Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1037-1046

  Ferguson, Stephen J ^a,h   Langhoff, Jens D ^b   Voelter, Katrin ^b   Von Rechenberg, Brigitte ^b   Scharnweber, Dieter ^c   Bierbaum, Susanne ^c   Schnabelrauch, Matthias ^d   Kautz, Armin R ^d   Frauchiger, Vinzenz M ^e   Mueller, Thomas L ^f   Lenthe, Harry Van ^g   Schlottig, Falko ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d Biomaterials Department   (Germany)

^e Dr Robert Mathys Foundation   (Switzerland)

^f ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^g Thommen Medical AG   (Switzerland)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Bisphosphonate; Collagen; Dental implant; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHOSPHONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BONE DENSITY CONSERVATION AGENT; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CHONDROITIN SULFATE; COLLAGEN; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL ETCHING; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ILIAC BONE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SHEEP; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE DENSITY CONSERVATION AGENTS; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CHONDROITIN SULFATES; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COLLAGEN; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DIPHOSPHONATES; ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES; ILIUM; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SHEEP; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TORQUE; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 66149088499     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. AlbrektssonT, Brȧnemark P-l, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J.Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long- lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.
2. Ratner BD, Porter SC. Surfaces in biology and biomaterials; description and characterization. In: Brash JLW (ed). Interfacial Phenomena and Bioproducts. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996:57-83.
3. Wieland M, Sittig C, Brunette DM,Textor M, Spencer ND. Measurement and evaluation of the chemical composition and topography of titanium implant surfaces. In: Davies JE (ed). Bone Engineering.Toronto:ed squared inc, 2000:163-182.
4. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
5. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
6. Buser D, Nydegger T,Oxland T,et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
7. Li D, Ferguson SJ, BeutlerT, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid- etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:325-332.
8. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: A prospective split- mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 ;12:572-578.
9. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al.The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants.Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153.
10. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-638.
11. Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, Belser UC, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:659-666.
12. Ferguson SJ, Broggini N,Wieland M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:291-297.
13. Schliephake H,Scharnweber D, Roesseler S,Dard M, Sewing A, Aref A. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:738-746.
14. Barrere F, Layrolle P, Van Blitterswijk CA, De Groot K. Biomimetic coatings on titanium: A crystal growth study of octacalcium phosphate. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001 ;12:529-534.
15. Cooper LF,Zhou Y.Takebe J, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation atTiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006;27:926-936.
16. Schuler M,Owen GR, Hamilton DW,et al. Biomimetic modification of titanium dental implant model surfaces using the RGDSP- peptide sequence: A cell morphology study. Biomaterials 2006; 27:4003-4015.
17. Rammelt S, lllert T, Bierbaum S, Scharnweber D, Zwipp H, Schneiders W. Coating of titanium implants with collagen, RGD peptide and chondroitin sulfate. Biomaterials 2006;27:5561-5571.
18. Michael J, Beutner R, Hempel U, Scharnweber D,Worch H, Schwenzer B. Surface modification of titanium-based alloys with bioactive molecules using electrochemically fixed nucleic acids. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;80:146-155.
19. Peter B, Gauthier O, Laib S, et al. Local delivery of bisphosphonate from coated orthopedic implants increases implants mechanical stability in osteoporotic rats. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006,76:133-143.
20. Fiorellini JP, Buser D, Riley E, Howell TH. Effect on bone healing of bone morphogenetic protein placed in combination with endosseous implants: A pilot study in beagle dogs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:41-47.
21. Jones AA, Buser D, Schenk R, Wozney J, Cochran DL The effect of rhBMP-2 around endosseous implants with and without membranes in the canine model. J Periodontol 2006,77:1184-1193.
22. Becker P, Neumann HG, Nebe B, Luthen F,Rychly J.Cellular investigations on electrochemically deposited calcium phosphate composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004; 15(4):437-440.
23. Frauchiger VM, Schlottig F, Gasser B,Textor M. Anodic plasma- chemical treatment of CP titanium surfaces for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2004;25:593-606.
24. Bierbaum S, DouglasT, Hanke T.et al. Collageneous matrix coatings on titanium implants modified with decorin and chondroitin sulfate: Characterization and influence on osteoblastic cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006,77:551-562. 25.
25. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J. Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: Potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 1998;139:663-670.
26. Nunamaker DM, Perren SM. A radiological and histological analysis of fracture healing using prebending of compression plates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979;167-174.
27. Lekholm U, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brȧnemark P-l, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds).Tissue- Integrated Prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence, 985:199-209.
28. Ruegsegger P, Koller B, Muller R. A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture.Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:24-29.
29. van Lenthe GH, Hagenmuller H, Bonner M, Hollister SJ, Meinel L, Muller R. Nondestructive micro-computed tomography for biological imaging and quantification of scaffold-bone interaction in vivo. Biomaterials 2007; 28:2479-2490.
30. Müller R, Hildebrand T, Häuselmann HJ, Rüegsegger P. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional structural properties of noninvasive bone biopsies using 3D-pQCT. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11(11):1745-1750.
31. Butz F, Ogawa T, Chang TL, Nishimura I.Three-dimensional bone- implant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:687-695.
32. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, et al. Use of micro-focus computerized tomography as a new technique for characterizing bone tissue around oral implants. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:5-12.
33. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
34. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-564.
35. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-543.
36. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:659-666.
37. Giavaresi G, Branda F, Causa F, et al. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl metha-crylate) biomimetic coating to improve osseointegration of a PMMA/HA/glass composite implant: In vivo mechanical and histomorphometric assessments. Int J Artif Organs 2004;27:674-680.
38. Sul YT, Byon ES, Jeong Y. Biomechanical measurements of calcium-incorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: Effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implant.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:101-110.
39. Gan L,Wang J, Tache A,Valiquette N, Deporter D, Pilliar R. Calcium phosphate sol-gel-derived thin films on porous-surfaced implants for enhanced osteoconductivity. Part II: Short-term in vivo studies. Biomaterials 2004;25:5313-5321. (Pubitemid 38521169)
40. Tache A, Gan L, Deporter D, Pilliar RM. Effect of surface chemistry on the rate of osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced Ti- 6AI-4V implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:19-29.
41. Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(suppl 1 ):S 13-20.
42. Wennerberg A. On Surface Roughness and Implant Incorporation [thesis]. Göteborg:Göteborg University, 1996.
43. Rammelt S, Schulze E, Bernhardt R,et al. Coating of titanium implants with type-l collagen. J Orthop Res 2004;22:1025-1034.
44. Morra M, Cassinelli C, Cascardo G, et al. Collagen l-coated titanium surfaces: Mesenchymal cell adhesion and in vivo evaluation in trabecular bone implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78: 449-458.
45. Morra M, Cassinelli C, Cascardo G, et al. Surface engineering of titanium by collagen immobilization. Surface characterization and in vitro and in vivo studies. Biomaterials 2003;24:4639-4654.
46. Yoshinari M,Oda Y,lnoueT,Matsuzaka K,Shimono M. Bone response to calcium phosphate-coated and bisphosphonate- immobilized titanium implants. Biomaterials 2002;23:2879-2885. (Pubitemid 34497078)
47. Peter B, Pioletti DP, Laib S, et al. Calcium phosphate drug delivery system: Influence of local zoledronate release on bone implant osteointegration. Bone 2005;36:52-60.