It takes two to tango: Reproductive skew and social correlates of male mating success in a lek-breeding bird

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 276, Issue 1666, 2009, Pages 2377-2384

  Ryder, Thomas B ^a,b,c   Parker, Patricia G ^a,b   Blake, John G ^a,b   Loiselle, Bette A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coordinated display; Manakins; Pipra filicauda; Reproductive skew; Social networks

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATION; DISPLAY BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; LEK; MATE ATTRACTION; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PASSERINE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ARTICLE; BIRD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MATING SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIOMETRIC STATUS;

AVES; PIPRA FILICAUDA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 66749169455     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0208     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Albert, R. & Barabasi, A. L. 2004 Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47-85. (doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47)
2. Balmford, A. 1991 Mate choice on leks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 87-91. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91))
3. Blake, J. G. & Loiselle, B. A. 2008 Estimates of apparent survival rates for forest birds in eastern Ecuador. Biotropica 40, 485-493. (doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00395.x)
4. Borgatti, S. P. 2002 NETDRAW: graph visualization software. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
5. Borgatti, S. P., Everet, M. G. & Freeman, L. C. 2002 UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
6. Bradbury, J. W., Vehrencamp, S. L. & Gibson, R. 1985 Leks and the unanimity of female choice. In Evolution: essays in honor of John Maynard Smith (eds P. J. Greenwood, P. H. Harvey & M. Slatkin), pp. 301-314. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cant, M. A. & Johnstone, R. A. 1999 Costly young and reproductive skew in animal societies. Behav. Ecol. 10, 178-184. (doi:10.1093/beheco/10.2. 178)
8. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. S. & Price, B. 2000 Regression analysis by example. New York, NY: Wiley.
9. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1998 Reproductive skew, concessions and limited control. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 288-292. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01402-5)
10. Croft, D. P., Krause, J. & James, R. 2004 Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, S516-S519. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0206)
11. Double, M. C., Cockburn, S. C., Barry, S. C. & Smouse, P. E. 1997 Exclusion probabilities for single-locus paternity analysis when related males compete for matings. Mol. Ecol. 6, 1155-1166. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997. 00291.x)
12. Durães, R., Loiselle, B. A., Parker, P. G. & Blake, J. G. 2009 Female mate choice across spatial scales: influence of lek and male attributes on mating success of blue-crowned manakins. Proc. R. Soc. B. 276, 1875-1881. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1752)
13. DuVal, E. H. 2007 Adaptive advantages of cooperative courtship for subordinate male lance-tailed manakins. Am. Nat. 169, 423-432. (doi:10.1086/512137)
14. DuVal, E. H. & Nutt, K. J. 2005 Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the lancetailed manakin (Chiroxiphia lanceolata). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2, 112-114. (doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00856.x)
15. Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. 1977 Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215-223. (doi:10.1126/science.327542)
16. Foster, M. S. 1981 Cooperative display and social organization of the swallow-tailed manakin (Chiroxiphia caudata). Behav. Ecol. 13, 167-177.
17. Goudet, J. 2002 FSTAT, v. 2.9.3.2. Lausanne, Switzerland: University of Lausanne.
18. Graham, M. H. 2003 Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84, 2809-2815. (doi:10.1890/02-3114)
19. Griffin, A. S., Pemberton, J. M., Brotherton, P. N. M., McIlrath, G., Gaynor, D., Kansky, R., O'Riain, J. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. 2003 A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Behav. Ecol. 14, 472-480. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arg040) (Pubitemid 37042016)
20. Griffiths, R., Double, M. C., Orr, K. & Dawson, J. G. 1998 A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Ecol. 7, 1071-1075. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998. 00389.x)
21. Haydock, J. & Koenig, W. D. 2003 Patterns of reproductive skew in the polygynandrous acorn woodpecker. Am. Nat. 162, 277-289. (doi:10.1086/376888)
22. Heindl, M. 2002 Social organization on leks of the wire-tailed manakin in southern Venezuela. Condor 104, 772-779. (doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2002)104[0772: SOOLOT]2.0.CO;2) (Pubitemid 41294979)
23. Höglund, J. & Alatalo, R. V. 1995 Leks. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Kalinowski, S. T., Taper, M. L. & Marshall, T. C. 2007 Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16, 1099-1106. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007. 03089.x)
25. Keller, L. & Reeve, H. K. 1994 Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 98-102. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90204-6)
26. Kokko, H. & Johnstone, R. A. 1999 Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 571-578. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0674)
