Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue 978, 2009, Pages 475-481

  Punwani, S ^a   Halligan, Steve ^a,c   Tolan, D ^b   Taylor, S A ^a   Hawkes, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASCENDING COLON; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON MOTILITY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DESCENDING COLON; DEVICE; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECTUM; SIGMOID; SUPERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY; SUPINE POSITION; TRANSVERSE COLON;

COLON; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PRONE POSITION; SEX FACTORS; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 66749134795     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/91937173     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, metaanalysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005;237:893-904. (Pubitemid 41636379)
2. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, Taylor SA, Burling D, Roddie M, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1690-1699 (Pubitemid 44958520)
3. Yoshida H, Masutani Y, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology 2002;222:327-336 (Pubitemid 34106100)
4. Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM, Malley JD, Youssef AM, Reed JE. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 2001;219:51-59 (Pubitemid 32234051)
5. Halligan S, Taylor SA, Dehmeshki J, Amin H, Ye X, Tsang J, et al. Computer-assisted detection for CT colonography: external validation. Clin Radiol 2006;61:758-63, discussion 764-765 (Pubitemid 44184731)
6. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, Franaszek M, Bitter I, Brickman D, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005;129:1832-1844 (Pubitemid 41772962)
7. Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Kumar PR, Wall SD. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 2003;226:653-661 (Pubitemid 36259138)
8. de Vries AH, Truyen R, van der Peijl J, Florie J, van Gelder RE, Gerritsen F, et al. Feasibility of automated matching of supine and prone CT-colonography examinations. Br J Radiol 2006;79:740-744 (Pubitemid 44349517)
9. Hawkes DJ. Algorithms for radiological image registration and their clinical application. J Anat 1998;193:347-361 (Pubitemid 28534891)
10. Saunders BP, Halligan S, Jobling C, Fukumoto M, Moussa ME, Williams CB, et al. Can barium enema indicate when colonoscopy will be difficult? Clin Radiol 1995;50:318-321
11. Sadahiro S, Ohmura T, Yamada Y, Saito T, Taki Y. Analysis of length and surface area of each segment of the large intestine according to age, sex and physique. Surg Radiol Anat 1992;14:251-257
12. Saunders BP, Phillips RK, Williams CB. Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy. Br J Surg 1995;82:1491-1493
13. Underhill BM. Intestinal length in man. Br Med J 1955;2:1243-1246
14. Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:774-779 (Pubitemid 47479756)