Relationship between tomm performance and PAI validity scales in a mixed clinical sample

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 523-533

  Whiteside, Douglas M ^a   Dunbar Mayer, Philip ^a   Waters, Dana P ^a  

^a ARGOSY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forensic assessment; PAI; Response bias; Symptom validity; TOMM

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW BIAS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL TEST; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PERSONALLITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY; RATING SCALE; STUDENT T TEST; TEST OF MEMORY MALINGERING; VALIDATION STUDY; ADULT; EVALUATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; COGNITION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 66149135622     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: 17444144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13854040802389169     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Boone, K. B., Lu, P., & Herzberg, D. (2002). Dot Counting Test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
2. Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI-2: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
4. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (2002). Applied multiple regression: Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
5. Green, P., Allen, L. M., & Astner, K. (1996). The Word Memory Test: A user's guide to the oral and computer administered forms, US version 1.1. Durham, NC: CogniSyst.
6. Greiffenstein, M. F., Gola, T., & Baker, W. J. (1995). MMPI-2 validity scales versus domain specific measures in the detection of factitious traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 230-240.
7. Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Love, J. M., Brenna, A., & Heinly, M. T. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of MMPI-2 validity scales and indicators to malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 491-512.
8. Haggerty, K. A., Frazier, T. W., Busch, R. M., & Naugle, R. I. (2007). Relationship among Victoria Symptom Validity Test indices and Personality Assessment Inventory validity scales in a large clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 917-928.
9. Kilgore, W. D., & DellaPietra, L. (2000). Using the WMS-III to detect malingering: Empirical validation of the rarely missed index (RMI). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 761-771.
10. Lees-Haley, P. R., Iverson, G. L., Lange, R. T., Fox, D. D., & Allen, L. M. (2003). Malingering in forensic neuropsychology: Daubert and the MMPI-2. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3, 167-203.
11. Lezak, M., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. McCaffrey, R. J., O'Bryant, S. E., Ashendorf, L., & Fisher, J. M. (2003). Correlations among the TOMM, Rey-15 item and MMPI-2 validity scales in a sample of TBI litigants. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3, 45-54.
13. Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14. Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
15. Nelson, N. W., Sweet, J. J., Berry, D. T. R., Bryant, F. B., & Granacher, R. P. (2007). Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: Exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 440-449.
16. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Martin, M. A., & Vitacco, M. J. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10, 160-177.
17. Sharland, M. J., & Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 213-223.
18. Slick, D., Hopp, G., Strauss, E., & Spellacy, F. J. (1996). Victoria Symptom Validity Test: Efficiency for detecting feigned memory impairment and relationship to neuropsychological tests and MMPI-2 validity scales. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 911-922.
19. Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
20. Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Sumanti, M., Brauer-Boone, K., Savodnik, I., & Gorsuch, R. (2006). Noncredible psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in a workers' compensation "stress" claim sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 754-765.
22. Temple, R. O., McBride, A. M., Horner, M. D., & Taylor, R. M. (2003). Personality characteristics of patients showing suboptimal cognitive effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 402-409.
23. Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). New York: Multi Health Systems.