27. Krause, J., Croft, D. P. & James, R. 2007 Social network theory in the behavioral sciences: potential applications. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 15-27. (doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0445-8)
28. Lanctot, R. B., Scribner, K. T., Kempenaers, B. & Weatherhead, P. 1997 Lekking without a paradox in the buff-breasted sandpiper. Am. Nat. 149, 1051-1070. (doi:10.1086/286038)
29. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 1998 Numerical ecology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
30. Lill, A. 1974 Social organization and space utilization in the lek forming white-bearded manakin Manacus manacus trinitatis. Z. Tierpsychol. 36, 513-530.
31. Lill, A. 1976 Lek behavior in the golden-headed manakin, Pipra erythrocephala in Trinidad (West Indies). Berlin, Germany: Verlag Paul Parey.
32. Loiselle, B. A., Blake, J. G., Durães, R., Ryder, T. B. & Tori, W. P. 2007a Environmental and spatial segregation of leks among six co-occuring species of manakins (Aves: Pipridae) in eastern Ecuador. Auk 124, 420-431. (doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2007)124[420:EASSOL]2.0.CO;2) (Pubitemid 46799124)
33. Loiselle, B. A., Ryder, T. B., Duraes, R., Tori, W. P., Blake, J. G. & Parker, P. G. 2007b Kin selection does not explain male aggregation at leks of 4 manakin species. Behav. Ecol. 18, 287-291. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arl081)
34. Longmire, J. L. et al. 1988 Isolation and characterization of a highly polymorphic centromeric tandem repeat in the family Falconidae. Genomics 2, 14-24. (doi:10.1016/0888-7543(88)90104-8)
35. Mackenzie, A., Reynolds, J. D., Brown, V. J. & Sutherland, W. J. 1995 Variation in male mating success on leks. Am. Nat. 145, 633-652. (doi:10.1086/285759)
36. Magrath, R. D. & Heinsohn, R. G. 2000 Reproductive skew in birds: models, problems and prospects. J. Avian Biol. 31, 247-258. (doi:10.1034/j.1600- 048X.2000.310217.x)
37. Marshall, T., Slate, J., Kruuk, L. E. B. & Pemberton, J. M. 1998 Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7, 639-655. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x)
38. McDonald, D. B. 1989 Correlates of male mating success in a leking bird with male-male cooperation. Anim. Behav. 37, 1007-1022. (doi:10.1016/0003- 3472(89)90145-0)
39. McDonald, D. B. 2007 Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10 910-10 914. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0701159104)
40. McDonald, D. B. & Potts, W. K. 1994 Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek mating bird. Science 266, 1030-1032. (doi:10.1126/science.7973654)
41. Newman, M. E. J. 2003 The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167-256. (doi:10.1137/S003614450342480)
42. Nonacs, P. 2000 Measuring and using skew in the study of social behavior and evolution. Am. Nat. 156, 577-589. (doi:10.1086/316995)
43. Nonacs, P. 2003 Measuring the reliability of skew indices: is there one best index? Anim. Behav. 65, 615-627. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2096) (Pubitemid 36524216)
44. Petrie, M., Hall, M., Halliday, T., Budgey, H. & Pierpoint, C. 1992 Multiple mating in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31, 349-358. (doi:10.1007/BF00177775)
45. Piertney, S. B., Shorey, L. & Höglund, J. 2002 Characterization of microsatellite DNA markers in the white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2, 504-505. (doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00292.x) (Pubitemid 35436730)
46. Prodohl, P. A., Loughry, W. J., McDonough, C. M., Nelson, W. S., Thompson, E. A. & Avise, J. C. 1998 Genetic maternity and paternity in a local population of armadillos assessed by microsatellite DNA markers and field data. Am. Nat. 151, 7-19. (doi:10.1086/286098)
47. Rappole, J. H. & Tipton, A. R. 1991 New harness design for attachment of radio transmitters to small passerines. J. Field Ornithol. 62, 335-337.
48. Reeve, H. K., Emlen, S. T. & Keller, L. 1998 Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders? Behav. Ecol. 9, 267-278. (doi:10.1093/beheco/9.3.267) (Pubitemid 28278731)
49. Ryder, T. B. 2008 Reproductive and social dynamics of a lekbreeding bird. PhD dissertation, University of Missouri-St Louis, St Louis, MO, DAI-B 69/08 (UMI No. 3323332).
50. Ryder, T. B. & Durães, R. 2005 It's not easy being green: using molt limits to age and sex green plumage manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Ornitol. Neotrop. 16, 481-491.
51. Ryder, T. B., McDonald, D. B., Blake, J. G., Parker, P. G. & Loiselle, B. A. 2008 Social networks in the lek-mating wire-tailed manakin. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1367-1374. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0205)
52. Stephenson, K. A. & Zelen, M. 1989 Rethinking centrality: methods and examples. Soc. Netw. 11, 1-37. (doi:10.1016/0378-8733(89)90016-6)
53. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. 1994 Social network analysis: methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54. Webster, M. S., Tarvin, K. A., Tuttle, E. M. & Pruett-Jones, S. 2004 Reproductive promiscuity in the splendid fairy-wren: effects of group size and auxillary reproduction. Behav. Ecol. 15, 907-915. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arh093)
55. Wey, T., Blumstein, D. T., Shen, W. & Jordan, F. 2008 Social network analysis of animal behavior: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim. Behav. 75, 333-344. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.020)
56. Wiley, R. H. 1991 Lekking in birds and mammals: behavioral and evolutionary issues. Adv. Study Behav. 20, 201-291. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(08) 60322-8)