Using the self-select paradigm to delineate the nature of speech motor programming

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 755-765

  Wright, David L ^a   Robin, Don A ^b   Rhee, Jooyhun ^a   Vaculin, Amber ^a   Jacks, Adam ^b,d   Guenther, Frank H ^c   Fox, Peter T ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Memory; Motor programming; Motor response; Speech

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 66649125288     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0256)     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ballard, K. J., Granier, J. P., & Robin, D. A. (2000). Understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: Theory, analysis, and treatment. Aphasiology, 14, 969-995.
2. Bohland, J. W., & Guenther, F. H. (2006). An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production. NeuroImage, 32, 821-841.
3. Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205-235.
4. Deger, K., & Ziegler, W. (2002). Speech motor programming in apraxia of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 321-335.
5. Dogil, G., Ackermann, H., Grodd, W., Haider, H., Kamp, H., Mayer, J., et al. (2002). The speaking brain: A tutorial introduction to fMRI experiments in the production of speech, prosody, and syntax. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 59-90.
6. Ferrand, L., & Segui, J. (1998). The syllable's role in speech production: Are syllables chunks, schemas, or both? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 253-258.
7. Guenther, F. H. (2003). Neural control of speech movements. In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 209-239). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96, 280-301.
9. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction.ResearchQuarterly, 31, 448-458.
10. Immink, M. A., & Wright, D. L. (2001). Motor programming during practice conditions high and low in contextual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 423-437.
11. Kimbrough, S. K., Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2001). Reducing the saliency of intentional stimuli results in greater contextual-dependent performance. Memory, 9, 133-143.
12. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027.
13. Klapp, S. T. (1996). Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 13-34). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14. Klapp, S. T. (2003). Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 135-150.
15. Klapp, S., Abbott, J., Coffman, K., Greim, D., Snider, R., & Young, F. (1979). Simple and choice reaction-time methods in the study of motor programming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 91-101.
16. Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., & Berrian, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 368-374.
17. Klapp, S. T., McRae, L. E., & Long, W. (1978). Response programming vs. alternative interpretations of the "ditdah" reaction time effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 5-6.
18. Klapp, S. T., Wyatt, E. P., & Lingo, W. M. (1974). Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 263-271.
19. Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes, and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22.
20. Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239-269.
21. Magnuson, C. E., Robin, D. A., & Wright, D. L. (2008). Sequencing multiple elements of the same duration: Detailing the INT process in Klapp's two-process account of motor programming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 532-544.
22. Magnuson, C. E., Wright, D. L., & Verwey, W. (2004). Changes in the incidental context impacts search but not loading of the motor buffer. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 935-951.
23. McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., & Wambaugh, J. (2000). Apraxia of speech: A treatable disorder of motor planning and programming. In S. E. Nadeau, L. J. Gonzales Rothi, & B. Crosson (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice (pp. 221-266). New York: Guilford.
24. McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation, and treatment. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 311-344). New York: Thieme.
25. Nijland, L., Maassen, B., & van der Meulen, S. (2003). Evidence of motor programming deficits in children diagnosed with DAS. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 437-450.
26. Nijland, L., Maassen, B., van der Meulen, S., Gabreëls, F., Kraaimaat, F. W., & Schreuder, R. (2003). Planning of syllables in children with developmental apraxia of speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17, 1-24.
27. Riecker, A., Ackermann, H., Wildgruber, D., Meyer, J., Dogil, G., Haider, H., & Grodd, W. (2000). Articulatory/phonetic sequencing at the level of the anterior perisylvian cortex: A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. Brain and Language, 75, 259-276.
28. Riecker, A., Mathiak, K., Wildgruber, D., Erb, M., Hertlich, I., Grodd, W., & Ackermann, H. (2005). fMRI reveals two distinct cerebral networks subserving speech motor control. Neurology, 64, 700-706.
29. Rushworth, M. F. S., Johansen-Berg, H., Goebel, S. M., & Devlin, J. T. (2003). The left parietal and premotor cortices: Motor attention and selection. NeuroImage, 20, 89-100.
30. Sevald, C. A., Dell, G. S., & Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 807-820.
31. Shuster, L. I., & Lemieux, S. K. (2005). An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words. Brain and Language, 93, 20-31.
32. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. R., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapidmovement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
33. van der Merwe, A. (1997). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 1-25). New York: Thieme.
34. Verwey, W. B. (1999). Evidence for amultistagemodel of practice in a sequential movement task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1693-1708.
35. Wright, D. L., Black, C. B., Immink, M. A., Brueckner, S., & Magnuson, C. (2004). Long-term motor programming improvements occur via concatenating movement sequences during random but not blocked practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 39-50.
36. Ziegler, W., & Maassen, B. (2004). The role of the syllable in disorders of spoken language production. In B. Maassen, R. Kent, H. Peters, P. Lieshout, & V. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 415-445). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.