Metaphor foundations in creativity research: Boundary vs. organism

Journal of Creative Behavior

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-28

  Moran, Seana ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 66349110795     PISSN: 00220175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01303.x     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. BAUGHMAN, W. A., & MUMFORD, M. D. (1995). Process-analytic models of creative capacities: Operations influencing the combination-and-reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37-62.
2. BLACK, M. (1993). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed,), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19-41). Cambridge, OK: Cambridge University Press.
3. BLANCHETTE, 1. & DUNBAR, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 108-124.
4. BOGARTZ, R. S. (1994). The future of dynamic systems models in developmental psychology in the light of the past. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 289-319.
5. BOURDIEU, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. BRUNER, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In J.S. Bruner, On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge University Press.
7. CAMPBELL, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
8. CAREY, S., & SPELKE, E. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L.A. Hirschfeld & S.A. Gelman, (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity In cognition and culture (pp. 169-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. CAVANAGH, P. (3/17/2005). The artist as neuroscientist. Nature, 434 (7031), 301-307.
10. CHURCHLAND, P. (2000). To transform the phenomena: Feyerabend, proliferation, and recurrent neural networks. In J. Preston, G. Munevar, & D. Lamb (Eds.), The worst enemy of science? Essays in memory of Paul Feyerabend (pp. 148-158). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. CLAXTON, G. (1997). Hare brain tortoise mind: How intelligence Increases when you think less. New York: HarperCollins.
12. CORNEUSSEN, J. P. (2006). Metaphor and the dynamics of knowledge in organization theory: A case study of the organizational identity metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4), 683-709.
13. CUPCHIK, G. C. (2007). A critical reflection on Arnheim's Gestalt theory of aesthetics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1 (1), 16-24.
14. CS1KSZENTMIHALYI, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity(pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press,
15. CSIKSZENTMIHALY1, M. (1990). Flow. New York: HarperPerennial.
16. DANZIGER, K. (1990). Generative metaphor and the history of psychological discourse. In D.E. Leary (Ed.), Metaphor In the history of psychology (pp. 331-356). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. DASGUPTA, S. (2004). Is creativity a Darwinian process? Creativity Research Journal, 16, 403-413.
18. DAWKINS, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. DUNBAR, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & S. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery, and change (pp. 46M93). Washington, DC: APA Press.
20. DUNBAR, K. & BLANCHETTE, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5 (8), 334-339.
21. EINSTEIN, A. (1949). Autobiographical notes (P. A. Schlipp, Trans. & Ed.). La Salle, 1L: Open Court Publishing.
22. FEIST, G. J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. FELDHUSEN, J. F., & GOH, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8 (3), 231-247.
24. FINKE, R. A., WARD, T. B., & SMITH, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. GARDNER, H (1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 8-26.
26. GENTNER, D., & GRUDIN, J. (1985). The evolution of mental metaphors in psychology: A 90-year retrospective. American Psychologist, 40 (2), 181-192.
27. GHISEL1N, B. (1952). The creative process. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
28. GIQERENZER, G., & GOLDSTEIN, D.G. (1996). Mind as computer: Birth of a metaphor. Creativity Research Journal, 9 (2&3), 131-144.
29. GOLDWATER, R., & TREVES, M. (Eds.). (1972). Artists on art: From the XIV to the XX centuries. New York: Pantheon Books.
30. GORMAN, M. E. (2006). Scientific and technological thinking. Review of General Psychology, 10 (2), 113-129.
31. GROTZER, T. A., & BELL, B. (1999). Negotiating the funnel: Guiding students toward understanding elusive generative concepts. In L. Hetland & S. Veema (Eds.), The Project Zero classroom: Views on understanding. Fellows and Trustees of Harvard College. Cambridge, MA
32. GRUBER, H. E. (1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. New York: Dutton.
33. GRUBER, H. E. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In D.B. Wallace & H.E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
34. GRUBER, H. E. & BODECKER, K. (2005). Creativity, psychology and the history of science. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
35. Guastello, S. J. (1995). Facilitative style, individual innovation, and emergent leadership in problem solving groups. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29 (4), 225-239.
36. GUASTELLO, S. J. (1998). Creative problem solving groups at the edge of chaos. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(1), 38-57.
37. HOLTON, G. (1973). Thematic origins of scientific thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. HOLYOAK, K. J., & THAGARD, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. INDURKHYA, B. (2007). Rationality and reasoning with metaphors. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 16-36.
40. JAMES, W. (1890/1981). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. JEFFREY, B., & CRAFT, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30 (1), 77-87.
