Evolution of predator and prey movement into sink habitats

American Naturalist

Volumn 174, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 68-81

  Schreiber, Sebastian J ^a   Saltzman, Evan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Dispersal evolution; Predator prey interactions; Source sink dynamics

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; GROWTH RATE; MORTALITY; MOVEMENT; NATURAL SELECTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHENOTYPE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS; TROPHIC LEVEL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FOOD CHAIN; POPULATION MIGRATION;

ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 66849135389     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/599296     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1986. Adaptive responses of predators to prey and prey to predators: the failure of the arms-race analogy. Evolution 40:1229-1247.
2. Amezcua, A. B., and M. Holyoak. 2000. Empirical evidence for predator-prey source-sink dynamics. Ecology 81:3087-3098.
3. Beers, C. D. 1925. Encystment and the life cycle in the ciliate Didinium nasutum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 11:523-528.
4. Chesson, P. L. 1978. Predator-prey theory and variability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9:323-347.
5. Cohen, D., and S. A. Levin. 1991. Dispersal in patchy environments: the effects of temporal and spatial structure. Theoretical Population Biology 39:63-99.
6. Delibes, M., P. Gaona, and P. Ferreras. 2001. Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. American Naturalist 158:277-285. (Pubitemid 32792197)
7. Dias, P. C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:326-330.
8. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
9. Dockery, J., V. Hutson, K. Mischaikow, and M. Pernarowski. 1998. The evolution of slow dispersal rates: a reaction diffusion model. Journal of Mathematical Biology 37:61-83. (Pubitemid 128736977)
10. Doebeli, M., and G. D. Ruxton. 1997. Evolution of dispersal rates in metapopulation models: branching and cyclic dynamics in phenotype space. Evolution 51:1730-1741. (Pubitemid 28104534)
11. Elton, C., and M. Nicholson. 1942. The ten-year cycle in numbers of the lynx in Canada. Journal of Animal Ecology 11:215-244.
12. Fretwell, S. D., and H. L. Lucas Jr. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica 19:16-36.
13. Fussmann, G. F., S. P. Ellner, K. W. Shertzer, and N. G. Hairston Jr. 2000. Crossing the Hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. Science 290:1358-1360. (Pubitemid 30848330)
14. Geritz, S. A. H., J. A. J. Metz, E. Kisdi, and G. Meszéna. 1997. Dynamics of adaptation and evolutionary branching. Physical Review Letters 78:2024-2027.
15. Hanski, I., P. Turchin, E. Korpimäk, and H. Henttonen. 1993. Population oscillations of boreal rodents: regulation by mustelid predators leads to chaos. Nature 364:232-235. (Pubitemid 23257079)
16. Harrison, M. A., Y C. Lai, and R. D. Holt. 2001. Dynamical mechanism for coexistence of dispersing species. Journal of Theoretical Biology 213:53-72.
17. Hastings, A. 1983. Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal? Theoretical Population Biology 24:244-251.
18. Hastings, A., and T. Powell. 1991. Chaos in a three-species food chain. Ecology 72:896-903.
19. Hoffmann, A. A., and M. W. Blows. 1994. Species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9: 223-227. (Pubitemid 2084773)
20. Holt, R. D. 1985. Patch dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theoretical Population Biology 28:181-208.
21. - 1993. Ecology at the mesoscale: the influence of regional processes on local communities. Pages 77-88 in R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schlüter, eds. Species diversity in ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. - 1997. On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evolutionary Ecology 11:723-731.
23. Holt, R. D., and R. Gomulkiewicz. 1997. How does immigration influence local adaptation? a reexamination of a familiar paradigm. American Naturalist 149:563-572. (Pubitemid 27237907)
24. Holt, R. D., and M.. A. McPeek. 1996. Chaotic population dynamics favors the evolution of dispersal. American Naturalist 148:709718.
