A spatial model of bird abundance as adjusted for detection probability

Ecography

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 291-298

  Gorresen, P Marcos ^a   Mcmillan, Garnett P ^b   Camp, Richard J ^a   Pratt, Thane K ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIRD; DATA SET; ENDEMIC SPECIES; PROBABILITY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES RICHNESS;

ANIMALIA; AVES; HIMATIONE SANGUINEA; VESTIARIA; VESTIARIA COCCINEA;

EID: 66149175834     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05646.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agarwal, D. K. et al. 2002. Zero-inflated models with application to spatial count data Environ. Ecol. Stat. 9 : 41 355.
2. Atkinson, C. T. LaPointe, D. A. in press. Ecology and pathogenicity of avian malaria and pox Pratt, T. K. Conservation biology of Hawaiian forest birds: implications for island avifauna. Yale Univ. Press.
3. Atkinson, C. T. et al. 1995. Wildlife disease and conservation in Hawaii: pathogenicity of avian malaria Plasmodium relictum in experimentally infected iiwi Vestiaria coccinea Parasitology 111 : S59 S69.
4. Banko, P. C. Banko, W. E. in press. Evolution and ecology of food exploitation Pratt, T. K. Conservation biology of Hawaiian forest birds: implications for island avifauna. Yale Univ. Press.
5. Benning, T. L. et al. 2002. Interactions of climate change with biological invasions and land use in the Hawaiian islands: modeling the fate of endemic birds using a geographic information system Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 14246 14249. (Pubitemid 35257657)
6. Birdlife International. 2004. Threatened birds of the world: 2004. BirdLife International.
7. Buckland, S. T. et al. 2001. Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford Univ. Press.
8. Buckland, S. T. et al. 2004. Advanced distance sampling. Oxford Univ. Press.
9. Carlin, B. P. Louis, T. A. 2000. Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall.
10. ESRI. 2002. ArcGIS 8.0. Environmental Systems Research, Redlands, CA.
11. Gelfand, A. E. et al. 2005. Modelling species diversity through species level hierarchical modelling J. R. Stat. Soc. C Appl. Stat. 54 : 1 20. (Pubitemid 40166918)
12. Gorresen, P. M. et al. 2007. Forest bird distribution, density and trends in the Ka'(region of Hawai'i Island. U. S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Discipline. Open File Report 2007-1076.
13. Gorresen, P. M. et al. in press. Status and trends of native Hawaiian songbirds Pratt, T. K. Conservation biology of Hawaiian forest birds: implications for island avifauna. Yale Univ. Press.
14. Hedley, S. L. Buckland, S. T. 2004. Spatial models for line transect sampling J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 9 : 181 199. (Pubitemid 39342419)
15. Hooten, M. B. et al. 2003. Predicting the spatial distribution of ground flora on large domains using a hierarchical Bayesian model Landscape Ecol. 5 : 487 502. (Pubitemid 37417818)
16. Kuhnert, P. M. et al. 2005. Assessing the impacts of grazing levels on bird density in woodland habitat: a Bayesian approach using expert opinion Environmetrics 16 : 717 747. (Pubitemid 41539857)
17. Latimer, A. M. et al. 2006. Building statistical models to analyze species distributions Ecol. Appl. 16 : 33 50.
18. Legendre, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74 : 1659 1673. (Pubitemid 24408336)
19. Link, W. A. Sauer, J. R. 2002. A hierarchical analysis of population change with application to Cerulean warblers Ecology 83 : 2832 2840. (Pubitemid 36524711)
20. Link, W. A. et al. 2002. Of BUGS and birds: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo for hierarchical modeling in wildlife research J. Wildl. Manage. 66 : 277 291.
21. Liu, C. et al. 2005. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions Ecography 28 : 385 393. (Pubitemid 40809906)
22. Martin, T. G. et al. 2005. Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations Ecol. Lett. 8 : 1235 1246. (Pubitemid 41532407)
23. Neter, J. et al. 1996. Applied linear regression models. Irwin.
24. Pearson, S. M. et al. 1999. Landscape change and habitat availability in the southern Appalachian highlands and Olympic Peninsula Ecol. Appl. 9 : 1288 1304. (Pubitemid 29536904)
25. Reynolds, R. T. et al. 1980. A variable circular-plot method for estimating bird numbers Condor 82 : 309 313.
26. Royle, J. A. 2004a. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts Biometrics 60 : 108 115. (Pubitemid 38392622)
27. Royle, J. A. 2004b. Generalized estimators of avian abundance from count survey data Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 27 : 375 386. (Pubitemid 40958929)
28. Royle, J. A. Nichols, J. D. 2003. Estimating abundance from repeated presence-absence data or point counts Ecology 84 : 777 790. (Pubitemid 36893064)
29. Royle, J. A. et al. 2002. Statistical mapping of count survey data Scott, J. M. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press 625 638.
30. Royle, J. A. et al. 2004. Modeling abundance effects in distance sampling Ecology 85 : 1591 1597. (Pubitemid 39188152)
31. Royle, J. A. et al. 2007. Hierarchical spatial models of abundance and occurrence from imperfect survey data Ecol. Monogr. 77 : 465 481.
32. SAS. 2001. SAS 8.02. SAS Inst.
33. Sauer, J. R. et al. 2005. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966-2005. Version 6.2.2006. U. S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.
34. Scott, J. M. et al. 1986. Forest bird communities of the Hawaiian Islands: their dynamics, ecology, and conservation. Studies in Avian Biology No. 9, Cooper Ornithological Society. Allen Press.
35. Scott, J. M. et al. 2002. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press.
36. Sokal, R. R. Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry. W. H. Freeman.
37. Spiegelhalter, D. J. et al. 2000. WinBUGS version 1.3. User manual. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit.
38. S-PLUS 6. 2001. Windows user's guide. Insightful Corporation.
39. Steenbergen, M. R. Jones, B. S. 2002. Modeling multilevel data structures Am. J. Pol. Sci. 46 : 218 237. (Pubitemid 33374097)
40. Stolwijk, A. M. et al. 1999. Studying seasonality by using sine and cosine functions in regression analysis J. Epidemiol. Community Health 53 : 235 238. (Pubitemid 29137686)
41. Thogmartin, W. E. et al. 2004. A hierarchical spatial model of avian abundance with application to Cerulean warblers Ecol. Appl. 14 : 1766 1779. (Pubitemid 40020365)
42. Thomas, A. et al. 2004. GeoBUGS user manual - version 1.2. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit.
43. Thomas, L. et al. 2005. Distance 5.0 Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, Univ. St Andrews.
44. Webster, R. A. et al. 2008. Bayesian spatial modeling of data from avian point count surveys J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 13 : 121 139.
45. Wikle, C. K. 2003. Hierarchical Bayesian models for predicting the spread of ecological processes Ecology 84 : 1382 1394. (Pubitemid 37435724)
46. Wikle, C. K. et al. 1998. Hierarchical Bayesian space-time models Environ. Ecol. Stat. 5 : 117 154. (Pubitemid 29033779)
47. Woodworth, B. L. et al. 2005. Host population persistence in the face of introduced vector-borne disease: Hawai'i Amakihi and avian malaria Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 1531 1536. (Pubitemid 40209203)
48. Yoccoz, N. G. et al. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time; concepts, methods and designs Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 446 453.