Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: Tool development and simulation

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Chien, Tsair Wei ^a,b   Wu, Hing Man ^a   Castillo, Roberto Vasquez ^d   Wang, Weng Chung ^c   Chou, Willy ^a  

^a CHI MEI MEDICAL CENTER   (Taiwan)

^b CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

^c THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^d SILAIS ^*  (Nicaragua)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FRENCHAY ACTIVITIES INDEX; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; RASCH ANALYSIS; STROKE PATIENT; TIME; TIME SAVE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STROKE; TAIWAN; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; TAIWAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 66749083252     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-39     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Motion C5 Improving Quality of Care and Nursing Workflow: A Clinician Usability Pilot of the Motion Mobile Clinical Assistant 2007
2. Krogh PR Rough S Thomley S Comparison of two personal-computer-based mobile devices to support pharmacists' clinical documentation Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008, 15, 65(2):154-7. 10.2146/ajhp070177
3. Wu M Rhyner PM Thao C Kraniak L Cronk C Cruise K A tablet-PC application for the individual family service plan (IFSP) J Med Syst 2007, 31(6):537-41. 10.1007/s10916-007-9095-7 18041288
4. Lord FM Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1980
5. Pedersen PM Jorgensen HS Nakayama H Raaschou HO Olsen TS Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke: The Copenhagen Stroke Study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997, 78:161-165. 10.1016/ S0003-9993(97)90258-6 9041897
6. Wainer HW Dorans NJ Flaugher R Green BF Mislevy RJ Steinberg L Thissen D Computerized adaptive testing: A primer Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1990
7. Weiss DJ Mcbride JR Bias and information of Bayesian adaptive testing Applied Psychological Measurement 1984, 8(3):273-285. 10.1177/ 014662168400800303
8. Rasch G Probabilistic models for some Intelligence and attainment tests Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1960
9. Hsueh IP Wang WC Sheu CF Hsieh CL Rasch analysis of combining two indices to assess comprehensive ADL function in stroke patients Stroke 2004, 35:721-726. 10.1161/01.STR.0000117569.34232.76 14963275
10. Kelly-Hayes M Robertson JT Broderick JP Duncan PW Hershey LA Roth EJ Thies WH Trombly CA The American Heart Association stroke outcome classification Stroke 1998, 29:1274-1280. 9626308
11. Hsieh CL Hsueh IP A cross-validation of the comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living after stroke cand J Rehabil Med 1999, 31:83-88. 10.1080/003655099444588
12. Duncan PW Lai SM Bode RK Perera S DeRosa J Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function Neurology 2003, 60:291-296. 10.1001/archneur.60.2.291 12552047
13. Lai SM Perera S Duncan PW Bode R Physical and social functioning after stroke: Comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36 Stroke 2003, 34:488-493. 10.1161/01.STR.0000054162.94998.C0 12574565
14. Linacre JM WINSTEPS [computer program] Chicago, IL http:// www.winsteps.com
15. Wang W-C Chen C-T Item parameter recovery, standard error estimate and fit statistics of the WINSTEPS program for the family of Rasch models Educational and Psychological Measurement 65, 376-404. 10.1177/ 0013164404268673
16. Wright BD Masters GN Rating acale analysis Chicago, Ill: MESA Press 1982
17. Embretson S Reise S Item Response Theory for Psychologists L. NJ: Erlbaum Mahwah 2000 Chapter 7
18. Linacre JM Comparing "Partial Credit" and "Rating Scale" Models Rasch Measurement Transactions 2000, 14(3):768.
19. Linacre JM Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness J Appl Meas 2002, 3(1):85-106. 11997586
20. Wright BD Linacre M Reasonable Mean-square Fit Values Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994, 8:3.
21. Wright BD Mok M Rasch models overview J Appl Meas 2000, 1:83-106. 12023559
22. Weiss DJ Improvement measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing Applied Psychological Measurement 1982, 6:473-492. 10.1177/ 014662168200600408
23. Weiss DJ Adaptive testing by computer Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1985, 3:774-789. 10.1037/0022-006X.53.6.774