25. Holt, R. D., M. Barfield, and A. Gonzalez. 2003a. Impacts of environmental variability in open populations and communities: "inflation" in sink environments. Theoretical Population Biology 64: 315-330.
26. Holt, R. D., R. Gomulkiewicz, and M. Barfield. 2003b. The phenomenology of niche evolution via quantitative traits in a "black-hole" sink. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 215-224.
27. Huffaker, C B. 1958. Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343-383.
28. Jansen, V. A. A., and J. Yoshimura. 1998. Populations can persist in an environment consisting of sink habitats only. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95:3696-3698.
29. Keagy, J., S. J. Schreiber, and D. A. Cristol. 2005. Replacing sources with sinks: when do populations go down the drain? Restoration Ecology 13:529-535.
30. Kimura, M. 1965. A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 54:731-736.
31. Kirkland, S., C K. Li, and S. J. Schreiber. 2006. On the evolution of dispersal in patchy landscapes. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 66:1366-1382.
32. Kisdi, E. 2002. Dispersal: risk spreading versus local adaptation. American Naturalist 159:579-596. (Pubitemid 34598377)
33. Kisdi, E., and S. A. H. Geritz. 1999. Adaptive dynamics in allele space: evolution of genetic polymorphism by small mutations in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 53:993-1008. (Pubitemid 29416943)
34. Luckinbill, L. S. 1973. Coexistence in laboratory populations of Paramecium aurelia and its predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology 54: 1320-1327.
35. Mathias, A., E. Kisdi, and I. Olivieri. 2001. Divergent evolution of dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Evolution 55:246-259. (Pubitemid 32228611)
36. McPeek, M. A., and R. D. Holt. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. American Naturalist 140:1010-1027.
37. Metz, J. A. J., S. A. H. Geritz, G. Meszéna, F. J. A. Jacobs, and J. S. van Heerwaarden. 1996. Adaptive dynamics: a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. Pages 183-231 in S. J. van Strien and S. M. Verduyn-Lunel, eds. Stochastic and spatial structures of dynamical systems and their applications. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam.
38. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652-661.
39. - 1996. Sources and sinks: empirical evidence and population consequences. Pages 45-69 in O. E. Rhodes Jr., R. K. Chesser, and M.. H. Smith, eds. Population dynamics in ecological space and time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
40. Remeš, V. 2000. How can maladaptive habitat choice generate sourcesink population dynamics? Oikos 91:579-582.
41. Robb, T., and M. V. Abrahams. 2002. The influence of hypoxia on risk of predation and habitat choice by the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52:2530. (Pubitemid 36059099)
42. Rosenzweig, M.. L. 1971. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171:385-387.
43. Schmidt, K. A., J. M. Earnhardt, J. S. Brown, and R. D. Holt. 2000. Habitat selection under temporal heterogeneity: exorcizing the ghost of competition past. Ecology 81:2622-2630.
44. Schreiber, S. J., and M. Kelton. 2005. Sink habitats can alter ecological outcomes for competing species. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 995-1004.
45. Schreiber, S. J., R. Lipcius, R. Seitz, and C. Long. 2006. Dancing between the devil and the deep blue sea: the stabilizing effect of enemy-free sinks and victimless sinks. Oikos 113:67-81.
46. van Baalen, M., and M. W. Sabelis. 1999. Nonequilibrium population dynamics of ideal and free prey and predators. American Naturalist 154:69-88.
47. Vierling, K. T. 2000. Source and sink habitats of red-winged blackbirds in a rural/suburban landscape. Ecological Applications 10: 1211-1218.
48. Watkinson, A. R., and W. J. Sutherland. 1995. Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. Journal of Animal Ecology 64:126-130.
49. Ylönen, H., R. Pech, and S. Davis. 2003. Heterogeneous landscapes and the role of refuge on the population dynamics of a specialist predator and its prey. Evolutionary Ecology 17:349-369. (Pubitemid 37488956)