Attractive vicinities

Population, Space and Place

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-18

  Li, Wenjuan ^a   Holm, Einar ^a   Lindgren, Urban ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Hinterland; Local area; Place attractiveness; Sweden; Vicinity

Indexed keywords

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; LABOR MARKET; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATOR;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 66049163545     PISSN: 15448444     EISSN: 15448452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/psp.505     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anselin L. 2001. Spatial econometrics. In A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics, Baltagi BH (ed.). Basil Blackwell: Oxford; 310-330.
2. Boyer R, Savageau D. 1981. Place Rated Almanac. Rand McNally: Chicago.
3. Champion T, Green AE. 1987. The booming towns of Britain: the geography of economic performance in the 1980s. Geography 72: 97-108.
4. Coombes MG, Raybould S. 1988. Developing a Local Enterprise Activity Potential LEAP. Index. Built Environment 14: 107-117.
5. Eliasson K, Lindgren U, Westerlund O. 2003. Geographical labour mobility - migration or commuting? Regional Studies 37: 827-837.
6. Fischer PA, Holm E, Malmberg G, Straubhaar T. 1998. Why do people stay? The insider advantage approach: Empirical evidence from Swedish labour markets. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper Series, No. 1952.
7. Fotheringham A, Champion T, Wymer C, Coombes M. 2000. Measure destination attractivity: a migration example. International Journal of Population Geography 6: 391-421.
8. Garvill J, Lundholm E, Malmberg G, Westin K. 2004. Forced or free movers? The motives, voluntariness and selectivity of interregional migration in the Nordic countries. Population, Space and Place 10: 59-72.
9. Granovetter M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 6: 1360-1380.
10. Hägerstrand T. 1953. Innovationsförloppet ur korologisk synpunkt. PhD thesis. Meddelanden från Lunds universitets geografiska institution No. 25: Lund University, Sweden.
11. Håkansson J. 2000. Change population distribution in Sweden - long term trends and contemporary tendencies. PhD thesis. GERUM Kulturgeografi, Umeå University, Sweden.
12. Hampton K, Wellman B. 2003. Neighboring in Netville: how the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community 2: 277-311.
13. Holm E, Lindgren U, Malmberg G. 2004. Arbete och tillväxt i hela landet - betydelsen av arbetskraftsmobilisering. Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies: Östersund, Sweden.
14. Kontuly T. 1998. Contrasting the counterurbanisation experience in European nations. In Migration into Rural Areas - Theories and Issues, Boyle P, Halfacree K (eds). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester; 61-78.
15. Kontuly T, Schön KP. 1994. Changing western German internal migration system during the second half of the 1980s. Environment and Planning A 26: 1521-1543.
16. Lindgren U. 2003. Who is the counter-urban mover? Evidence from the Swedish urban system. International Journal of Population Geography 9: 399-418.
17. Mokhtarian P, Salomon I. 2001. How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A 35: 695-719.
18. Niedomysl T. 2004. Evaluating the effects of place-marketing campaigns on interregional migration in Sweden. Environment and Planning A 36: 1991-2009.
19. Öhman M, Lindgren U. 2003. Who is the long-distance commuter? - Patterns and driving forces in Sweden. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography 243.
20. Olsson S, Cruse G, Ohlander M. 1997. Det lilla grannskapet, Gårdar, trapphus och socialt liv. Centrum för byggnadskultur i västra Sverige: Göteborg, Sweden.
21. Redmond L, Mokhtarian P. 2001. The positive utility of the commute: modelling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation 28: 179-205.
22. Rogerson RJ, Findlay AM, Morris AS. 1989. Indicators of quality of life: some methodological issues. Environment and Planning A 21: 1655-1666.
23. Roos M. 2005. How important is geography for agglomeration? Journal of Economic Geography 5: 605-620.
24. Sandow E, Westin K. 2005. Att resa till arbetet i befolkningsmässigt glesa miljöer. Transport Research Unit, Umeå University: Umeå, Sweden.
25. SCB, Statistics Sweden. 1992. Tidsanvändningsundersökningen 1990/1991. Rapport 80, Tabeller: Stockholm.
26. SOU. 2000. Regional folkstyre och statlig länsförvaltning. Statens Offentliga Utredningar: Stockholm.
27. Thompson J, Sufrin S, Gould P, Buck M. 1962. Towards a geography of economic health. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 52: 1-20.
28. Westlund H. 2002. An unplanned green wave: settlement pattern in Sweden during the 1990s. Environment and Planning A 34: 1395-1410.