Support for a pluralistic view of behavioural evolution

Biology Letters

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 28-29

  Priest, Nicholas K ^a,b   Roach, Deborah A ^a   Galloway, Laura F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CELL VIABILITY; EGG PRODUCTION; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FITNESS; FLY; GROWTH RATE; LARVA; MATING; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM;

EID: 65949102996     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0434     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Ashburner, M., Golic,K. G. & Hawley, R. S. 2005 Drosophila: a laboratory handbook. New York, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
2. Bluhm, C. K. & Gowaty, P. A. 2004 Social constraints on female preferences in mallards, Anas platyrhynchos, decrease offspring viability and mother productivity. Anim. Behav. 68, 977-983.
3. David, J. 1963 Influence de la fécondation de la femelle sur le nombre et taille des oeufs pondus. J. Insect Physiol. 9, 13-24.
4. Gil, D., Graves, J., Hazon, J. & Wells, A. 1999 Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286, 126-128. (doi:10.1126/science.286.5437.126) (Pubitemid 29484492)
5. Head, M. L., Hunt, J., Jennions, M. D. & Brooks, R. 2005 The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol. 3, 289-294. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030033) (Pubitemid 40412648)
6. Kotiaho, J. S., Simmons, L. W., Hunt, J. & Tomkins, J. L. 2003 Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles, Onthophagus taurus. Am. Nat. 161, 852-859. (doi:10.1086/375173) (Pubitemid 36821259)
7. Long, T. A. F., Stewart, A. D. & Miller, P. M. 2009 Potential confounds to an assay of cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid. Biol. Lett. 5, 26-27.
8. Priest, N. K., Roach, D. A. & Galloway, L. F. 2008a Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid. Biol. Lett. 4, 6-8.
9. Priest, N. K., Galloway, L. F. & Roach, D. A. 2008b Mating frequency and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 171, 10-21.
10. Prout, T. & Clark, A. G. 2000 Seminal fluid causes temporarily reduced egg hatch in previously mated females. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 201-203. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.0988) (Pubitemid 30077197)
11. Snook, R. R. & Hosken, D. J. 2004 Sperm death and dumping in Drosophila. Nature 428, 939-941.