A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1392-1406

  Pera, Maria Soledad ^a   Lund, William ^b   Ng, Yiu Kai ^a  

^a 3361 TMCB   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOLKSONOMIES; FOLKSONOMY; INITIAL INFORMATION; LIBRARY CATALOGS; LIBRARY SEARCH; LIBRARY SYSTEMS; SEARCHING STRATEGY; SIMILARITY-MATCHING; WEB SEARCH ENGINES;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LIBRARIES; SEARCH ENGINES;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 66749084380     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21072     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Antelman, K., Lynema, E., & Pace, A. (2006). Toward a 21st century library catalog. Information. Technology and Libraries, 25(3), 128-139.
2. Aslam, J., Pavlu, V., & Yilmaz, E. (2006). A statistical method for system, evaluation using incomplete judgments. In Proceedings of the 29th annual International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (pp. 541-548). (Pubitemid 44626659)
3. Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern information retrieval. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
4. Borgman, C. (1996). Why are online catalogs still, hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 493-503.
5. Clements, M., de Vries, A., & Reinders, M. (2008). Detecting synonyms in social tagging systems to improve content retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (pp. 739-740).
6. Cooper, M., & Chen, H. (2001). Predicting the relevance of a library catalog search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(10), 813-827.
7. Crecelius, T., Kacimi, M., Michel, T., Neumann, T., Parreira, J., Schenkel, R., & Weikum, G. (2008). Making SENSE: Socially enhanced search and exploration. In Proceedings of Very Large Data Bases (VLDB) (pp. 1480-1483).
8. De Rosa, C., Cantrell, J., Cellentani, D., Hawk, J., Jenkins, L., & Wilson, A. (2005). Perceptions of libraries and information resources. Online Computer Library Center (OCLC). Retrieved March 17, 2009, from, http:// www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.html
9. Dubois, P. (2005). MySQL (3rd ed.). Developer's Library Series.: Sams. Retrieved March 17, 2009, from http://www.informit.com/imprint/index aspx?st=61091
10. Farajpahlou, A. (1999). Defining some criteria for the success of automated library systems. Library Review, 48(4), 169-180.
11. Goncalves, M., Fox, E., Krowne, A., Calado, P., Laender, A., da Silva, A., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (2004). The effectiveness of automatically structured queries in digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 98-107).
12. Gustafson, N., Pera, M.S., & Ng, Y.-K. (2008). Nowhere to hide: Finding plagiarized documents based on sentence similarity. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (pp. 690-696).
13. Herrera, G. (2007). MetaSearching and beyond: Implementation, experiences and advice from an academic library. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(2), 44-52.
14. Hoscher, C., & Strube, G. (2000). Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, 33, 337-346.
15. Inouye, A. (2001). A digital strategy for the Library of Congress. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 43.
16. Ismail, L. (2008). LibraryThing for libraries. The Charleston Advisor, 10(2), 23-26.
17. Koberstein, J., & Ng, Y.-K. (2006). Using word clusters to detect similar Web documents. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM '06), LNAI 4092 (pp. 215-228).
18. Larson, R. (1991). The decline of subject searching: Long-term, trends and patterns of index use in an online catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42(3), 197-215.
19. Larson, R. (1992). Evaluation of advanced retrieval techniques in an experimental online catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 34-53.
20. Lau, E., & Goh, D. (2006). In search of query patterns: A case study of a university OPAC Information Processing & Management, 42(5), 13161329.
21. Li, H., & Deng, S. (2008). Linking location and shelf mapping from OPAC search results: With reference to Wichita State University. New Library World, 109(3/4), 107-116.
22. Mattison, D. (2005). RedLightGreen and Open WorldCat. Searcher, 13(4), 14-23.
23. Neal, D. (2007). Introduction: Folksonomies and image tagging: Seeing the future? Bulletin of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 34(1), 7-12.
24. Novotny, E. (2004). I don't think I click: A protocol analysis study of use of a library online catalog in the Internet Age. College and Research Libraries, 65(6), 525-537.
25. Ogawa, Y., Morita, T., & Kobayashi, K. (1991). A fuzzy document retrieval system using the keyword connection matrix and learning method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 39, 163-179.
26. Pera, M.S., & Ng, Y.-K. (2009). SpamED: A spam email detection approach based on phrase similarity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 393-409.
27. Proffitt, M. (2005). How to "Google" your library catalog. NLA News, XV(4). National Library of Australia. Available at: http://www.nla.gov.au/ pub/nlanews/2005/jan05/article1.html
28. Rethlefsen, M. (2007a). LJ talks to mastermind of the LibraryThing Web Site, Bookhound Tim Spalding. Library Journal. Retrieved March 17, 2009, from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6403633.html
29. Rethlefsen, M. (2007b). Tags help make libraries Del.icio.us: Social bookmarking and tagging boost participation. Library Journal, 15, 26-28.
30. Starr, J. (2007). LibraryThing.com.: The Holy Grail of book recommendation engines. Searcher, 15(7), 25-32.
31. Yu,H.,&Young,M.(2004). TheimpactofWebsearchenginesonsubjectsearchinginOPAC. InformationTechnologyandLibraries,23(4),168-180.(Pubitemid40350681)