A template-based approach for the analysis of lung nodules in a volumetric CT phantom study

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 7260, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Gavrielides, Marios A ^a   Zeng, Rongping ^a   Kinnard, Lisa M ^a   Myers, Kyle J ^a   Petrick, Nicholas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

3D template matching; CAD development; General methodology; Lung cancer; Lung nodules; Measurement error; Phantom studies; Volumetric CT

Indexed keywords

3D TEMPLATE MATCHING; CAD DEVELOPMENT; GENERAL METHODOLOGY; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULES; PHANTOM STUDIES; VOLUMETRIC CT;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ESTIMATION; MEDICAL IMAGING; POTENTIAL FLOW; TEMPLATE MATCHING; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VOLUME MEASUREMENT;

MEASUREMENTS;

EID: 66749116108     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.813560     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Gavrielides MA, Kinnard LM, Myers KJ, Petrick N. Non-calcified lung nodules: Volumetric assessment with thoracic CT. Radiology 2009; 251:1-11.
2. Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L, et al. Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25:417-434.
3. Meyer CR, Johnson TD, McLennan G, et al. Evaluation of lung MDCT nodule annotation across radiologists and methods. Academic Radiology 2006; 13:1254-1265. (Pubitemid 44345260)
4. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 2006; 187:1483-1491. (Pubitemid 44788678)
5. Kuhnigk J-M, Dicken V, Zidowitz S, et al. Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT. Part 1. Functional analysis of lungs, lung lobes, and bronchopulmonary segments. Radiographics 2005; 25:525-536. (Pubitemid 40547069)
6. Kostis WJ, Reeves AP, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Three-dimensional segmentation and growth-rate estimation of small pulmonary nodules in helical CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22:1259-1274.
7. Reeves AP, Chan AB, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI, Kressler B, Kostis WJ. On measuring the change in size of pulmonary nodules. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25:435-450.
8. Zhao B, Reeves AP, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Three-dimensional multicriterion automatic segmentation of pulmonary nodules of helical computed tomography images. Opt. Eng. 1999; 38:1340-1347.
9. Zhao B, Kostis W, Reeves A, Yankelevitz D, Henschke C. Consistent segmentation of repeat CT scans for growth assesment in pulmonary nodules. In:SPIE Conference on Image Processing. San Diego, California, 1999; 1012-1018.
10. Wiemker R, Rogala P, Hein E, Blaffert T, Rosch P. Computer aided segmentation of pulmonary nodules: automated vasculature cutoff in thick- and thin-slice CT. In:Proceedings of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, CARS 2003. Amsterdam, The Nederlands: Elsevier, 2003; 965-970.
11. Wiemker R, Rogalla P, Blaffert T, et al. Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT. Br J Radiol 2005; 78 Spec No 1:S46- 56. (Pubitemid 40932507)
12. Okada K, Comaniciu D, Krishnan A. Robust anisotropic gaussian fitting for volumetric characterization of pulmonary nodules in multislice CT. IEEE Transactions on MedicalImaging 2005; 24:409-423. (Pubitemid 40329799)
13. Das M, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Gietema HA, et al. Accuracy of automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules across different multislice CT scanners. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:1979-1984. (Pubitemid 47097455)
14. Kinnard LM, Gavrielides MA, Myers KJ, et al. Volume Error Analysis for Lung Nodules Attached to Bronchial Vessels in an Anthropomorphic Thoracic Phantom. In:Proceedings of the SPIE, Medical Imaging 2008. San Diego, CA, 2008.
15. Goodsitt MM, Chan H-P, Way TW, Larson SC, Christodoulou EG, Kim J. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners. Medical Physics 2006; 33:3006-3017. (Pubitemid 44154573)
16. Birnbaum BA, Hindman N, Lee J, Babb JS. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 2007; 242:109-119. (Pubitemid 44956015)
17. Kostis WJ, Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Fluture SC, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. Radiology 2004; 231:446-452. (Pubitemid 38552903)
18. Goodman LR, Gulsun M, Washington L, Nagy PG, Piacsek KL. Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 2006; 186:989-994. (Pubitemid 46100197)
19. Bogot NR, Kazerooni EA, Kelly AM, Quint LE, Desjardins B, Nan B. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods. Acad Radiol 2005; 12:948-956. (Pubitemid 41116411)
20. Revel MP, Lefort C, Bissery A, et al. Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with threedimensional evaluation. Radiology 2004; 231:459-466. (Pubitemid 38552905)
21. Juluru K, Kim W., Boonn W., King T., Siddiqui K., Siegel E. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules: variability in automated analysis tools. In: S.C. Horii KPA, ed. SPIE Medical Imaging 2007: PACS and Imaging Informatics. San Diego, CA, 2007. (Pubitemid 47550661)
22. Ko JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs EL, et al. Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT-phantom study. Radiology 2003; 228:864-870. (Pubitemid 37025500)
23. Hsieh J. Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts and Recent Advances. In: SPIE Press, 2003.
24. Hu H. Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Medical Physics 1999. (Pubitemid 29054981)