Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids

Weed Science

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 569-574

  Lindquist, John L ^a   Mortensen, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

ABUTH; Competition; Competitive ability; Integrated weed management; Plant stress

Indexed keywords

CROP WEED COMPETITION; HYBRID; MONOCULTURE; PHYSICAL TOLERANCE; WEED CONTROL;

ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0031756046     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500091116     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berkowitz, A. R. 1988. Competition for resources in weed-crop mixtures. Pages 89-120 in M. A. Altieri and M. Liebman, eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
2. Callaway, M. B. 1990. A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. Am. J. Alternative Agric. 7:169-180.
3. Callaway, M. B. and F. Forcella. 1992. Crop tolerance to weeds. Pages 100-131 in M. B. Callaway and C. A. Francis, eds. Crop Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture Systems. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.
4. Christensen, S. 1994. Crop weed competition and herbicide performance in cereal species and varieties. Weed Res. 34:29-36.
5. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239-252.
6. Cousens, R. D. and D. J. Fletcher. 1990. Experimental design for screening competitiveness of crop cultivars. Pages 163-165 in Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conf. Adelaide, S. Australia: Crop Science Society of Australia, with assistance from the Wheat Research Council of Australia.
7. Duvick, D. N. 1992. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U.S. maize. Maydica 37:69-79.
8. Forcella, F. 1987. Tolerance of weed competition associated with high leaf area expansion rate in tall fescue. Crop Sci. 27:146-147.
9. Jennings, P. R. and R. C. Aquino. 1968. Studies on competition in rice. III. Mechanisms of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22: 529-542.
10. Jordan, N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecol. Appl. 3:84-91.
11. Kropff, M. J. and H. H. van Laar. 1993. Modelling crop-weed interactions. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International and the International Rice Research Institute. 274 p.
12. Lemerle, D., B. Verbeek, and N. E. Coombes. 1996. Interaction between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and diclofop to reduce the cost of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) control. Weed Sci. 44:634-639.
13. Levitt, J. 1980. Response of plants to environmental stresses. 2nd ed, Volume 2. New York: Academic Press. 607 p.
14. Lindquist, J. L. 1997. An Ecophysiological Approach to Understanding Corn Tolerance and Velvetleaf Suppressive Ability. Ph.D. thesis. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. 156 p.
15. Lindquist, J. L. and M. J. Kropff. 1996. Applications of an ecophysiological model for irrigated rice (Oryza sativa)-Echinochloa competition. Weed Sci. 44:52-56.
16. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, S. A. Clay, R. Schmenk, J. J. Kells, K. Howatt, and P. Westra. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 44:309-313.
17. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, and B. E. Johnson. 1998. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron. J. In press.
18. Lotz, L.A.P., S. Christensen, D. Cloutier, et al. 1996. Prediction of the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields based on the relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Res. 36:93-101.
19. McLachlan, S. M., M. Tollenaar, C. J. Swanton, and S. E Weise. 1993. Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 41:568-573.
20. Murphy, S. D., Y. Yakubu, S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1996. Effect of planting patterns and inter-row cultivation on competition between corn (Zea mays) and late emerging weeds. Weed Sci. 44:856-870.
21. Ottman, M. J. and L. E Welch. 1989. Planting patterns and radiation interception, plant nutrient concentration, and yield in corn. Agron. J. 81:167-174.
22. Ratkowsky, D. A. 1983. Nonlinear regression modeling: a unified practical approach. New York: Marcel Dekker. 276 p.
23. Salonen, J. 1992. Efficacy of reduced herbicide doses in spring cereals of different competitive ability. Weed Res. 32:483-491.
24. Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Responses of corn hybrids to yellow foxtail competition. Weeds 9:132-136.
25. Swinton, S. M., D. D. Buhler, F. Forcella, J. L. Gunsolus, and R. P. King. 1994. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Sci. 42:103-109.
26. Tetio-Kagho, F. and F. P. Gardner. 1988. Responses of maize to plant population density. I. Canopy development, light relationships, and vegetative growth. Agron. J. 80:930-935.
27. Tollenaar, M., A. A. Dibo, A. Aguilera, S. F. Wiese, and C. J. Swanton. 1994a. Effect of crop density on weed interference in maize. Agron. J. 86:591-595.
28. Tollenaar, M., S. P. Nissanka, A. Aguilera, S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1994b. Effect of weed interference and soil nitrogen on four maize hybrids. Agron. J. 86:596-601.
29. Tollenaar, M., A. Aguilera, and S. P. Nissanka. 1997. Grain yield is reduced more by weed interference in an old than in a new maize hybrid. Agron. J. 89:239-246.
30. Wicks, G. A., R. E. Ramsel, P. T. Nordquist, J. W. Schmidt, and Challaiah. 1986. Impact of wheat cultivars on establishment and suppression of summer annual weeds. Agron. J. 78:59-62.
31. Williams, W. A., R. S. Loomis, W. G. Duncan, A. Dovrat, and F. Nunez A. 1968. Canopy architecture at various population densities and the growth and grain yield of corn. Crop Sci. 8:303-308.