A new species of Sphaerophorus, and a key to the family sphaerophoraceae in western North America

Bryologist

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 368-374

  Wedin, Mats ^a   Högnabba, Fllip ^b   Goward, Trevor ^c,d  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Mexico; New species; Nomenclature; Sphaerophoraceae; Sphaerophorus; Systematics; Taxonomy; United states

Indexed keywords

ASCOMYCOTA; LECANORALES; SPHAEROPHORACEAE; SPHAEROPHORUS;

EID: 66949134716     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745-112.2.368     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arup, U., S. Ekman, L. Lindblom & J.-E. Mattsson. 1993. High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC), an improved technique for screening lichen substances. Lichenologist 25: 61-71.
2. Döring, H. & M. Wedin. 2000. Homology assessment of the boundary tissue in fruiting bodies of the lichen family Sphaerophoraceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota). Plant Biology 2: 361-367.
3. Geiser, L. H., K. L. Dillman, C. C. Derr & M. C. Stensvold. 1994. Lichens of southeastern Alaska: an inventory. USDA Forest Service, Alaska Region R10-TB-45: 1-245, Petersburg, AK.
4. Gowan, S. P. 8c I. M. Brodo. 1988. The lichens of Fundy National Park, New Brunswick, Canada. The Bryologist 91: 255-325.
5. Goward, T. 1999. The Lichens of British Columbia. Part 2. Fruticose Species. B.C. Ministry of Forests Research Program, Victoria.
6. -& A. Arsenault. 2001. Cyanolichen distribution in young unmanaged forests: A dripzone effect? The Bryologist 103: 28-37.
7. -& T. Spribille. 2005. Lichenological evidence for the recognition of inland rain forests in western North America. Journal of Biogeography 32: 1209-1219.
8. Grube, M. & S. Kroken. 2000. Molecular approaches and the concept of species and species complexes in lichenized fungi. Mycological Research 104: 1284-1294.
9. Högnabba, F. & M. Wedin. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of the Sphaerophorus globosus species complex. Cladistics 19: 224-232.
10. Krog, H. 1968. The macrolichens of Alaska. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 144: 1-180.
11. Lamb, I. M. 1954. Lichens of Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 132: 239-313.
12. McCune, B. & L. Geiser. 1997. Macrolichens of the Pacific Northwest. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
13. Muller, J. 1883. Lichenologische Beitrage XVIII. Flora 66: 344-354.
14. Rasanen, V. J. P. B. 1933. Contribution to the lichen flora of North America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 20: 7-21.
15. Taylor, J. W., D. J. Jacobson, S. Kroken, T. Kasuga, D. M. Geiser, D. S. Hibbett & M. C. Fisher. 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 31: 21-32.
16. Tibell, L. 1981. Formation of spore ornamentation in two Sphaerophorus species. Nordic Journal of Botany 1: 333-340.
17. Wedin, M. 1993. A phylogenetic analysis of Sphaerophoraceae (Caliciales): a new generic classification and notes on character evolution. Plant Systematics and Evolution 187: 213-241.
18. -. 1995. The lichen family Sphaerophoraceae (Caliciales, Ascomycotina) in temperate areas of the Southern
19. Hemisphere. Symbolae Botanicae Upsaliensis 31: 1-102.
20. --8c H. Doring. 1999. The phylogenetic relationship between the Sphaerophoraceae, Neophyllis and Austropeltum (lichenized Ascomycota). Mycological Research 103: 1131-1137.
21. --,-8c S. Ekman. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the lichen families Cladoniaceae, Sphaerophoraceae, and Stereocaulaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycotina). Lichenologist 32: 171-187.