Clausal coordination and coordinative ellipsis in a model of the speaker

Linguistics

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 653-696

  Kempen, Gerard ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 66249101589     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/LING.2009.022     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Beaver, John & Ivan A. Sag. 2004. Coordinate ellipsis and apparent non-constituent coordination. In Müller, Stefan (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG04 Conference, Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, August 3-6, 2004, 48-69. Stanford CA: CSLI. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/HPSG/5/ (accessed 23 February 2009).
2. Brants, Sabine, Stefanie Dipper, Peter Eisenberg, Silvia Hansen-Schirra, Esther König, Wolfgang Lezius, Christian Rohrer, George Smith & Hans Uszkoreit. 2004. TIGER: Linguistic interpretation of a German corpus. Research on Language and Computation 2. 597-620.
3. Büring, Daniel & Katharina Hartmann. 1998. Asymmetrische Koordination. Linguistische Berichte 174. 172-201.
4. De Vries, Mark. 2003. Three-dimensional grammar. In Linguistics in The Netherlands 2003. 201-212.
5. De Vries, Mark. 2006. The syntax of appositive relativization: On specifying coordination, false free relatives, and promotion. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 229-270.
6. Dik, Simon. 1968. Coordination: Its implications for the theory of general linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7. Frank, Anette. 2002. A (discourse) functional analysis of asymmetric coordination. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.) Proceedings of the LFG'02 Conference, National Technical University of Athens, 174-196. Stanford, CA: CSLI Online Publications. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/ LFG/7/lfg02.pdf (accessed 23 February 2009).
8. Goodall, Grant. 1987. Parallel structures in syntax: Coordination, causatives, and restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Grootveld, Marjan. 1992. On the representation of coordination. Linguistics in The Netherlands 1992. 61-73.
10. Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap De Rooij & Maarten C. Van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
11. Harbusch, Karin & Gerard Kempen. 2002. A quantitative model of word order and movement in English, Dutch and German complement constructions. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING2002), Taipei (Taiwan). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C/C02/C02-1034. pdf (accessed 31 March 2009).
12. Harbusch, Karin & Gerard Kempen. 2006. ELLEIPO: A module that computes coordina-tive ellipsis for language generators that don't. In EACL-2006: 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Trento, Italy; April 2006). http://aclweb.org/ anthology/E/E06/E06-2008.pdf (accessed 31 March 2009).
13. Haspelmath, Martin (ed.). 2004. Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Hendriks, Petra A. 2004. Coherence relations, ellipsis and contrastive topics. Journal of Semantics 21. 133-153.
15. Heycock, Caroline & Anthony Kroch. 1994. Verb movement and coordination in a dynamic theory of licensing. The Linguistic Review 11. 257-283.
16. Höhle, Tilman. 1983. Subjektlücken in Koordinationen. Unpublished manuscript, Tübingen University. http://www.linguistik.uni- tuebingen.de/hoehle/manuskripte/SLF-W5.1-neu.pdf (accessed 31 March 2009).
17. Hudson, Richard A. 1976. Conjunction reduction, gapping, and right-node raising. Language 52. 535-562.
18. Johannessen, Janne B. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Johnson, Kyle. 2002. Restoring exotic coordinations to normalcy. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 97-156.
20. Kathol, Andreas. 1999. Linearization vs. phrase structure in German coordination constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 10. 303-342.
21. Kathol, Andreas. 2000. Linear syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Kempen, Gerard. 1977. Conceptualizing and formulating in sentence production. In S. Rosenberg (ed.), Sentence production: Developments in research and theory, 259-274. Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Kempen, Gerard. 1987. A framework for incremental syntactic tree formation. Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'87). http:// dli.iiit.ac.in/ijcai/IJCAI-87- VOL2/PDF/011.pdf (accessed 31 March 2009).
24. Kempen, Gerard. 1991. Conjunction reduction and gapping in clause-level coordination: an inheritance-based approach. Computational Intelligence 7. 357-360.
25. Kempen, Gerard & Eduard Hoenkamp. 1987. An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science 11. 201-258.
26. Kempen, Gerard & Pieter Huijbers. 1983. The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words. Cognition 14. 185-209.
27. Kraak, Remmert & Wim Klooster. 1968. Syntaxis. Culemborg: Stam-Kemperman.
28. Lechner, Winfried. 2004. Ellipsis in comparatives. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. Levelt, Willem J. M. 1983. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14. 41-104.
30. Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Neijt, Anneke. 1980 [1979]. Gapping: A contribution to sentence grammar, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Foris.
32. Pijls, Fieny & Gerard Kempen. 1986. Een psycholinguïstisch model voor syntactische samentrekking. De Nieuwe Taalgid 79. 217-234.
33. Postal, Paul. 1974. On raising: one rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Reich, Ingo. 2008. From discourse to "odd coordinations": On asymmetric coordination and subject gaps in German. In Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds.), 'Subordination' versus 'coordination' in sentence and text: A cross-linguistic perspective, 281-303. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
35. Ross, John R. 1986 [1967]. Infinite syntax! (Language and Being). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.]
36. Sag, Ivan A., Thomas Wasow & Emily M. Bender. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
37. Schwabe, Kerstin & Ning Zhang (eds.). 2000. Ellipsis in conjunction. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
38. Schwarz, Bernhard. 1998. On odd coordinations in German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2. 191-219.
39. Seuren, Pieter A. M. 1996. Semantic syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Slobin, Dan I. 1996. From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking." In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Steedman, Mark. 2000. The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Sturm, Arie. 1995. SGF-coördinatie bij nader inzien: verklaring van de eigenschappen en on-gehoorde mogelijkheden. De Nieuwe Taalgids 88. 333-353. te Velde, John. 2006. Deriving coordinate symmetries: A phase-based approach integrating Select, Merge, Copy and Match. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Vallduví, Enric & Elisabet Engdahl (1996). The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34. 459-519.
44. Van Oirsouw, Robert R. 1987. The syntax of coordination. London: Croom Helm.
45. van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1998. Trees and Scions - Science and trees. In Chomsky 70th Birthday Celebration Fest- Web-Page. http://cognet.mit.edu/ Books/celebration/essays/ riemsdyk.html (accessed 23 February 2009).
46. Van Wijk, Carel & Gerard Kempen. 1987. A dual system for producing self-repairs in spontaneous speech: evidence from experimentally elicited corrections. Cognitive Psychology 19.403-440.