What happens to a unique itemsa in learners' translations? a Theoriesa and a conceptsa as a challenge for novices' views on "good translation

Benjamins Translation Library

Volumn 48, Issue , 2004, Pages 187-204

  Kujameki, Pekka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 66949158620     PISSN: 09297316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/btl.48.16kuj     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chesterman, Andrew (1993a). From 'is' to 'ought': Laws, norms and strategies in translation studies. Target, 5(1), 1-20.
2. Chesterman, Andrew (1993b). Translation as theory. Kaantäjä, 3, 1.
3. Eskola, Sari (this volume). Untypical Frequencies in Translated Language: A Corpus-Based Study on a Literary Corpus of Translated and Non-Translated Finnish. In A. Mauranen & P. Kujamäki (Eds.), Translation Universals-Do They Exist? Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
4. Fillmore, Charles J. (1977). Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistic Structures Processing (pp. 55-88). Amsterdam: N. Holland.
5. Haarala, Risto et al. (1990-1994). Suomen kielen perussanakirja [Dictionary of Contemporary Finnish]. Vol. 1-3. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus.
6. Holz-Mänttäri, Justa (1989). Interferenz als naturbedingtes Rezeptionsdefizit: Ein Beitrag aus translatologischer Sicht. In H. Schmidt (Ed.), Interferenz in der Translation (pp. 129-134). Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.
7. Hönig, Hans G. (1988). Übersetzen lernt man nicht durch Übersetzen: Ein Plädoyer für eine Propädeutik des Übersetzens. Fremdsprachen lehren und lernen, 17, 154-167.
8. Hönig, Hans G. (1995). Konstruktives Übersetzen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
9. Hurme, Raija, Malin, Riitta-Leena, & Syvaöja, Olli (1984). Uusi suomi-englanti suursanakirja/Finnish-English General Dictionary. Porvoo/Helsinki/Juva:WSOY.
10. Jaaskelaïnen, Riitta (1999). Tapping the Process: An Explorative Study of the Cognitive and Affecitve Factors Involved in Translating [University of Joensuu Publications in the Humanities 22]. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
11. Jaaskelaïnen, Riitta, & Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja (1991). Automatised processes in professional vs. non-professional translation: A think-aloud protocol study. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit (Ed.), Empirical Research on Translation and Intercultural Studies. Selected Papers of the TRANSIF Seminar, Savonlinna 1988 (pp. 89-109). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
12. Katara, Pekka, & Schellbach-Kopra, Ingrid (1997). Suomi-saksa-suursanakirja/Großwörterbuch Finnisch-Deutsch. Porvoo, Helsinki, Juva:WSOY.
13. Kujamäki, Pekka (2003). Kaappaa kaannösprosessi! Naÿtönkaappausohjelmistot aineistonkeruumenetelmänä ja kaantämisen opetuksen ja tutkimuksen työkaluna [Capture the screen! Screen recording applications as a method of data collection and as a pedagogical tool in translation class]. Paper presented at the KÄTU 2003 Translation Studies Symposium, April 4-5, 2003, Turku.
14. Kussmaul, Paul (2000a). A cognitive framework for looking at creative mental processes. In M. Olohan (Ed.), Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies I: Textual and Cognitive Aspects (pp. 57-71). Manchester, UK/Northampton, MA: St. Jerome.
15. Kussmaul, Paul (2000b). Types of creative translating. In A. Chesterman, N. Gallardo San Salvador. & Y. Gambier (Eds.), Translation in Context: Selected Contributions fromt the EST Congress, Granada 1998 (pp. 117-126). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
16. Lörscher, Wolfgang (1987). Zur Genese und Entwicklung von Übersetzungskompetenz. TextconText, 2, 193-215.
17. Mauranen, Anna (2001). Strange strings in translated language: A study on corpora. In M. Olohan (Ed.), Intercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies I: Textual and Cognitive Aspects (pp. 119-141). Manchester, UK/Northampton, MA: St. Jerome.
18. Mauranen, Anna (this volume). Corpora, Universals and Interference. In A. Mauranen & P. Kujamäki (Eds.), Translation Universals-Do They Exist? Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
19. Olohan, Maeve, & Baker, Mona (2000). Reporting that in translated English: Evidence for subconscious processes of explicitation? Across Languages and Cultures, 1(2), 141-158.
20. Schmidt, Heide (1989). Interferenz in der Translation. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.
21. Snell-Hornby, Mary (1983). Metaphorical Thought and Translation: Taking a stand on P. Newmark. Trier: L.A.U.T.
22. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja (1987). A pilot study into an aspect of the translation process. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 88, 221-229.
23. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja (2000). In search of translation universals: Non-equivalence or 'unique' items in a corpus test. Paper presented at the UMIST/UCL Research Models in Translation Studies Conference, 28-30 April 2000, Manchester.
24. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja (2002). Process research: State of the art and where to go next. Across Languages and Cultures, 3(1), 5-19.
25. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja (this volume). Unique Items-Over-or Under-Represented in Translated Language? In A. Mauranen & P. Kujamäki (Eds.), Translation Universals-Do They Exist? Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
26. Toury, Gideon (1980). In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics.
27. Toury, Gideon (1991). Experimentation in translation studies: Achievements, prospects and some pitfalls. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit (Ed.), Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies: Selected papers of the TRANSIF Seminar, Savonlinna 1998 (pp. 45-66). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
28. Toury, Gideon (1995). Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
29. Vannerem, Mia, & Snell-Hornby, Mary (1986). Die Szene hinter dem Text: 'scenesand-frames semantics'in der Übersetzung. In M. Snell-Hornby (Ed.), Übersetzungswissenschaft: Eine Neuorientierung (pp. 184-205). Tübingen: Francke.