Self-reported cognitive and emotional effects and lifestyle changes shortly after preventive cardiovascular consultations in general practice

Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 104-110

  Kehler, Dea ^a   Christensen, Morten Bondo ^a   Risør, Mette Bech ^b   Lauritzen, Torsten ^a   Christensen, Bo ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Denmark; Evaluation; Family practice; General practice; Preventive consultation; Questionnaire study; Risk of CVD

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; EMOTION; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; SMOKING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; LIFESTYLE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK FACTOR; SELF CONCEPT; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COGNITION; EMOTIONS; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SELF CONCEPT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 66149097768     PISSN: 02813432     EISSN: 15027724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02813430902793563     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: The competence of involving patients in health care choices. Br J of Gen Pract 2000;50:892-9.
2. Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11: 319-28.
3. Wilkin D, Hallam L, Doggett MA. Measures of need and outcome for primary health care. Oxford University Press; 1992.
4. Pascoe GC, Attkisson CC. The evaluation ranking scale: A new methodology for assessing satisfaction. Eval Program Plann 1983;6:335-47.
5. Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plan 1983;6:247-63.
6. Ware JE, Hays RD. Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with special medical encounters. Med Care 1988;26: 393-4.
7. Lewis JR. Patient views on quality of care in general practice: Literature review. Soc Sci Med 1994;39:655-70.
8. Baker R. The reliability and criterion validity of a measure of patients' satisfaction with general practice. Fam Pract 1991; 8:171-7.
9. Färnkvist L, Olofsson N, Weinehall L. Did a health dialogue matter? Self-reported cardiovascular disease and diabetes 11 years after health screening. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008; 26:135-9.
10. Rasmussen SR, Thomsen JL, Kilsmark J, Hveengaard A, Engberg M, Lauritzen T, Søgaard J. Preventive health screenings and health consultations in primary care increase life expectancy without increasing costs. Scand J Public Health Care 2007;35:365-72.
11. Thomsen JL, Karlsmose B, Parner ET, Thulstrup AM, Lauritzen T, Engberg M. Secondary healthcare contacts after multiphasic preventive health screening: A randomized trial. Scand J Public Health Care 2006;34:254-61.
12. Bach Nielsen KD, Dyhr L, Lauritzen T, Malterud K. Long-term impact of elevated cardiovascular risk detected by screening: A qualitative interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2005;23:233-8.
13. Kanstrup H, Refsgaard J, Engberg M, Lassen JF, Larsen ML, Laurizen T Cholesterol reduction following health screening in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002;20:219-23.
14. Thomsen JL, Lauritzen T, Engberg M. Preventive health examinations and health promotion in general practice for a middle-aged population. Ugeskr Laeger 2002;164:5240-1 (in Danish, no abstract available).
15. Engberg M, Christensen B, Karlsmose B, Lous J, Lauritzen T. General health screenings to improve cardiovascular risk profiles: A randomized controlled trial in general practice with 5-year follow-up. J Fam Pract 2000;51:546-52.
16. Hjerman I, Velve BK, Holme I, Leren P. Effect of diet and smoking intervention on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Report from the Oslo study group of randomized trial in healthy men. Lancet 1981;21:303-10.
17. Miettinen TA, Huttunen JK, Naukkarinan V, Strandberg T, Matilla S, Kumrin T, et al. Multifactorial prevention of cardiovascular diseases in middle aged men. Risk factor changes, incidence and mortality. JAMA 1985;254: 2097-102.
18. Wilhelmsen L, Berglund G, Elmfeldt D, Tibblin G, Wedel H, Pennert K, et al. The multifactor primary prevention trial in Goteborg, Sweden. Eur Heart J 1986;7:279-88.
19. Bernacki EJ, Tsai SP, Malone RD. Participation in a periodic physical examination program and group health care utilization and costs. J Occup Med 1988;30:949-52.
20. Christensen B, Engberg M, Lauritzen T. No long-term psychological reaction to information about increased risk of coronary heart disease in general practice. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004;11:239-43.
21. Steenkiste B, Weijden T, Timmermans D, Vaes J, Stoffers J, Grol R. Patients' ideas, fears and expectations of their coronary risk: Barriers for primary prevention. Patient Educ Couns 2004;55:301-7.
22. Van der Wiejden T, Van Steenkiste B, Stoffers HE, Timmersmans DR, Grol R. Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in general practice: Mismatch between cardiovascular risk and patients' risk perceptions. Med Decis Making 2007;27:754-61.
23. Christensen B. Guidelines in prevention of cardiovascular disease in general practice. 3rd ed. Danish Society of General Practitioners; 2007:1-49.
24. Frich JC, Malterud K, Fugelli P. How do patients at risk portray candidates for coronary heart disease? A qualitative interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2007;25:112-6.
25. Conroy RM, Pyörälä K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, et al. on behalf of the SCORE project group. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: The SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003;24: 987-1003.
26. Bjørner JB, Damsgaard M, Watt T, Bech P, Rasmussen NK, Kristensen TS, Modsvig J, Thunedborg K. The Danish manual of SF-36: A health status questionnaire about health status (in Danish). Copenhagen: Lif; 1997.
27. DIKE. Questionnaire about health and illness in Denmark 1994. 2nd ed. Danish Institute of Clinical Epidemiology.
28. Kehler D. Preventive cardiovascular consultations in general practice. PhD Thesis, Research Unit and Department of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark; 2008. 1st ed. p. 6-177.
29. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Holmes-Royner M, et al. The development of COMRADE: A patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns 2003;50:311-22.
30. Fayers P, Machin D. Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and interpretation, 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2001.
31. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurements scales: A practice guide to their development and use, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
32. Byrne PS, Long BEL. Doctor talking to patient. London: HMSO; 1976.
33. McWhinney LR. Why we need a new clinical method. In: Stewart M, Brown BB, Weston WW, et al, editors. Patient centred medicine: Transforming the clinical method. London: Sage Publications; 1995. p. 1-20.
34. Safran DG, Kosinski M, Talov AR, Rogers WH, Taira DH, Lieberman N, et al. The Primary Care Assessment Survey: Tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care 1998;36:728-39.
35. Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: A review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1829-43.
36. Grol R, Wensing M. Patients evaluate general/family practice. The EUROPEP instrument. 1ed. EQuiP, Wonca Region Europe; 2000.
37. Edwards C, Staniszweska S, Crichton N. Investigation of the ways in which patients' reports of their satisfaction with health care are constructed. Social Health Illn 2004;26: 159-83.
38. Brekke M, Rekdal M, Straand J. Which population groups should be targeted for cardiovascular prevention? A modelling study based on the Norwegian Hordaland Health Study (HUSK). Scand J Prim Health Care 2007;25:105-11.
39. Frich JC, Malterud K, Fugelli P. How do patients at risk portray candidates for coronary heart disease? Scand J Prim Health Care 2007;25:112-6.