822)
19. Abe H, Murakami T, Kubota M, et al. Quantitative tissue blood flow evaluation of pancreatic tumor: comparison between xenon CT technique and perfusion CT technique based on deconvolution analysis. Radiat Med 2005;23:364-370. (Pubitemid 41265355)
20. Gandhi D, Chepeha DB, Miller T, et al. Correlation between initial and early follow-up CT perfusion parameters with endoscopic tumor response in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx treated with organ-preservation therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:101-106. (Pubitemid 46939894)
21. Makari Y, Yasuda T, Doki Y, et al. Correlation between tumor blood flow assessed by perfusion CT and effect of neoadjuvant therapy in advanced esophageal cancers. J Surg Oncol 2007;96:220-229. (Pubitemid 350194620)
22. Lee TY, Purdie TG, Stewart E. CT imaging of angiogenesis. Q J Nucl Med 2003;47:171-187. (Pubitemid 37279154)
23. Tsushima Y, Funabasama S, Aoki J, Sanada S, Endo K. Quantitative perfusion map of malignant liver tumors, created from dynamic computed tomography data. Acad Radiol 2004;11:215-223. (Pubitemid 38140292)
24. Li ZP, Meng QF, Sun CH, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and dynamic CT in colorectal carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:1287-1291. (Pubitemid 40425910)
25. Hirata M, Sugawara Y, Murase K, Miki H, Mochizuki T. Evaluation of optimal scan duration and end time in cerebral CT perfusion study. Radiat Med 2005;23:351-363. (Pubitemid 41265354)
26. Ng QS, Goh V, Klotz E, et al. Quantitative assessment of lung cancer perfusion using MDCT: does measurement reproducibility improve with greater tumor volume coverage? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1079-1084.