A survey of neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 213-223

  Sharland, Michael J ^a,b   Gfeller, Jeffrey D ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Effort; Malingering; Neuropsychology; Survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALIFORNIA VERBAL LEARNING TEST; COMPUTERIZED ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSE BIAS; F K RATIO; HEALTH SURVEY; MALINGERING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; REY 15 ITEM TEST; TEST OF MEMORY MALINGERING; VALIDITY INDICATOR PROFILE; VICTORIA SYMPTOM VALIDITY TEST; WORD MEMORY TEST;

EID: 33847699337     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: 18735843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Binder L.M. The Portland Digit Recognition Test: A review of validation data and clinical use. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology 2 (2002) 27-41
2. Binder L.M., and Rohling M.L. Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed head injury. American Journal of Psychiatry 153 (1996) 7-10
3. Bush S.S. Independent and court-ordered forensic neuropsychological examinations: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 20 (2005) 997-1007
4. Cheng E.K., and Yoon A.H. Does Frye or Daubert matter? A study of scientific admissibility standards. Virginia Law Review 91 (2005) 471-513
5. Greiffenstein M.F., Baker W.J., and Gola T. Comparison of multiple scoring methods for Rey's malingered amnesia measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 11 (1996) 283-293
6. Hartmann D. The unexamined lie is a lie worth fibbing. Neuropsychological malingering and the Word Memory Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 17 (2002) 709-714
7. Inman T.H., and Berry D.T. Cross-validation of indicators of malingering: A comparison of nine neuropsychological tests, four tests of malingering, and behavioral observations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 17 (2002) 1-23
8. Johnson J.L., and Lesniak-Karpiak K. The effect of warning on malingering on memory and motor tasks in college samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 12 (1997) 231-238
9. Lally S. What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34 (2003) 491-498
10. Larrabee G.J. Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 17 (2003) 410-425
11. Meyers J.E., and Volbrecht M.E. A validation of multiple malingering detection methods in a large clinical sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 18 (2003) 261-276
12. Millis S.R., and Volinsky C.T. Assessment of response bias in mild head injury: Beyond malingering tests. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 23 (2001) 809-828
13. Mittenberg W., Aguila-Puentes G., Patton C., Canyock E., and Heilbronner R. Neuropsychological profiling of symptom exaggeration and malingering. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology 3 (2002) 227-240
14. Mittenberg W., Patton C., Canyock E., and Condit D. Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 24 (2002) 809-828
15. Mossman D. Daubert, Cognitive malingering, and test accuracy. Law and Human Behavior 27 (2003) 229-249
16. Nies K.J., and Sweet J.J. Neuropsychological assessment and malingering: A critical review of past and present strategies. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 9 (1994) 501-552
17. Pankratz L. Malingering on intellectual and neuropsychological measures. In: Rogers R. (Ed). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (1988), Guilford Press, New York 169-194
18. Rabin L., Barr W., and Burton L. Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 20 (2005) 33-65
19. Reynolds C. Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (1998), Plenum Press, New York
20. Rose F.E., Hall S., Szalda-Petree A.D., and Bach P.J. A comparison of four tests of malingering and the effects of coaching. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 13 (1998) 349-363
21. Schretlen D., Brandt J., Krafft L., and Van Gorp W. Some caveats in using the Rey 15-item memory test to detect malingered amnesia. Psychological Assessment 3 (1991) 667-672
22. Slick D., Tan J., Strauss E., and Hultsch D. Detecting malingering: A survey of experts' practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19 (2004) 465-473
23. Spreen O., and Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary. 2nd ed. (1998), Oxford University Press, London
24. Sweet J., and King J. Category Test validity indicators: Overview and practice recommendations. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology 3 1-2 (2002) 241-274
25. Sweet J., Moberg J., and Suchy Y. Ten-year follow-up survey of clinical neuropsychologists: Part I. Practices and beliefs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 14 (2000) 18-37
26. Thompson G.B. The Victoria Symptom Validity Test: An enhanced test of symptom validity. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology 2 3-4 (2002) 43-67
27. Victor T.T., and Abeles N. Coaching clients to take psychological and neuropsychological tests: A clash of ethical obligations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 35 (2004) 373-379
28. Youngjohn J.R., Lees-Haley P.R., and Binder L.M. Comment: Warning malingerers produces more sophisticated malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 14 (1999) 511-515