Erratum: Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: A randomized double-blind trial (The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2009) 104 (1119-1124) DOI:10.1038/ajg.2009.53);Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: A randomized double-blind trial

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1119-1124

  Fanti, Lorella ^a,b   Massimo, Agostoni ^a   Marco, Gemma ^a   Giulia, Gambino ^a   Antonio, Facciorusso ^a   Mario, Guslandi ^a   Giorgio, Torri ^a   Alberto, Testoni Pier ^a  

^a SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; PETHIDINE; REMIFENTANIL; PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; PREMEDICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VITAL SIGN; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DOSE RESPONSE; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFERENCE VALUE; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; MEPERIDINE; MIDAZOLAM; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PIPERIDINES; PREMEDICATION; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 66949131084     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.266     Document Type: Erratum

References (22)

1. Keeffe EB, O'Connor KW. 1989 A/S/G/E survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices. Gastrointest Endosc 1990;36:13-8.
2. Jamieson J. Anesthesia and sedation in the endoscopy suite? (Influences and options). Curr Opin Anesthesiol 1999;12:417-23.
3. Reimann FM, Samson U, Derad I et al. Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2000;32:239-44.
4. Lazzaroni M, Bianchi PG. Preparation, premedication and surveillance. Endoscopy 1996;28:6-12.
5. Heiman DR, Tolliver BA, Weis FR et al. Patient-controlled anesthesia for colonoscopy using propofol: results of a pilot study. South Med J 1998;91:560-4.
6. Rosow C. Remifentanil: a unique opioids analgesic. Anesthesiology 1993;78:875-6.
7. Stermer E, Gaitini L, Yudashkin M et al. Patient-controlled analgesia for conscious sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:278-81.
8. Roseveare C, Seavell C, Patel P et al. Patient-controlled sedation and analgesia, using propofol and alfentanil, during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 1998;30:768-73.
9. Lee DWH, Chan ACW, Sze TS et al. Patient-controlled sedation vs. intravenous sedation for colonoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:629-32.
10. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: Study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990;10:244-51.
11. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970;49:924-34.
12. Aldrete JA. The post anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:89-91.
13. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J et al. Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:606-10.
14. Thurlow JA, Laxton CH, Dick A et al. Remifentanil by patient-controlled analgesia compared with intramuscular meperidine for pain relief in labour. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:374-8.
15. Jones R, Pegrum A, Stacey RGW. Patient-controlled analgesia using remifentanil in the parturient with thrombocytopenia. Anaesthesia 1999;54:461-5.
16. Greilich PE, Virella CD, Rich JM et al. Remifentanil vs. meperidine for monitored anesthesia care: a comparison study in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. Anesth Analg 2001;92:80-4.
17. Akcaboy ZN, Akcaboy EY, Albayrak D et al. Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006;50:736-41.
18. Moerman AT, Foubert LA, Herregods LL et al. Propofol vs. remifentanil for monitored anaesthesia care during colonoscopy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:461-6.
19. Manolaraki MM, Theodoropoulou A, Stroumpos C et al. Remifentanil compared with midazolam and pethidine sedation during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized study. Dig Dis Sci 2008;53:34-40.
20. Bouvet L, Allauchiche B, Duflo F et al. Remifentanil is an effective alternative to Propofol for patient-controlled analgesia during digestive endoscopic procedure. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:122-5.
21. Blair JM, Hill DA, Fee JP. Patient-controlled analgesia for labour using remifentanil: a feasibility study. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:415-20.
22. Bouvet L, Chassard D, Boselli E. Can continous infusion be a better choice than patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy during monitored anaesthesia care? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:382-3.