The National Joint Registry may fail to collect accurate, validated anaesthetic data

Anaesthesia

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 694-695

  Howes, B W ^a   Clarke, P A ^a   Cook, T M ^a  

^a ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIST; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PUBLICATION; REGISTER; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANESTHESIA; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; ENGLAND; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; WALES;

EID: 66349090483     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05956.x     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. The National Joint Register. 4th Annual Report. 2006-2007 http://www-new.njrcentre.org.uk/ (accessed 6 January 2009).
2. Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JAW on behalf of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the 3rd National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Third National Audit Project. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009; 102: 179-190
3. Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z. A comparison of neuraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2006; 103: 1018-1025 (Pubitemid 44576715)
4. Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, Myles PS. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008; 100: 154-164