Is a shared decision-making approach effective in improving hypertension management?

Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 266-270

  Deinzer, Anja ^a   Veelken, Roland ^a   Kohnen, Ralf ^b   Schmieder, Roland E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b Inst Med Res Mgmt and Biometr   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; KNOWLEDGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 66649096451     PISSN: 15246175     EISSN: 17517176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00112.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cogolludo A, Perez-Vizcaino F, Tamargo J. New insights in the pharmacological therapy of arterial hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005;14:423-427.
2. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2007;25:1105-1187.
3. Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA. 2003;289:2363-2369.
4. Ross SD, Akhras KS, Zhang S, et al. Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs due to adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:940-953.
5. Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment in patients with high blood pressure in ambulatory settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004:CD004804.
6. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301-312.
7. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, et al. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23-30.
8. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, et al. Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21:347-354.
9. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: The competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:892-899.
10. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, et al. Shared decision making: Developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:93-99.
11. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, et al. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: A systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;43:5-22.
12. Montgomery AA, Harding J, Fahey T. Shared decision making in hypertension: The impact of patient preferences on treatment choice. Fam Pract. 2001;18:309-313.
13. Fleischmann EH, Friedrich A, Danzer E, et al. Intensive training of patients with hypertension is effective in modifying lifestyle risk factors. J Hum Hypertens. 2004;18:127-131.
14. Deinzer A, Hegemann T, Veelken R, et al. [A model project on shared decision-making in the treatment of arterial hypertension]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2004;146:48-50.
15. Hahn SR, Thompson KS, Wills TA, et al. The difficult doctor-patient relationship: Somatization, personality and psychopathology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:647-657.
16. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B, et al. Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: Results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:283-298.
17. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, et al. The development of COMRADE - a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:311-322.
18. Danzer E, Gallert K, Friedrich A, et al. [Results of an intensive training program for hypertension at the Institute for Preventive Medicine]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000;125:1385-1389.
19. Danzer E, Gallert K, Henke J, et al. [Nurnberg Prevention Survey. "Prevention yes -but only when no effort is required"]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2000;142:46.
20. Moser M, Franklin SS. Hypertension management: Results of a new national survey for the hypertension education foundation: Harris interactive. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007;9:316-323.
21. Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, et al. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making? Health Expect. 2004;7:317-326.
22. Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, et al. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277:350-356.
23. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1972.