42. JOHN-STEINER, V. (1985). Notebooks of the mind: Explorations of thinking. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
43. JOHN-STEINER, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. KELLER, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
45. KCJHN, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12 (1), 1-8.
46. KUHN, D., & PEARSALL, S. (2000). Developmental origins of scientific thinking. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 113-129.
47. KUHN, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. LAKOFF, G., & JOHNSON, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. LAKOFF, G., & JOHNSON, M. (1997). Philosophy in the flesh. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. LARKIN, J. H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 75-98). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
51. LEARY, D. E. (Ed.). (1990). Metaphors in the history of psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. LEVINE, D. N. (1995, Jun 22). The organism metaphor in sociology. Social Research. New York: New School of Social Research.
53. MARTINDALE, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.
54. MESOUDI, A. (2007). Using the methods of experimental social psychology to study cultural evolution. Journal of Social, Evolutionary & Cultural Psychology, 1(2), 35-58.
55. MILLER, A. 1. (1996). Metaphors in creative scientific thought. Creativity Research Journal, 9 (2&3), 113-130.
56. MORAN, S. (2008). Creativity: A systems perspective. In T. Rickards, M. Runco, & S. Moger (Eds.), The Routledge companion to creativity (pp 292-301). London: Routledge.
57. MORAN, S. (2009a). Creativity in the schools. In K. Uttleton, C. Wood, & J.K. Staarman (Eds.), Elsevier handbook of educational psychology: New perspectives on learning and teaching. London: Elsevier.
58. MORAN, S. (2009b, in press). What role does commitment play among writers with dirrerent levels of creativity influence? Creativty Research Journal.
59. MORAN, S., & JOHN-STEINER, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky's contribution to the dialectic of creativity and development. In K. Sawyer et al., Creativity and development (pp. 61-90). New York: Oxford University Press.
60. MUMFORD, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock of creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15 (2 & 3), 107-120.
61. MUMFORD, M. D., BAUGHMAN, W. A., MAHER, M. A., COSTANZA, D. P., & SUPINSK1, E. P. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: IV. Category combination. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 77-85.
62. NELSON, R. R., & WINTER, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. NEW, R. (1992). The integrated early childhood curriculum: New perspectives from research and practice. In C. Seefeldt (Ed.), The early childhood curriculum: A review of current research. Revised edition. New York: Teachers College Press.
64. PERKINS, D. N. (1988). The possibility of invention. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity(pp. 362-385). New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. PERKINS, D. N., &GROZTER, T.A. (1997). Teaching intelligence. American Psychologist, 52 (10), 1125-1133.
66. POLANYI, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
67. POPPER, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
68. PURSER, R. A., & MONTUOR1, A. (Eds.) (1999). Social creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
69. RUNCO, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47 (3), 317-324.
70. RUNCO, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.
71. RINALDI, S., CQRDONE, R., & CASAQRANDI, R, (2000). Instabilities In creative professions: A minimal model. Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences, 4 (3), 255-273.
72. SAWYER, R. K. (1992). Improvisational creativity: An analysis of Jazi performers. Creativity Research Journal, 5 (4), 253-263.
73. SAWYER, R. K. (1999). The emergence of creativity, Philosophical Psychology, 12 (4), 447-469.
74. SAWYER, R. K. (2002). Emergence In psychology: Lessons from the history of non-reductionist science. Human Development, 45, 2-28.
75. SAWYER, R. K. (2003), Emergence in creativity and development, In R,K. Sawyer et al., Creativity and development (Counterpoint series, pp, 12-60). New York: Oxford University Press.
76. SCOTT, Q. M., LQNERQAN, D.C., & MCJMFORD, M.D. (2005). Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17 (1), 79-98.
77. SIMONTON, D. K. (1991). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (5), 829-840.
78. SIMONTON, D. K. (1999a). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10 (4), 309-328,
79. SIMONTON, D. K. (1999b), Talent and its development: An emergenlc and eplgenetic model. Psychological Review, 106(3), 435-457.
80. SIMONTON, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 151-158.
81. SIMONTON, D. K. (2005). Darwin as straw man: Dasgupta's (2004) evaluation of creativity as a Darwinian process. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 299-308.
82. SIMONTON, D. K. (2006). Scientific status of disciplines, individuals, and Ideas: Empirical analysis of the potential impact of theory. Journal of General Psychology, 10 (2), 98-112.
83. STACEY, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
84. STERNBERG, R. J., & LUBART, T. 1. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity In a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
85. THAGARD, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
86. THELEN, E., & SMITH, L. B. (1998), Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lemer (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 563-634), New York: Wiley.