Learning voice analysis using an interactive multi-media package: Development and preliminary evaluation

Journal of Voice

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 500-512

  Oates, Jennifer ^a   Russell, Alison ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Interactive multi media; Student learning; Vocal dysfunction; Voice analysis

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; EDUCATION; ENDOSCOPY; INTERVIEW; PATHOLOGIST; REVIEW; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH THERAPY; STUDENT; VOICE;

EID: 0032429813     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80059-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Gerratt BR, Kreiman J, Antonanzas-Barroso N, Burke GS. Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgements. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:14-20.
2. Kempster GB, Kistler DJ, Hildenbrand J. Multidimensional scaling analysis of dysphonia in two speaker groups. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:534-43.
3. Gerratt BR, Till JA, Rosenbeck JC, Wertz RT, Boysen AE. Use and perceived value of perceptual and instrumental measures in dysarthria measurement. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, eds. Dysarthria and apraxia of speech: perspective on management. Baltimore: Brookes, 1991:77-93.
4. Bassich CJ, Ludlow CL. The use of perceptual methods by new clinicians for assessing voice quality. J Speech Hear Disord 1986;51:125-33.
5. Fex S. Perceptual evaluation. J Voice 1992;6:155-8.
6. Geifer MP. Perceptual attributes of a voice: development and use of rating scales. J Voice 1988;2:320-6.
7. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:21-10.
8. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Precoda K, Berke GS. Individual differences in voice quality perception. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:512-20.
9. Laver J, Hanson R. Describing the normal voice. In Darby J, ed. Evaluation of speech in psychiatry. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1981:51-78.
10. de Krom G. Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:985-1000.
11. Hammarberg B. Perceptual and acoustic analysis of dysphonia [Dissertation]. Department of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden, 1986.
12. Wilson FB, Rice M. A programmed approach to voice therapy. Austin, Tex: Learning Concepts, 1977.
13. Boone DR, McFarlane SC. The voice and voice therapy. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.
14. Wilson KD. Voice problems of children. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1987.
15. Laver J, Wirz S, Mackenzie J, Hiller S. A perceptual protocol for the analysis of vocal profiles. Work in Progress, Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh 1981; 14:139-55.
16. Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
17. Oates JM. Perceptual evaluation of voice: audiotape package. Melbourne, Australia: La Trobe University, 1992.
18. Hedberg J, Harper B. Interactive educational technologies: effective design and application in the classroom. Paper presented at: The Third International Interactive Multi-media Symposium; 1996; Perth, Australia.
19. Laurillard D. Rethinking university teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge, 1993.
20. Lebow D. Constructivist values for instructional systems design: five principles toward a new mindset. Educ Techno Res Develop 1993;41:4-16.
21. Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge, 1992.
22. Coles CR, Grant JG. Curriculum evaluation in medical and health care education. Med Educ 1985;19:405-22.
23. Marton F, Ramsden P. What does it take to improve learning? In Ramsden P, ed. Improving learning: New perspectives. London: Kogan Page, 1988.
24. Norman G. Problem-solving skills, solving problems and problem-based learning. Med Educ 1988;22:279-86.
25. Freeman M, Syder S, Nicolson R. Bridging the gap between theory and practice: a multi-media tutorial for students of voice therapy. J Voice 1996;10:292-8.
26. McNamara S, Prpic K, Fitzgerald S, Viete R, Winter R, Pallant J. Teamwork: the key to mapping creativity in multi-media development. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Melbourne, Australia, 1995:404-9.
27. McNaught C, McTigue P, Fritze P, Tregloan P, Hassett D, Whithear K, Browning G. Evaluating the impact of technology on student learning in higher education. Paper presented at: The AUC Academic Conference: Technology '95; 1995; Perth, Australia.
28. Hedberg J, Harper B, Brown C, Corderoy R. Exploring user interfaces to improve learner outcomes. In: Beattie C, McNaught C, Wills S, eds. Interactive multi-media in university education: designing for change in teaching and learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994.
29. Oliver R. Interactions in educational multi-media: the things that matter. In: McBeath C, Atkinson R, eds. The learning superhighway: new world. New worries. Proceedings of the Third International Interactive Multi-media Symposium. Perth, Australia, 1996:303-6.
30. Keller B, Keller, J. Beyond the novelty effect: designing motivating multi-media instruction. Paper presented at: The annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology; 1993; New Orleans.
31. Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, de Moor GM, Wieneke GH. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatr 1993;45:76-83.
32. Isshiki N, Okamura H, Tanabe M, Morimoto M. Differential diagnosis of hoarseness. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1969; 21:9-19.
33. McAllister A, Sederholm E, Sundberg J, Gramming P. Relations between voice range profiles and physiological and perceptual voice characteristics in ten-year-old children. J Voice 1994;8:230-9.
34. Fritzell B, Hammarberg B, Gauffin J, Karlsson I, Sundberg J. Breathiness and insufficient vocal fold closure. J Phonet 1986;14:549-53.
35. Titze IR. Principles of voice production. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.
36. McNaught C, Whithear K, Browning G. The role of evaluation in curriculum design and innovation: a case study of a computer-based approach to teaching veterinary systematic bacteriology and mycology. In: Beattie K, McNaught C, Wills S, eds. Interactive multi-media in university education: designing for change in teaching and learning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elselvier, 1994:295-307.
37. Wills S, McNaught C. Evaluation of computer-based learning in higher education. J Computing Higher Educ 1996;7: 106-28.